Advertisement

Introduction

Chapter
  • 293 Downloads

Abstract

Change in rates of population growth and in the characteristics of populations are often seen as background information that do not directly alter the future socioeconomic characteristics of the United States. This chapter provides evidence clearly establishing that change in the size, distribution, age, gender, race/ethnicity, household composition, and other characteristics of populations directly and indirectly impact future socioeconomic and subsequent demand for public and private goods and services. It delineates how, using population projections from the U.S. Census Bureau and a large array of data collected by the authors, population-based projections of educational attainment, change in income and other economic resources, public services, the labor force, households, housing demand, health care requirements, levels of financial investment, and transportation can be used to understand and plan for the future of the United States.

Keywords

Census Bureau Socioeconomic Characteristic Median Income Hispanic Child Socioeconomic Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abdullah, A. J., Doucouliagos, H., Manning, E. (2011). Education and income inequality: A meta-regression analysis. Paper presented at MAER-NET colloquium (September 16–18, 2011), Wolfson College. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, G., Bracewell, K., Sorenson, E., & Turner, M. (2013). The Moynihan report revisited. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Ahlburg, D. A., & Land, K. C. (1992). Population forecasting: Guest editors’ introduction. International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashenfelter, O., & Rouse, C. (1999). Schooling, intelligence and income in America: Cracks in the bell curve (Working paper 6902 (January)). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baretz-Snowden, J., Rock, D., Pollock, J., & Wilder, G. (1988). Educational progress of language minority children: Findings from the NAEP 1985–86 special study. Princeton: National Assessment of Educational Progress/Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  6. Bartik, T. J. (2011). Who benefits? Distributional effects of early childhood programs and business incentives, and their implications for policy. In T. Bartik (Ed.), Investing in kids: Early childhood programs and local economic development (pp. 219–266). Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beaton, A. E. (1986). National assessment of educational progress 1983–84, technical report. Princeton: National Assessment of Educational Progress/Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, G. S. (1967). Human capital and the personal distribution of income. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  9. Berry, B. J. L., & Horton, F. E. (1970). Geographic perspectives on urban systems with integrated readings. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Bowman, M. J., & Anderson, C. A. (1963). Concerning the role of education in development. In C. Geetz (Ed.), Old societies and new states (pp. 247–279). Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Breton, T. R. (2010). Schooling and national income: How large are the externalities? Education Economics, 18(1), 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Card, D. (1999). The casual effect of education on earnings. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1801–1834). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  13. Cheeseman Day, J., & Newburger, E. C. (2002). The big payoff: Educational attainment and synthetic estimates of work-life earnings (Current population reports P23-210 (July)). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  14. Cohn, E., & Addison, J. T. (1998). The economic returns to lifelong learning. Education Economics, 6(3), 253–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohn, D., & Bahrampour, T. (2006, May 10). Of U.S. children under 5, nearly half are minorities. The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/concent/article/2006/05/09/AR2006050901841.html. Accessed 22 Jan 2011.
  16. Davern, M. E., & Fisher, P. J. (2001). Household net worth and asset ownership: 1995 (Current population reports P70-71 (February)). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  17. Denison, E. F. (1962). The sources of economic growth in the United States and alternatives before us (Supplementary paper no. 13). New York: Committee on Economic Development.Google Scholar
  18. Denny, K., Harmon, C., & Redmond, S. (2000). Functional literacy, educational attainment and earnings-evidence from the international adult literacy survey (April). London, UK: The Institute for Fiscal Studies, WP 00/09.Google Scholar
  19. Duncan, O. D. (1964). Social organization and the ecosystem. In R. Farris (Ed.), Handbook of modern sociology (pp. 36–82). Chicago: Rand McNally and Co.Google Scholar
  20. Duncan, O. D., & Schnore, L. F. (1959). Cultural, behavioral, and ecological perspectives in the study of social organization. American Journal of Sociology, 65(2), 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duncan, G., Ludwig, J., & Magnuson, K. (2007). Reducing poverty through pre-school intervention. The Future of Children, 17, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ekstrom, R. B., Goertz, M. E., Pollack, J. M., & Rock, D. A. (1986). Who drops out of high school and why? Findings from a national study. Teachers College Record, 87, 356–373.Google Scholar
  23. ESRI. (2007). Evaluating population projections – The importance of accurate forecasting. White paper. http://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/evaluating-population.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2014.
  24. Gibbs, J. P., & Martin, W. T. (1959). Toward a theoretical system of human ecology. The Pacific Sociological Review, 2(1), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gordon, R. J., & Becker, I. D. (2012). Controversies about the rise of American inequality: A survey (Working paper no. 13982). New York: NBER.Google Scholar
  26. Gottschalk, A. O. (2008). Net worth and the assets of households: 2002 (Current population reports P70-115 (April)). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  27. Gribble, J. N., & Bremner, J. (2012). Achieving a demographic dividend. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau. http://www.prb.org/pdf12/achieving-demographic-dividend.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2014.
  28. Hanoch, G. (1967). An economic analysis of earning and schooling. Journal of Human Resources, 2(Summer), 310–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hawley, A. H. (1950). Human ecology: A theory of community structure. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
  30. Isaacs, J. B. (2010). Child poverty during the great recession: Predicting state child poverty rates for 2010 (Executive summary (December)). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  31. Isaacs, J. B. (2011). The recession’s ongoing impact on America’s children: Indicators of children’s economic well-being through 2011. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  32. Isaacs, J. B. (2012). Starting school at a disadvantage: The school readiness of poor children (Executive summary (March)). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  33. Isaacs, J. B., & Magnuson, K. (2011). Income and education as predictors of children’s school readiness. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  34. Jacob, B. A., & Ludwig, J. (2009). Improving educational outcomes for poor children. In M. Cancian & S. Danziger (Eds.), Changing poverty, changing politics. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, K. M., & Lichter, D. T. (2010). Growing diversity among America’s children and youth: Spatial and temporal dimensions. Population and Development Review, 36(1), 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Julian, T. A., & Kominski, R. A. (2011). Education and synthetic work – Life earnings estimates (American community survey reports. ACS-14). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  37. Kelly, P. J. (2005a). Income of U.S. workforce projected to decline if education doesn’t improve. Policy alert. San Jose: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.Google Scholar
  38. Kelly, P. J. (2005b). As America becomes more diverse: The impact of State higher education inequality (Report). Boulder: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS).Google Scholar
  39. Lutz, W. (2012). Demographic metabolism: A predictive theory of socioeconomic change. Population and Development Review, 38, 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mannheim, K. (1952 [1928]). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Originally published as Das problem der generationen. Kölner Vierteljahreshefte für Soziologie 7 (1928), pp. 157185. Google Scholar
  41. Maralani, V. (2013). The demography of social mobility: Black-white differences in the process of educational reproduction. American Journal of Sociology, 118(6), 1509–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mather, M. (2009). Children in immigrant families chart new path (Reports on America). Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  43. McKinsey & Company. (2009). The economic impact of the achievement gap in America’s schools, summary of findings. New York: Social Sector Office.Google Scholar
  44. Micklin, M., & Poston, D. L., Jr. (Eds.). (1998). Continuities in sociological human ecology. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  45. Milne, A., & Gombert, J. (1983). Students with a primary language other than English: Distribution and service rates. In K. Baker & A. DeKanter (Eds.), Bilingual education (pp. 133–138). Lexington: Heath.Google Scholar
  46. Milne, A., Myers, D. E., Rosenthal, A. S., & Ginsberg, A. (1986). Single parents, working mothers, and the educational achievement of school children. Sociology of Education, 59, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience and earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Murdock, S. H. (1995). An America challenged: Population change and the future of the United States. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  49. Murdock, S. H., & Albrecht, D. E. (1998). An ecological investigation of agricultural patterns in the United States. In M. Micklin & D. L. Poston Jr. (Eds.), Continuities in sociological human ecology (pp. 299–316). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Murdock, S. H., & Ellis, D. (1991). Applied demography: An introduction to basic concepts, methods, and data. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  51. Murdock, S. H., & Sutton, W. A., Jr. (1974). The new ecology and community theory: Similarities, differences, and convergences. Rural Sociology, 39, 319–333.Google Scholar
  52. Murdock, S. H., Backman, K., Hoque, M. N., & Ellis, D. (1991). The implications of change in population size and composition on future participation in outdoor recreational activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 238–259.Google Scholar
  53. Murdock, S. H., Hoque, N., Michael, M., White, S., & Pecotte, B. (1997). The Texas challenge: Population change and the future of Texas. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Murdock, S. H., White, S., Hoque, M. N., Pecotte, B., You, X., & Balkan, J. (2003). The new Texas challenge: Population change and the future of Texas. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Murdock, S. H., Cline, M. E., & Zey, M. (2012). The children of the Southwest. Washington, DC: First Focus.Google Scholar
  56. Murdock, S. H., Cline, M. E., Zey, M., Jeanty, P. W., & Perez, D. (2014). Changing Texas: Implications of addressing or ignoring the Texas challenge. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Namboodiri, K. (1988). Ecological demography: Its place in sociology. American Sociological Review, 53(4), 619–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1985). The reading report card. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  59. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2005). Income of U.S. workforce projected to decline if education doesn’t improve. San Jose: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.Google Scholar
  60. Park, R. E. (1936). Human ecology. American Journal of Sociology, 42, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Passel, J., & Cohn, D. (2008a). Trends in unauthorized immigration: Undocumented inflow now trails legal inflow (October). Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.Google Scholar
  62. Passel, J., & Cohn, D. (2008b). U.S. population projections: 2005–2050 (11 February). Washington DC: Pew Hispanic Center.Google Scholar
  63. Perez, A. D., & Hirschman, C. (2009). The changing racial and ethnic composition of the U.S. population: Emerging American identities. Population and Development Review, 35, 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Psacharopoulos, G., & Tilak, J. B. G. (1992). Education and wage earnings. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), The encyclopedia of educational research (pp. 419–423). New York: American Educational Research Association. Macmillan.Google Scholar
  65. Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In R. Murname & G. Duncan (Eds.), Social inequality and economic disadvantage (pp. 91–116).Google Scholar
  66. Romer, P. M. (1990). Human capital and growth: Theory and evidence. Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy, 32, 251–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rosen, S. (1987). Human capital. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgrate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (Vol. 2, pp. 681–690). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Ryan, C., & Siebens, J. (2012). Educational attainment in the United States: 2009 (Current population reports P20-566 (February)). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  69. Ryder, N. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30(6), 843–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schultz, T. W. (1963). The economic values of education. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Schultz, T. W. (1968). Resources for higher education: An economist’s view. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Siegel, J. S. (2002). Applied demography: Applications to business, government, law, and public policy. Salt Lake City: Academic.Google Scholar
  73. Siegel, J. S., & Swanson, D. (Eds.). (2004). The methods and materials of demography. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  74. Smith, S. K., Tayman, J., & Swanson, D. A. (2001). State and local population projections: Methodology and analysis. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  75. Tayman, J., Smith, S. K., & Rayer, S. (2011). Evaluating population forecast accuracy: A regression approach using county data. Population Research and Policy Review, 30(2), 235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tolley, G. S., & Olson, E. (1971). The interdependence between income and education. Journal of Political Economy, 79, 460–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Turner, M., Santos, R., Levy, D., Wissoker, D., Aranda, C., & Pitingolo, R. (2013). Housing discrimination against racial and ethnic minorities 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.Google Scholar
  78. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). 2010 American community survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  79. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012a). Population projections press release December 12, 2012. Press release. U.S. Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/population/cb12-243.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2012.
  80. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012b). 2012 National population projections. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  81. U.S. Census Bureau, & U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2011). Educational attainment-people 25 years old and over, by total money earnings in 2010, work experience in 2010, age, race, Hispanic origin, and sex (Current population survey, annual social and economic supplement). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hobby Center & Department of SociologyRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Hobby Ctr. for the Study of TexasRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  3. 3.University of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA
  4. 4.AlexandriaUSA
  5. 5.Verizon WirelessHilliardUSA

Personalised recommendations