Abstract
In this chapter, we analyse the spatial ties of universities to society on the basis of institutional profiles and two comparative case studies of German universities. While institutional profiles, which provide snapshots of institutional realities, depict our two universities clearly as dichotomous globally and regionally oriented, the comparative case studies reveal that this juxtaposition is blurred in the perception of university members, particularly university leaders. Universities are organizations that sustain different layers of spatial orientation – local/regional, national and global. Even in an age of globalization and pervasive global interconnectedness, in which the international dimension of university research is emphasized more than ever, the local and regional grounding of universities remains warranted by their so-called third mission and the exigencies of teaching. Therefore, the spatial ties of universities are best described as a shell model of spatial interactions. A focal dominant horizon of a university’s institutional profile coexists with spatial orientations on variegated levels within the organization.
This paper presents results from the Project Change in Networks, Higher Education and Knowledge Societies funded by the German Research Council (DFG; DFG-refence nr TE 95/3-1, Oct 2009-Oct 2012). We thank Silvana Lombardi, Michael Borggräfe and Jesus Pineda for their help with the profiles and case studies, and David Hoffman, and Jussi Välimaa for their valuable comments
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
But such equality has always been more fiction than fact, and as Teichler has noted, beneath this legal institutional differentiation, a diversification through types of institutions “was constantly ‘on the move’ and ‘never stable’” (Teichler 2010, 159). And despite the overall makeup of the system configuration differences both vertical (differences in quality, basically research quality) and horizontal dimension (differences in disciplinary profiles) were present in the German system. Typically the vertical dimension has been more emphasized and attributes related to the horizontal dimension (international vs. regional) have been interpreted vertically and the attribute internationality has been seen as more reputable then the attribute regionality (Teichler 2005).
- 2.
The name of the university has been replaced in all quotes by “the University”. All quotes in German have been translated into English by the authors.
- 3.
- 4.
The Excellence Initiative is a billion Euro funding program by the German Research Foundation (DFG) in cooperation with the German Council of Science and Humanities (WR) for German universities, which has started with a budget of 1.9 billion € in 2005 (for the funding period 2007–2012) and has been prolonged from 2012 to 2017 with an increased funding volume of 2,7 billion €. The initiative is trying to establish internationally visible research beacons in Germany (BMBF-Excellence Initiative). Therefore, its main goals are to support to top-level research, to improve international visibility and competitiveness, creating outstanding conditions for young scientists, intensifying scientific competition and promoting equal opportunities for men and women. Excellence Initiative has three funding lines: graduate schools for promoting young researchers, clusters of excellence for supporting top-level research and institutional strategies for advancing institutional innovations and has become a very important source for research funding for German universities.
References
Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Paris: OECD.
Becher, T., & Kogan, M. (1992). Process and structure in higher education (2nd ed.). London/New York: Routledge.
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Blau, P. M. (1994). The organization of academic work (2nd ed.). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
de Ridder-Symoens, H. (Ed.). (1992). Universities in the middle ages. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
De Witt, H. (2009). Internationalization of higher education in the United States of America and Europe. IAP.
Djelic, M.-L., & Quack, S. (2003). Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. Cheltenham/Northhampton: E. Elgar.
Frank, D., & Meyer, J. W. (2007). Worldwide expansion and change in the university. In G. Krücken, A. Kosmü, & M. Tork (Eds.), Towards a multiversity?: Universities between global trends and national traditions (pp. 7–16). Bielefeld/Piscataway: Transcript/Distributed in North America by Transaction Publishers.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gilham, B. (2000). Case study research methods. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2004). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Hartley, J. (2004). Case study research. In C. Cassel & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 323–333). London: Sage.
Held, D. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hoffman, D., Raunio, M., & Korhonen, M. (2011). Finnish Universities: Car dealerships, churches or cultural institutions? In P. Teixeira & D. Dill (Eds.), Public vices, private virtues? Assessing the effects of marketization in higher education (pp. 273–296). Rotterdam: Sense Publications.
Hoffman, D., Babila Sama, T., El-Massri, A., Korhonen, M., & Raunio, M. (2013). The best science, the best science in Finnish – And English – Or the best Finnish scientists?. Recherches en Éducation (Research in Education), (ISSN: 1954–3077), pp. 48–62.
Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(1), Article 21.
Kosmützky, A. (2010). Von der organisierten Institution zur institutionalisierten Organisation Untersuchung der (Hochschul-)Leitbilder von Universitäten [From the organized institution to the institutionalized organization. An analysis of mission statements of German Universities]. Doctoral thesis, Department of Sociology, Bielefeld University. Available at: http://bieson.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/volltexte/2010/1870/
Kosmützky, A. (2016). (Hochschul-) Leitbilder von Universitäten in Deutschland. Eine Analyse der Hochschulreformprozesse 1990–2010 [Mission statements of German Universities. An analysis of the Higher Education Reform Process 1990–2010]. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
Kosmützky, A., & Nokkala, T. (2014). Challenges and trends in comparative higher education: An introduction. Higher Education, 67, 369–380.
Krücken, G., Kosmützky, A., & Torka, M. (2007). Towards a multiversity?: Universities between global trends and national traditions. In G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky, & M. Torka (Eds.), Towards a multiversity?: Universities between global trends and national tradition (pp. 7–16). Bielefeld/Piscataway: Transcript/Distributed in North America by Transaction Publishers.
Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities. Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 441–456.
Larman, V. (2013). Kleine Hochschulen in strukturschwachen Lagen Fallstudien aus Perspektive des Ressourcenabhängigkeitsansatzes. Flensburg. Retrieved from http://www.zhb-flensburg.de/dissert/larmann/dissertation%20larmann%20veit.pdf
Marginson, S. (2011). Introduction to part I. In R. King, S. Marginson, & R. Naido (Eds.), Handbook on globalization and higher education (pp. 3–9). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43(3), 281–309.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, (1/2). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-00/2-00mayring-e.htm
Meyer, J. W., & Schofer, E. (2007). The university in Europe and the world: Twentieth century expansion. In G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky, & M. Tork (Eds.), Towards a multiversity?: Universities between global trends and national traditions (pp. 7–16). Bielefeld/Piscataway: Transcript/Distributed in North America by Transaction Publishers.
Musselin, C. (2007). Are universities specific organizations? In G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky, & M. Torka (Eds.), Towards a multiversity?: universities between global trends and national traditions (pp. 63–84). Bielefeld/Piscataway: Transcript ; Distributed in North America by Transaction Publishers.
Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: Sage.
Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Rüegg, W. (Ed.). (2004). Geschichte der Universität in Europa. 4, Die Nachkriegszeit. München: Beck.
Rumbley, L. E., Deardorff, D. K., & Altbach, P. G. (2012). Internationalization within the higher education context. In D. K. Deardorff, H. de Wit, J. D. Heyl, T. Adams, P. G. Altbach, & L. Reisberg (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of international higher education. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/hdbk_interntlhighereducation/n1.xml
Scott, P. (2007). Back to the future? The evolution of higher education systems. In B. Kehm (Ed.), Looking back to look forward: Analyses of higher eduction after the turn of the Millenium (67). Kassel: INCHER.
Scott, P. (2011). The university as a global institution. In R. King, S. Marginson, & R. Naidoo (Eds.), Handbook on globalization and higher education (pp. 59–75). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Stake, R. E. (2004). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Stensaker, B., Välimaa, J., & Sarrico, C. (2012). Managing reform in universities: The dynamics of culture, identity and organisational change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stichweh, R. (2001). Die moderne Universität in einer globalen Gesellschaft. In U. Schimank & E. Stölting (Eds.), Die Krise der Universitäten (pp. 346–358). Oplade: Westdt. Verl.
Teichler, U. (1982). Regionaler und überregionaler Bezug der Hochschulen im Wandel. In Kellermann, P. (Ed.), Universität und Umland. Klagenfurt; Klagenfurter Beiträge zur bildungswissenschaftlichen Forschung (pp. 15–39).
Teichler, U. (2004). The changing debate on internationalisation of higher education. Higher Education, 48(1), 5–26.
Teichler, U. (2005). Hochschulstrukturen im Umbruch: eine Bilanz der Reformdynamik seit vier Jahrzehnten. Campus Verlag.
Teichler, U. (2010). The diversifying academic profession? Eurpean Review, 18(1), 157–179.
Välimaa, J. (2004). Nationalisation, localisation and globalisation in Finnish higher education. Higher Education, 48, 27–54.
Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2007). The future of Finnish higher education challenged by global competitive horizon. In S. Marginson (Ed.), Prospects of higher education: Globalization, market competition, public goods and the future of the university. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Webler, W.-D. (1984). Hochschule und Region: Wechselwirkungen. Weinheim: Beltz.
Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.
Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 58–65.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research, design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Ziguras, C. (2011). Extra-national provision. In R. King, S. Marginson, & R. Naidoo (Eds.), Handbook on globalization and higher education (pp. 114–128). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kosmützky, A., Ewen, A. (2016). Global, National and Local? The Multilayered Spatial Ties of Universities to Society. In: Hoffman, D., Välimaa, J. (eds) RE-BECOMING UNIVERSITIES?. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7369-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7369-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7368-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7369-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)