Skip to main content

Soil Formation and Nutrient Cycling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Soil is the foundation of terrestrial life – a complex ecosystem that supports plant growth and a living filter that binds and removes contaminants. Soil is also a fragile natural resource, and its mismanagement leads to lost productivity and a degraded environment. Soils play a critical role in a range of ecosystem services. These services include production of raw materials such as food and fiber, supporting natural processes including nutrient cycling, cultural services, and regulating services including waste treatment and air and water regulation (Costanza et al. 1997). Each of these can be related directly or indirectly to soil. A soils’ ability to hold and store water, to transform wastes and nutrients, to store carbon (soil is the third largest carbon sink, behind oceanic reserves and fossil fuels), and to support plant growth are clear services attributed to soils (Clothier et al. 1997; Costanza et al. 1997; Doran 2002; Robinson et al. 2013). There have been recent efforts to quantify the value of soils in relation to these services. One study attributed 17 % of the gross national product of New Zealand directly to soil resources (Kirkham and Clothier 2007). The value of macropores; the larger void spaces in soils that allow for movement of water and diffusion of gas to and from the atmosphere into the soil, in soils and the services associated with those pores was valued at $304 billion annually (Clothier et al. 2008). Soil valuation has not progressed to the point where the value of a particular soil can be quantified. While tools like life cycle assessment have enabled a fuller understanding of the environmental ramifications of different systems, no comparable tools have been developed for soils and their associated services. Despite the growing recognition of the importance and value of soils for supporting ecosystem services, there are very few to no incentives in the US that encourage soil preservation and improvement. Currently the best tool available in the US for quantifying the value of soils is the USDA Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) that pays farmers to leave sensitive soils fallow in order to preserve and protect them. The program currently includes 140,000 km2 with annual payments of $1.8 billion (Robinson et al. 2013). This is equivalent to a payment of $241,000 to develop 15 cm of topsoil at a soil formation rate of 0.008 cm year (Brown et al. 2014).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aggelides SM, Londra PA (2000) Effects of compost produced from town wastes and sewage sludge on the physical properties of a loamy and a clay soil. Bioresour Technol 71(3):253–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albiach R, Canet R, Pomares F, Ingelmo F (2001) Organic matter components and aggregate stability after the application of different amendments to a horticultural soil. Bioresour Tech 76:125–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alguacil M, Díaz- Pereira E, Caravaca F, Fernández DA, Roldán A (2009) Increased diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a long-term field experiment via application of organic amendments to a semiarid degraded soil. Appl Environ Micro 75:4254–4263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R, Guo Y, Gong P (2003) Soil diversity and land use in the United States. Ecosystems 6:470–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annabi M, Houot S, Francou C, Poitrenaud M, LeBissonnais Y (2007) Soil aggregate stability improvement with urban composts of different maturities. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:413–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banwart S (2011) Save our soils. Nature 474:151–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brady N, Weil R (2007) The nature and properties of soils. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresson LM, Koch C, LeBissonnais Y, Barriuso E, Lecomte V (2001) Soil surface structure stabilization by municipal waste compost application. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1804–1811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Cotton M (2011) Changes in soil properties and carbon content following compost application: results of on-farm sampling. Compost Sci Util 19:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Cogger C, Miltner E (2012) Soil carbon sequestration potential in urban areas. In: Lal R, Augustin B (eds) Carbon sequestration in urban ecosystems. Springer, Berlin, pp 173–196

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Mahoney M, Sprenger M (2014) A comparison of the efficacy and ecosystem impact of residuals-based and topsoil-based amendments for restoring historic mine tailings in the Tri-State mining district. Sci Tot Environ 485–486:624–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Kurtz K, Bary A, Cogger C (2011) Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil carbon storage and physical properties. Environ Sci Tech. dx.doi.org/10.1021/es2010418

  • Bulluck LR, Brosius M, Evanylo GK, Ristaino JB (2002) Organic and synthetic fertility amendments influence soil microbial, physical and chemical properties on organic and conventional farms. Appl Soil Ecol 19:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caravaca F, Lax A, Albaladejo J (2001) Soil aggregate stability and organic matter in clay and fine silt fractions in urban refuse- amended semiarid soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1235–1238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christie P, Easson DL, Picton JR, Love SCP (2001) Agronomic value of alkaline-stabilized sewage biosolids for spring barley. Agron J 93:144–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clothier BE, Green SR, Deurer M (2008) Preferential flow and transport in soil: progress and prognosis. Eur J Soil Sci 59:2–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00991.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Clothier B, Hall A, Deurer M, Green S, Mackay A (2009) Soil ecosystem services: sustaining returns on investment into natural capital. In: Proceedings of the OECD workshop on ‘Sustaining soil productivity in response to global climate change-science, policy and ethics’. University of Wisconsin, Wiley Blackwell, June 29–July 1, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogger CG (2005) Potential compost benefits for restoration of soils disturbed by urban development. Sci Util 13(4):243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogger CG, Bary AI, Fransen SC, Sullivan DM (2001) Seven years of biosolids versus inorganic nitrogen applications to tall fescue. J Environ Qual 30:2188–2194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cogger CG, Bary AI, Sullivan DM, Myhre EA (2004) Biosolids processing effects on first and second year available N. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:162–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cogger CG, Bary AI, Kennedy AC, Fortuna AM (2013a) Long-term crop and soil response to biosolids applications in dryland wheat. J Environ Qual 42:1872–1880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cogger CG, Bary AI, Myhre EA, Fortuna AM (2013b) Biosolids applications to tall fescue have long-term influence on soil nitrogen, carbon and phosphorus. J Environ Qual 42:516–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill R, Paruelo J, Raskin R, Sutton P, vanden Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capitol. Nature 387:253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doran J (2002) Soil health and global sustainability: translating science into practice. Agric Ecosyst Environ 88:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evanylo G, Sherony C, Spargo J, Starner D, Brosius M, Haering K (2008) Soil and water environmental effects of fertilizer-, manure-, and compost- based fertility practices in an organic vegetable cropping system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaleel R, Reddy KR, Overcash MR (1981) Changes in soil physical properties due to organic waste applications: a review. J Environ Qual 10:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham MB, Clothier BE (2007) Loss and recovery of research investment for applied sciences: a salutary lesson from New Zealand. HortTechnology 17(1):9–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Follett RF, Stewart BA, Kimble JM (2007) Carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change and advance food security. Soil Sci 172:943–956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland MJ, Vasquez IR, Vutran M, Schmitz M, Brobst RB, Greenhalgh L (2007) Rangeland restoration using biosolids land application. Water Pract 1:4. doi:10.2175/193317707X243382

    Google Scholar 

  • McIvor K, Cogger C, Brown S (2012) Effects of biosolids based soil products on soil physical and chemical properties in urban gardens. Compost Sci Util 20:199–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR (2007) Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(33):13268–13272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Park I, Zhang N, Ogunyoku TA, Young TM, Scow KM (2013) Effect of triclosan and biosolids on microbial community composition in an agricultural soil. Water Environ Res 85:2237–2242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Recycled Organics Unit (2006) Life cycle inventory and life cycle assessment for windrow composting systems. The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Available at http://www.recycledorganics.com/publications/reports/lca/lca.htm

  • Robinson DA, Jackson BM, Clothier BE, Cominati EJ, Marchant SC, Cooper DM, Bristow KL (2013) Advances in soil ecosystem services: concepts models and applications for earth system life support. Vadose Zone J doi:10.2136/vzj2013.01.0027

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan DM, Bary AI, Thomas DR, Fransen SC, Cogger CG (2002) Food waste compost effects on fertilizer nitrogen efficiency, available nitrogen and tall fescue yield. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:154–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian G, Granato TC, Cox AE, Pietz RI, Carlson CR Jr, Abedin Z (2009) Soil carbon sequestration resulting from long-term application of biosolids for land reclamation. J Environ Qual 38:61–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace BM, Krzic M, Forge TA, Broersma K, Newman RF (2009) Biosolids increase soil aggregation and protection of soil carbon five years after application on a crested wheatgrass pasture. J Environ Qual 38:291–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig Cogger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cogger, C., Brown, S. (2016). Soil Formation and Nutrient Cycling. In: Brown, S., McIvor, K., Hodges Snyder, E. (eds) Sowing Seeds in the City. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7453-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics