Skip to main content

How Should We Feel About Our Own Death?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Death’s Values and Obligations: A Pragmatic Framework

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 62))

  • 421 Accesses

Abstract

Sigmund Freud argued that people believe in God because they fear their own death. If there is a divine entity that takes a very positive personal interest in you, and has the power to keep your personality alive after your body has died, then death need not concern you because you will never undergo it. Hence, since death is unable to harm those God preserves, then fear and other feelings and emotions should alter accordingly. Fear, for instance, should be assuaged by the belief in this god, although in reality it might be simply repressed. In this chapter, I examine the morality of some of the most significant feelings and emotions we have toward our own deaths. Depending upon which view is adopted for understanding emotions and feelings—and I advocate for a pluralistic, pragmatic approach—we can not only have morally right/bad or wrong/bad emotional reactions and emotions, we can also have obligations to feel a certain way at a certain time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Emotions and feelings are not treated as the same thing in the literature on emotions. If feelings are discussed, then they tend to be an involuntary emotional reaction. I will argue that emotions are actually comprised by different things. In some cases, they are involuntary feelings, and in others they are cognitive judgments. However, I will assume that there is a unique feeling to each emotional reaction which might or might not be controllable in some way by the entity experiencing the emotional reaction or feeling.

  2. 2.

    Prinz seems to define emotions as emotional reactions to a particular stimulus rather than as habits or traits (Prinz 2006).

  3. 3.

    Angst might be an exception.

  4. 4.

    This seems to be Damasio’s position as well: emotions are “constituted by a patterned collection of chemical and neural responses that the brain produces when it detects the presence of an emotionally competent stimulus… Emotionally competent stimulus depends on evolutionary history, personal history or current context.” (Damasio 2004, 50–1). Moreover, the responses are produced automatically, which entails that we would have no free will other than trying to alter them through a different stimulus.

  5. 5.

    Elster (2004) also argues that, at times, emotions can subvert rationality.

  6. 6.

    Solomon’s Chapter 8 of The Passions (1993) is an excellent resource on particular emotions, including how they work.

  7. 7.

    As usual, there is no one version of cognitivism that has been adopted by those working in the area. William Lyons , for example, argues that not only are emotions judgments, but also they are affect-laden judgments (Lyons 1980).

  8. 8.

    This is Robinson’s example.

  9. 9.

    de Sousa believes both are the result of evolutionary processes (de Souza 2010, 96).

  10. 10.

    Robert H. Frank argues that moral emotions are at least consistent with an evolutionary explanation of their origin. It better serves someone’s self-interest if the entity is cooperative with others than if the entity was not part of a cooperative arrangement (Frank 2004, 422).

  11. 11.

    Tangney et al. claim that a person’s history or past allows people to infer the emotions that will result (Tangney et al. 2007, 3).

  12. 12.

    Jeanne Safer believes that we can train ourselves to respond appropriately when our parents die, which would seem to work for other instances of the death of loved ones.

    1. 1.

      Motivate—make a conscious decision to address and learn from your parent’s death, investing time and energy in the project.

    2. 2.

      Anticipate—give yourself permission to seek death benefits and identify your resistance to doing so.

    3. 3.

      Meditate—cultivate a receptive stance. Think seriously about both the positive and negative impact your parent has had on your life, and the unfinished business between you.

    4. 4.

      Activate—death benefits are available at any time, and evolve over time. Actions to periodically pursue them—construct a narrative of your parent’s history as objectively as possible; conduct an inventory of your parent’s character; seek new experiences and relationships to support the changes you desire (Safer 2008, 5–6).

  13. 13.

    I am assuming a world in which merit is used in the music industry, which might be too fanciful an assumption to capture how the real world functions.

  14. 14.

    Bernard Williams argues that this is also reflected in Ancient Greek culture (Williams 1993, 83).

  15. 15.

    Marie de Hennezel uses the narrative approach in her therapy with the dying so that they can form a perception of their life as a whole. By doing this, she believes that “Death can cause a human being to become what he or she was called to become; it can be, in the fullest sense of the word, an accomplishment.” (Hennezel 1979, ix). I take this to mean that understanding one’s life as a result of understanding death is what she is referring to here and not that being dead is an accomplishment for a person.

  16. 16.

    Daniel Haybron’s Systematic Imprudence thesis is that “Human beings are systematically prone to make a wide range of serious errors in matters of personal welfare. These errors are weighty enough to substantially compromise the expected lifetime well-being for individuals possessing a high degree of freedom to shape their lives as they wish, even under reasonably favorable conditions.” (Haybron 2008, 227). Haybron provides a plausible and probable argument for the Systematic Imprudence thesis over the Aptitude thesis, which somewhat naively believes that if people have the freedom to do so, they will choose and live prudently (Ibid., 229).

  17. 17.

    Murphy’s argument could possibly work for avoiding harm that would not immediately end one’s life. I keep up my brakes because I do not want to die in anguish, be disfigured, experience enormous pain and suffering, or be affected in other ways that would greatly reduce the quality of my life and my ability to flourish.

  18. 18.

    William Hazlett argues that “The effeminate clinging to life as such…is the effect of a highly civilized and artificial state of society.” (Hazlett 1926, 311).

  19. 19.

    In many African societies, death is not feared because there is a widespread belief in a very positive afterlife (Wiredu 1989, 24). In fact, death can be a positive for both the deceased and the survivors. It “gives the community the opportunity to give concrete expression to community solidarity.” (Opuku 1989, 20).

  20. 20.

    She actually died on her bed or the floor after she took an overdose.

  21. 21.

    Descartes’ clear and distinct perception seems to work well enough here for distinguishing immediate sensation and reflection from imagination.

  22. 22.

    Kekes’ explicitly claims that the enjoyment of life varies with individuals and contexts so that morality cannot hold universally or impersonally (Kekes 2008, 137). However, there seems to be a universal rule on how to live one’s life well that applies to all people, although what one can do to have an enjoyable life in particular is under a great deal of control by the individual.

  23. 23.

    By meaningful choice , I mean that there are at least two attractive enough alternatives from which the agent can choose. Moreover, the choices carry about the same benefit and burden so that none of them could be considered to be more coercive than the other. That is, if one alternative leads to a billion dollar reward, while the other had no more benefit than the feeling of a job well done, then the first would have an element of duress to it for the agent that the latter lacks.

  24. 24.

    Ruth Garfield argues that our natural death anxiety can be dealt with appropriately by recognizing and acting upon the need to take responsibility for one’s life (Garfield 2010, 129).

  25. 25.

    I believe that an argument can be made that they are inferior in certain situations, but are not always or generally so. The standard by which to measure a person’s pleasure is related to the person’s flourishing as that person exists in this world.

  26. 26.

    There is a thought experiment posed by Robert Nozick that asks people whether it is better to lead a real life rather than one that is imaginary (Nozick 1974, 42–5).

References

  • Annas, J. 1993. The morality of happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1985. Nichomachean ethics. Trans. T. Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armon-Jones, C. 2003. The thesis of constructionism. Philosophy and the emotions, ed. S. Leighton, 181–203. Peterborough: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asma, T.S. 2009. An unnatural history of our worst fears. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 2001. Social cognitive theory: An agenic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, V. 2007. Philosophical thinking about death and dying. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. “Happiness Quotes.” http://www.wisdomquotes.com/cat_happiness.html. Accessed 27 Aug 2014.

  • Carroll, N. 1990. The philosophy of horror. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caws, P. 2007. Pragmatic immortality and the insignificance of my own death. In Re-imaging death and dying, ed. D.R. Cooley, and L. Steffen, 3–13. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colarusso, C.A. 2010. Living to die and dying to live: Normal and pathological considerations of death anxiety. In The wounded of mortality: Fear, denial, and acceptance of death, ed. S. Akhtar, 107–124. Lanham: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. 2004. Emotions and feelings. In Feelings and emotions, ed. A.S.R. Manstead, N. Frijda, and A. Fischer, 39–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. 2010. Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dante Alighieri. 1971. The divine comedy Vol. I: Inferno, Trans. M. Musa. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Montaigne, M. 1958. The complete essays of Montaigne. Trans. D. Frame. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deigh, J. 2010. Concepts of emotions in modern philosophy and psychology. In The Oxford handbook of the philosophy of the emotions, ed. P. Goldie, 17–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGreef, B., A. Burnett, and D. Cooley. 2010. Communicating and philosophizing about authenticity or inauthenticity in a fast-paced world. Journal of Happiness Studies 11(4): 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa, R. 1987. The rationality of emotion. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa, R. 2010. The mind’s Bermuda triangle: Philosophy of emotions and empirical science. In The Oxford handbook of the philosophy of the emotions, ed. P. Goldie, 95–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demske, J.M. 1970. Being, man and death. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doring, S.A. 2010. Why be emotional? In The Oxford handbook of the philosophy of the emotions, ed. P. Goldie, 283–301. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. 2004. What we become emotional about. In Feelings and Emotions, ed. A.S.R. Manstead, N. Frijda, and A. Fischer, 119–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. 2004. Emotions and rationality. In Feelings and emotions, ed. A.S.R. Manstead, N. Frijda, and A. Fischer, 30–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. 2010. Emotional choice and rational choice. In The Oxford handbook of the philosophy of the emotions, ed. P. Goldie, 263–282. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falls, C.E. 2008. Palliative healthcare: Cost reduction and quality enhancement using end-of-life survey methodology. Journal Gerontological Social Work 51(1–2): 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R.H. 2004. Introducing moral emotions into models of rational choice. In Feelings and Emotions, ed. A.S.R. Manstead, N. Frijda, and A. Fischer, 422–440. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, R. 2010. Facing death: Intrapsychic conflict and intergenerational passage. In The wounded of mortality: Fear, denial, and acceptance of death, ed. S. Akhtar, 125–134. Lanham: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelvin, M. 1970. A commentary on Heidegger’s being and time. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, M. 1972. Heidegger, Martin. In The encyclopedia of philosophy, vol. 3 and 4, ed. Paul Edwards, 459–65. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. & The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P.E. 2003. Modularity and the psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In Philosophy and emotions, ed. S. Leighton, 256–275. Orchard Park: Broadview Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, P. 2010. Learning emotions and ethics. In The Oxford handbook of philosophy of emotion, ed. P. Goldie, 539–559. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haybron, M.D. 2008. The pursuit of happiness: The elusive psychology of well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett, W. 1926. Essays, ed. C.H. Gray. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and time. Trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 1999. Contributions to philosophy (from Enowning). Trans. P. Emad and K. Maly. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 2002. Off the beaten track. Ed and Trans J. Young and K. Haynes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, A. 2009. A theory of feelings. Plymouth: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennezel, M. 1979. Intimate death. Trans. C.B. Janeway. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. et al. 2010. What happens when you die: Threee-to-four-year-olds chatting about death. In The wounded of mortality: Fear, denial, and acceptance of death, ed. S. Akhtar, 21–36. Lanham: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. 1884. What is an emotion? Mind 9: 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kekes, J. 2008. Enjoyment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, M. 2007. The history of death: Burial customs and funeral rites, from the ancient world to modern times. Guilford: The Lyons Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. 1998. The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G.J., and T.C. Bates. 2014. How genes influence personality. Journal of Research in Personality 51: 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, W. 1980. Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • May, T. 2009. Death. Montreal: McGill Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita, B., and H.Z. Markus. 2004. Culture and emotion: Models of agency as sources of cultural variation in emotion. In Feelings and emotions, ed. A.S.R. Manstead, N. Frijda, and A. Fischer, 341–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, John. “Happiness Quotes.” http://www.wisdomquotes.com/cat_happiness.html. Accessed 3 May 2010.

  • Murphy, G.F. 1993. Rationality and the fear of death. In The metaphysics of death, ed. J.M. Fischer, 41–58. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. 1986. Human all too human, vol. 1. Trans. R.J. Hollingdale. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. 1974. The gay science. Trans. W. Kaufman. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. 1968. The will to power. Trans. W. Kaufmann and R.J. Hollingdale. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. 2001. Upheavals of thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Opuku, K.A. 1989. African perspectives on death and dying. In Perspectives on death and dying, ed. A. Berger et al., 14–23. Philadelphia: The Charles Press, Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J. 1998. Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, E. 1994. Under the unpredictable plant. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 1961. The collected dialogues of Plato, ed. E. Hamilton and H. Cairns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, J.J. 2006. Is emotion a form of perception? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 36(Supplement [vol. 32]): 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, J.J. 2007. The emotional construction of morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R.C. 2003. Emotions: An essay in aid of moral psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. 2003a. Emotion, judgment, and desire. In Philosophy and the emotions: A reader, ed. S. Leighton, 117–126. Peterborough: Broadview Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. 2003b. Startle. In Philosophy and the emotions: A reader, ed. S. Leighton, 235–255. Peterborough: Broadview Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothmund, T., and A. Baumert. 2013. Shame on me: Implicit assessment of negative moral self-evaluation in shame-proneness. Social Psychological and Personality Science 00: 1–8. doi:10.1177/1948550613488950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabini, J., and M. Silver. 1987. Emotions, responsibility, and character. In Responsibility, character, and emotions: New essays in moral psychology, ed. F. Schoeman, 165–175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safer, J. 2008. Death benefits: How losing a parent can change an adult’s life—for the better. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, S., and J. Singer. 1962. Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional states. Psychological Review 69: 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, G.J. 1964. Martin Heidegger and the pre-socratics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soccio, D.J. 2007. Archetypes of wisdom, 6th ed. Belmont: Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.C. 1993. The passions. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. 2004. On the passivity of the passions. In Feelings and emotions, ed. A.S.R. Manstead, N. Frijda, and A. Fischer, 11–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J.P., J. Stuewig, and D.J. Mashek. 2007. Moral emotion as and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology 58: 345–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Versenyi, L. 1965. Heidegger, being, and truth. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, S. 2004. Humanity: An emotional history. London: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, R. 1990. Death: A history of man’s obsession and fears. New York: Barnes and Noble Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. 1993. Shame and necessity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiredu, K. 1989. Death and the afterlife in African culture. In Perspectives on death and dying, ed. A. Berger et al., 24–37. Philadelphia: The Charles Press, Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis R. Cooley .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cooley, D.R. (2015). How Should We Feel About Our Own Death?. In: Death’s Values and Obligations: A Pragmatic Framework. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 62. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7264-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics