Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consumption and Sustainability

  • Chapter
Sustainability Science

Abstract

Moving consumption toward sustainable patterns has been a key goal of sustainability science since the 1990s. However, a large knowledge gap remains between identified consumption problems that restrict social and ecological development and progress toward solutions. Unfortunately, “sustainable consumption” is generally discussed in a rational context and does not address how culture, pleasure, identity, and communication drive consumption. This exclusively rational framing limits innovation in problem-solving research methodologies based on the other drivers of consumption. Marketing, however, excels at capitalizing on all the drivers of consumption. Consumers are the targets of countless behavior change strategies, and this article offers perspective on how the nonrational drivers of consumption can be leveraged to instead pursue sustainable consumption. Bridging the behavior change knowledge gap can be relevant for many sustainability impasses, as many of them stem from human behavior, and boundary work drawing on behavioral science can effectively navigate norms and expectations at the interface of science and society. The better researchers understand the behaviors of relevant actors, the better their behavior change strategies will support sustainability transitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The sources highlighted with an asterisk (*) are recommended as further readings.

References

The sources highlighted with an asterisk (*) are recommended as further readings.

  • Aall C, Hille J (2010) Consumption – a missing dimension in climate policy. In: Bhaskar R (ed) Interdisciplinarity and climate change – transforming knowledge and practice for our global future. Routledge, London, pp 85–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels LM (2002) Beyond the running tally: partisan bias in political perceptions. Polit Behav 24(2):117–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum MA, Gussin P (2007) In the eye of the beholder: how information shortcuts shape individual perceptions of bias in the media. Q J Polit Sci 3(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beddoe R, Costanza R, Farley J, Garza E, Kent J, Kubiszewski I, Martinez L, McCowen T, Murphy K, Myers N, Ogden Z, Stapleton K, Woodward J (2009) Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: the evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(8):2483–2489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand M, Karlan D, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zinman J (2010) What’s advertising content worth? Evidence from a consumer credit marketing field experiment. Q J Econ 125(1):263–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassingham K (2006) Towel/sheet reuse program savings. Laudry Today, Sunday, 03 Dec 2006. Retrieved from: www.laundrytoday.com

  • *Cialdini RB (2009) Influence: science and practice, 5th edn. Pearson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MJ, Comrov A, Hoffner B (2005) The new politics of consumption: promoting sustainability in the American marketplace. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 1(1):58–76

    Google Scholar 

  • *Cohen MJ, Brown HS, Vergragt P (eds) (2013) Innovations in sustainable consumption –new economics, socio-technical transitions and social practices. Edward Elgar, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Derraik JG (2002) The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Mar Pollut Bull 44(9):842–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Gardner GT, Gilligan J, Stern PC, Vandenbergh MP (2009) Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:18452–18456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Downs JS, Loewenstein G, Wisdom J (2009) Strategies for promoting healthier food choices. Am Econ Rev 99(2):159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan M (2013) Nudge database. [Web log]. Retrieved from http://economicspsychologypolicy.blogspot.com/2013/03/nudge-database_3441.html

  • Field E (2009) Educational debt burden and career choice: evidence from a financial aid experiment at NYU law school. Am Econ Rev Appl 1(1):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • *Fischer J, Dyball R, Fazey I, Gross C, Dovers S, Ehrlich PR, Brulle RJ, Christensen C, Borden RJ (2012) Human behavior and sustainability. Front Ecol Environ 10(3):153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girod B, de Haan P (2009) GHG reduction potential of changes in consumption patterns and higher quality levels: evidence from Swiss household consumption survey. Energy Policy 37:5650–5661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girod B, Haan P, Scholz RW (2010) Consumption-as-usual instead of ceteris paribus assumption for demand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J Cons Res 35:472–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks AS, Just DR, Smith LE, Wansink B (2012) Healthy convenience: nudging students toward healthier choices in the lunchroom. J Public Health 34(3):370–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harriss R, Shui B (2010) Consumption, not CO2 emissions: reframing perspectives on climate change and sustainability. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 52(6):8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Heath C, Heath D (2010) Switch: how to change when change is hard. Broadway Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A (2010) The weirdest people in the world. Behav Brain Sci 33(2–3):61–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwich EG, Peters GP (2009) Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. Environ Sci Technol 43(16):6414–6420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Homonoff TA (2012) Can small incentives have large effects? The impact of taxes versus bonuses on disposable bag use. Job Market Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang H, Choi B, Lee MJ (2005) A model for shelf space allocation and inventory control considering location and inventory level effects on demand. Int J Prod Econ 97(2):185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson T, Jager W, Stagl S (2004) Beyond insatiability: needs theory, consumption and sustainability. In: Reisch L, Røpke I (eds) The ecological economics of consumption. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 79–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson E, Goldstein D (2003) Do defaults save lives? Science 302:1338–1339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: J Econometric Soc 47:263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallbekken S, Sælen H (2013) ‘Nudging’ hotel guests to reduce food waste as a win-win environmental measure. Econ Lett 119(3):325–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates R (2000) Sustainability science. Presentation at the world academies conference transition to sustainability in 21st century, Tokyo, Japan, 18 May 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol Bull 108(3):480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lott M (2013) Gov’t knows best? White house creates ‘nudge squad’ to shape behavior. FoxNews Politics. Retrieved from http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/30/govt-knows-best-white-house-creates-nudge-squad-to-shape-behavior/

  • Madrian BC, Shea DF (2001) The power of suggestion: inertia in 401 (k) participation and savings behavior. Q J Econ 116(4):1149–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R (2011) The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 6(1):42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhan B, Reifler J (2010) When corrections fail: the persistence of political misperceptions. Polit Behav 32(2):303–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2002) Policies to promote sustainable consumption: an overview, ENV/EPOC/WPNEP (2001)18/FINAL. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E, Janssen MA, Anderies JM (2007) Going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(39):15176–15178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pichert D, Katsikopoulos KV (2008) Green defaults: information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol 28(1):63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redlawsk DP (2002) Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. J Polit 64(04):1021–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich RB (2008) Supercapitalism: the transformation of business, democracy, and everyday life. Random House Digital, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin P, Scott S, Dingley M, Urbanek JK, Jiang H, Kaltenbach M (2011) Nudge to nobesity I: minor changes in accessibility decrease food intake. Judgm Decis Making 6(4):323–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer A, Crane A (2005) Addressing sustainability and consumption. J Macromarket 25(1):76–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz WP, Khazian AM, Zaleski AC (2008) Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Soc Influence 3(1):4–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz J, Riis J, Elbel B, Ariely D (2012) Inviting consumers to downsize fast-food portions significantly reduces calorie consumption. Health Aff 31(2):399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shang J, Basil DZ, Wymer W (2010) Using social marketing to enhance hotel reuse programs. J Bus Res 63:166–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg JH, Lorek S (2002) Environmentally sustainable household consumption: from aggregate environmental pressures to priority fields of action. Ecol Econ 43(2):127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC (1997) Toward a working definition of consumption for environmental research and policy. In: Stern PC, Dietz T, Ruttan VR, Socolow RH, Sweeney JL (eds) Environmentally significant consumption: research directions. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 12–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • *Thøgersen J, Schrader U (2012) From knowledge to action – new paths towards sustainable consumption. J Consum Policy 35(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley BE Jr, Kite ME (2012) Principles of research in behavioral science. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Foley RW, Guston DH (2012) Nanotechnology for sustainability – what does nanotechnology offer to address complex sustainability problems? J Nanopart Res 14(9):1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang MH (2001) An efficient algorithm to allocate shelf space. Eur J Oper Res 131(1):107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, 875502, Tempe, AZ, 85287-5502, USA

    John Harlow, Michael J. Bernstein & Arnim Wiek

  2. Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Weinbergstr. 56/58, CH-8092, Zürich, Switzerland

    Bastien Girod

Authors
  1. John Harlow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael J. Bernstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bastien Girod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arnim Wiek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Harlow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Sustainability Governance (INSUGO), Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany

    Harald Heinrichs

  2. Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Pim Martens

  3. Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany

    Gerd Michelsen

  4. School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA

    Arnim Wiek

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harlow, J., Bernstein, M.J., Girod, B., Wiek, A. (2016). Consumption and Sustainability. In: Heinrichs, H., Martens, P., Michelsen, G., Wiek, A. (eds) Sustainability Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7242-6_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation