Skip to main content

How Should We Feel About Another’s Death?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Death’s Values and Obligations: A Pragmatic Framework

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 62))

  • 415 Accesses

Abstract

Death most clearly harms an individual when it is the demise of someone to whom the individual has some sort of emotional relationship, such as love, friendship, or respect. Not only will the loss justify mourning or grieving, but also the process of dying and the event of death can cause additional feelings and emotions. Assuming that these emotional reactions or mental states can be sufficiently controlled by the person who will and does experience them, then there can be morally right/bad and wrong/bad feelings and emotions within a given context. In what follows, I will consider some of the main emotions associated with death and dying, emphasizing guilt. Guilt can arise for a variety of reasons—some justified, whereas others are not; hence, it can serve as a model for determining when an emotional reaction is fitting when someone is dying or dies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Other signs of approval when the Pilgrim acts as he should can be seen in different areas of the work, including the Simonists’ realm when, after the Pilgrim chastises Pope Nicholas, Virgil clasps the Pilgrim to his chest to climb back to the path. (Dante, Canto XIX, 124-6).

  2. 2.

    Of course, a person should be merciful as a person, but is not obligated to act mercifully in any specific situation. This life narrative obligation shows that a person’s life can have different properties than the events and actions making up that life.

  3. 3.

    Kant might argue that some have lost their human dignity, and therefore, deserve no respect.

  4. 4.

    There is some debate as to whether Hitler was responsible for his actions. There are individuals who claim that no mentally competent person could perpetrate such heinous activities; thus, Hitler was mentally insane and, therefore, a moral subject.

  5. 5.

    See also Kubler-Ross (1972, 1975).

  6. 6.

    The news media assisted this alteration in what people require in mourning by creating an expectation that everyone needed to be very public in their feelings. The media did this by primarily showing only those engaged in extravagant mourning and attacking anyone who did not desire to publicly demonstrate their private feelings, such as the United Kingdom’s royal family.

  7. 7.

    Morris Wessel argues that children should be part of the process, including going to the funeral, so that they can be part of the mourning community (Wessel 1996, 78).

  8. 8.

    Of course, there will be many who have no guilty feeling at all.

  9. 9.

    Hebert Morris claims that “if individuals sincerely believe themselves guilty, good reasons exist for accepting the belief.” (Morris 1987, 222). Moreover, this guilt is appropriate if “we are disposed to think the feeling natural, the object cited as occasioning it an acceptable one, and if there is no strong pull to the view the feeling is displaced, there is good reason to regard it as appropriate, [and there is the] existence of widespread respect for attitudes underlying the feeling”. (Morris 1987, 224–5).

  10. 10.

    This argument has interesting connections to proxies making end of life decisions for others, especially for their family members.

  11. 11.

    Even if the sacrifice had been a goat, indifference to its value as a living animal would also have been wrong.

  12. 12.

    Since it poses a problem for both Nussbaum and Greenspan, this problem will be developed in more detail in the section on Greenspan’s dilemmas of exhaustive prohibition .

  13. 13.

    I assume that the other conditions of the doctrine remain the same:

    1. 1.

      The action itself must be morally good or indifferent.

    2. 2.

      The good effect cannot be caused by the bad effect, and the good effect must be directly caused by the action.

    3. 3.

      On balance, the good of the good effect must outweigh to an adequate degree the bad of the bad effect.

  14. 14.

    Greenspan actually does so in “Moral Dilemmas and Guilt's” fourth note.

  15. 15.

    This concept will receive far greater development in the next chapter.

  16. 16.

    It might be the case that ordering one child to die is of equal moral value to allowing both to die. Perhaps, working within an evil system, like that of the Nazis, adds negative value to the saving of either child. The additional negative value is sufficient to make it impossible to decide which action is likely to be worse. It might also be the case that collaborating in such a system disrespects the intrinsic value of those involved. The guard is attempting to degrade Sophie by forcing her to make a choice, but Sophie can only be degraded by her choice to collaborate with the guard scheme.

    The situation is similar to what happened to those who helped desegregate luncheon counters in the American South in the 1960s. Although having things poured on them and being verbally abused was intended by those doing it to disrespect and degrade the recipients of the treatment, the protestors’ human dignity and flourishing as individuals and persons were enhanced rather than harmed by how they responded to the intense provocations. Their refusal to be degraded by allowing themselves to be provoked showed their integrity to their principles of humanity and non-violence, whereas the provocateurs degraded themselves by the inhumanity they exhibited. If she respects herself, Sophie should refuse to choose, according to this line of reasoning. If this is true, then a hard choice remains.

  17. 17.

    Carlo Felice argues that if a person has a duty to help others in dangerous situations or dire need, which requires that the actor keep informed to know when those situations arise, then the actor has a duty to keep informed, ceteris paribus (Felice 1990).

  18. 18.

    The Doctrine of Double Effect might strike some as an ad hoc solution to a problem that need not exist. If we eliminate those absolute moral principles that inadequately consider a situation’s circumstances, then there is no need for the doctrine. Therefore, the principles will suffice on their own without adding a way to get around them because they are defective by default.

  19. 19.

    This seems to be a very large part of Greenspan’s argument for practical guilt . (See Greenspan’s Practical Guilt, 111–5)

  20. 20.

    I have claimed that remorse has an element of shame, which would make it much more self-oriented than allowed for in this passage.

  21. 21.

    Sandy Bem spent five years helping her family become accustomed to her death from suicide. Bem had been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, and decided that she did not want a life in which the disease had progressed too far. Bem’s daughter, Emily, stated “It was just so obvious that this is about as good as it gets for a human exit…She was surrounded by everyone who loved her, they were telling her how and why they loved her. This is not a bad way to go.” (Spiegel 2014)

  22. 22.

    Islam has long held these financial duties, as well as those that eliminate the person’s moral debts whilst improving who she is as a person (Muwahidi 1989).

References

  • Aeschylus. 1970. Agamemnon. Trans. H. Lloyd-Jones. London: Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, G.E.M. 1961. War and Murder. In Moral problems, ed. J. Rachels, 393–407. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1985. Nichomachean ethics. Trans. T. Irwin. Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armon-Jones, C. 2003. The thesis of constructionism. Philosophy & the emotions, ed. S. Leighton, 181–203. Peterborough: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcan Marcus, R. 1980. Moral dilemmas and consistency. In Moral dilemmas, ed. C. Gowans, 188–204. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, M. 1988. Remorse and agent-regret, 259–281. XIII: Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conee, E. 1982. Against Moral Dilemmas. In Moral Dilemmas, ed. Christopher Gowans, 239–249. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dante Alighieri. 1971. The divine comedy Vol. I: Inferno, Trans. M. Musa. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia, D. 1998. Biology, consciousness, and the definition of death, Report from the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, Winter/Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felice, C. 1990. On the obligation to keep informed about distant atrocities. Human Rights Quarterly 12: 397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganzini, L., et al. 2009. Mental health outcomes of family members of Oregonians who request physician aid in dying. Journal of Pain Symptom Management 386: 807–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, P.S. 1974. Moral dilemmas and guilt. Philosophical Studies 43: 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, P.S. 1995. Practical guilt. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, E.N. 1974. Grief. In Concerning death: a practical guide for living, ed. E.A. Grollman, 1–12. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavka, G.S. 1974. Wrongdoing and guilt. The Journal of Philosophy 71(18): 663–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, M. 2007. The history of death: burial customs and funeral rites, from the ancient world to modern times. Guilford: The Lyons Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. 2003. Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis 63: 190–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konigsberg, R.D. 2011. The truth about grief. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubler-Ross, E. 1969. On death & dying. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubler-Ross, E. 1972. Questions & answers on death & dying. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubler-Ross, E. 1975. Death. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, H. 1987. Nonmoral guilt. In Responsibility, character, and emotions: new essays in moral psychology, ed. F. Schoeman, 220–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muwahidi, A.A. 1989. Islamic perspectives on death and dying. In Perspectives on death and dying, ed. A. B et al, 38–54. Philadelphia: The Charles Press, Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neblett, W. 1974. The ethics of guilt. The Journal of Philosophy 71(18): 652–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. 1985. Aeschylus and practical conflict. Ethics 95: 233–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radzik, L. 2009. Making amends. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Safer, J. 2008. Death benefits: how losing a parent can change an adult’s life—for the better. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, A. 2014. How a woman’s plan to kill herself helped her family grieve. NPR, http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/06/23/323330486/how-a-womans-plan-to-kill-herself-helped-her-family-grieve. Accessed 3 July 2014.

  • Statman, D. 1995. Moral dilemmas. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twain, M. 2012. Autobiography of Mark Twain: Volume 1. Ed. H.E. Smith et al. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen, A.A.E. and P.J.J. Sauer. 2005. End-of-Life Decisions in Newborns: An Approach From the Netherlands Pediatrics, http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/116/3/736.full. Accessed 21 June 2014.

  • Wessel, M.A. 1996. When children mourn a loved one. In Facing death, H.M. Spiro, ed. M.G. McCrea Curnen, and L. Palmer Wandel, 77–80. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis R. Cooley .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cooley, D.R. (2015). How Should We Feel About Another’s Death?. In: Death’s Values and Obligations: A Pragmatic Framework. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 62. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7264-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics