Skip to main content

Higher Education in Networked Knowledge Societies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
RE-BECOMING UNIVERSITIES?

Abstract

This conceptual chapter articulates an analytical synthesis: Networked Knowledge Society. This synthesis incorporates the role of knowledge, information and communication technology (ICT) and networks in order to better understand the dynamic nature of contemporary societies. It also conceptualises the relationships between contemporary societies and higher education. A traditional approach to examining the relationships between higher education and society is to consider this from the societal point of departure to interpret or explain change in higher education. Our approach, by contrast, is relational with respect to the dynamic role of higher education in societies and the ways in which higher education both transforms – and is transformed by – changing societies. We propose to briefly concentrate more generally on the nature of contemporary social order. We then advance the analytical synthesis Networked Knowledge Society, which both integrates a view of knowledge, ICT, and networks as the most important social phenomena in contemporary societies and that also illuminates the key relationships necessary to better understand twenty-first century societies and higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This also was a central goal of the EuroHESC Research Programme, in which CINHEKS was carried out.

  2. 2.

    The theory of Risk Society by Beck (1992) addresses some of the topics discussed in the theory of Knowledge Society. However, Beck was more interested in redefining the traditional relationship between nature and society than reflecting on the impacts of knowledge production for the society. One of his main arguments is that industrial society has made the world as its laboratory. For this reason we can understand social change from the redefinition of this relationship. In other words, “Nature” challenges “society, as society challenges nature” because each challenge the limitations of the other.

  3. 3.

    According to organizational theorist Blackler (1995) there can be found at least five different ways to define knowledge as a concept. These are (1) embrained knowledge which depends and conceptual skills and cognitive abilities; (2) embodied knowledge is action oriented and probably only partly explicit; (3) encultured knowledge, in turn, refers to processes of achieving shared understanding; (4) embedded knowledge resides in systemic routines; (5) encoded knowledge is information conveyed by signs and symbols.

  4. 4.

    Brainport area in The Netherlands gives a revealing example on this kind of development (see Lintsen 2009).

  5. 5.

    We refer to social structure in a broad, pragmatic sense, for example, the durable manner in which social relationships are patterned (Dewey 1929) reproduced and transformed (Bourdieu 1988) and in which new phenomena continuously emerge.

  6. 6.

    The changing locus and mode of knowledge production has been reflected in the conceptualisations such as Mode 1 & 2 knowledge production and the Triple Helix (Gibbons et al. 1994; Nowotny et al. 2001; Etzkowitz et al. 2000; Etzkowitz 2003) as discussed by Välimaa and Hoffman (2008).

References

  • Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (2nd ed.). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2012). Individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital theory. New York: Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom (Strange fruit). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2002). Changing knowledge regimes: Universities in a new research environment. Higher Education, 44, 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R. (2003). Theories of social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. (1992). History and social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of and actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In M. Callon et al. (Eds.), Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world. Houndmills: The Macmillan Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Volume I: The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Volume II: The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1998). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Volume III: End of millennium. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M., & Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the world: The making of twenty-first-century industrial complexes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M., Fernandez-Ardevol, M., & Qiu, J. L. (2006). Mobile communication and society: Global perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, A. (2007). Sociology in the age of internet. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organisational pathways of transformation. Guildford: IAU Pergamon/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1994). Four sociological traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidow, W. H. (2011). Overconnected. The promise and threat of the internet. Harrison/New York/Encino: Delphinum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, & Guattari. (2004). A thousand plateaus, Mille plateaux. Capitalisme et Schizophrénie. London: The Athlone Press (Original Mille plateux, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1929). The quest fro certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, K. (2009). Maailma ilman ulkopuolta. Verkostot yhteiskunnallisessa ajattelussa [A world without outside. Networks in societal thinking]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2003). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university–Industry–Government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Cantisano Terra, B. R. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limogenes, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scot, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley/Los Angeles: The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronow, P., Noro, A., & Töttö, P. (1997). Sosiologian klassikot [The classics of sociology]. Tampere: Vastapaino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haferkamp, H., & Smelser, N. (1992). Introduction. In H. Haferkamp & N. Smelser (Eds.), Social change and modernity (pp. 2–36). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1937). Economics and knowledge. Economica, IV, 33–54. Http://www.virtualschool.edu/mon./Economics/HayekEconomicsAndKnowledge.html

  • Hayek F. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4): 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2008). A cultural political economy of competitiveness and its implications for higher education. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the knowledge-based economy in Europe (pp. 11–39). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. (2010). Network analysis for global higher education: Standards and network power. ESF-funded workshop, Reykjavik, June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (2007). Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(4), 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, H., Savage, M., & Harvey, P. (2006). Social networks and the study of relations: Networks as method, metaphor and form. Economy and Society, 35(1), 113–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintsen, H. (2009). ‘Brainport’, de toekomst: hightech en design in een netwerkeconomie. In H. W. Lintsen, & P. Thoben (Eds.), De Canon van Eindhoven. ‘s-Hertogenbosch: Heinen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies, K. (1982). Sociological theory in use. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1984). Human capital and economic growth. Economics of Education Review, 3(3), 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. (2007). Are universities specific organizations? In G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky, & M. Torka (Eds.), Towards a multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1996). Knowledge-based economy. Paris. OCDE/GD(96)102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papatsiba, V. (2011). Who needs higher education research, and why?. Final seminar of the Centre for Higher Education Research and Information (CHERI – OU). Available at http://www.open.ac.uk/cheri/documents/tributes_to_cheri.pdf

  • Papatsiba, V. (2013). The idea of collaboration in the academy, its epistemic and social potentials and risks for knowledge generation. Policy Futures in Education, 11(4), 436–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. A. (2007). Knowledge economy, development and the future of higher education (Educational futures, rethinking theory and practice, Vol. 10). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. L. (2005). Re-imagining and rescripting the future of education: global knowledge economy discourses and the challenge to education systems. Comparative Education, 42(2), 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen, T., & Välimaa, J. (2012). Change as an intellectual device and as an object of research. In B. Stensaker, J. Välimaa & C. S. Sarrico (Eds.), Managing reform in universities. The dynamics of culture, identity and organizational change. Issues in higher education. Chippenham/Eastbourne: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism. Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Cantwell, B. (2012). Transatlantic moves to the market: Academic capitalism in the United States and European Union. Higher Education, 63(5), 583–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehr, N. (1994). Knowledge societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehr, N. (1999). The texture of knowledge societies. In V. Meja & N. Stehr (Eds.), The sociology of knowledge (Vol. II, pp. 586–629). Cheltenham/Northampton: An Elgar Reference Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (1996). Cutting the network. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23, 517–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, J., & Ashton, D. (2005). High performance work practices: Linking strategy and skills to performance outcomes. London: Department of Trade and Industry (in association with CIPD).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2005). Toward knowledge societies. UNESCO world report. http://www.unesco.org/publications

  • Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education. Higher Education, 56, 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, H. N. (2006). Challenging the orthodoxies of knowledge; epistemological, structural and political implications for higher education. In G. Neave (Ed.), Knowledge, power and dissent: critical perspectives on higher education and research in knowledge society (pp. 61–87). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jussi Välimaa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Välimaa, J., Papatsiba, V., Hoffman, D.M. (2016). Higher Education in Networked Knowledge Societies. In: Hoffman, D., Välimaa, J. (eds) RE-BECOMING UNIVERSITIES?. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7369-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7369-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7368-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7369-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics