Advertisement

A Poietic Force That Belongs to No One: Reflections on Art and Education from an Agambenian Perspective

  • Joris VliegheEmail author
Part of the Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education book series (COPT, volume 8)

Abstract

In this essay I explore the interrelationship between art and education from the perspective that in both spheres of life the capacity to bring newness into being is a central concern. With the help of Agamben’s genealogical account of Western art history I introduce an opposition between creation, an anonymous force to generate something that didn’t exist beforehand (‘poiesis’), and creativity as an individual and highly private characteristic which consists in an appropriation of this ‘poietic’ force. To make the importance of this distinction clear I turn to a particular period in Western art history, viz. Bracque and Picasso’s experiments with cubism. These can be seen as an answer to the crisis of representation which essentially consists in visualising on the canvas what it means that one can construct and create reality. This digression permits to draw some conclusions regarding contemporary tendencies in education to appropriate and suffocate this ‘poietic’ dimension.

Keywords

Artistic Creation Uncertain Object Original Power Traditional Realist Creative Genius 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Agamben, G. (1999a). The man without content (G. Albert, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agamben, G. (1999b). Potentialities. Collected essays in philosophy (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Agamben, G. (2003). Beauty that falls. In N. Dal Roscio (Ed.), Writings on Cy Twombly (p. 283). München: Shirmer/Mosel.Google Scholar
  4. Arendt, H. (1958a). The crisis in education. In Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Arendt, H. (1958b). The human condition. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  6. de la Duranteye, L. (2009). Giorgio Agamben. A critical introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against method. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. Lewis, T. E. (2011). The poetics of learning: Whitehead and Agamben on rhythm. Philosophy of Education Yearbook, 2011, 249–256.Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, T. E. (2013). On study: Giorgio Agamben and educational potentiality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Masschelein, J. (2001). The discourse of the learning society and the loss of childhood. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Masschelein, J., Simons, M., Bröckling, U., & Pongratz, L. (Eds.). (2007). The learning society from the perspective of governmentality. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Mollenhauer, K. (1983). Vergessene Zusammenhänge. Über Kultur und Erziehung. München: Juventa.Google Scholar
  13. Nash, J. M. (1999). Cubism, futurism and constructivism. In D. Britt (Ed.), Modern art. Impressionism to post-modernism (pp. 159–201). London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  14. Noland, C. (s.d.) Digital gestures. http://www.uiowa.edu/~poroi/seminars/nmtt/resources/noland.pdf (consulted 22 Oct 2013).
  15. Weil, S. (1962). Human personality (R. Rees, Trans.). In Selected essays (pp. 9–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Education, Community, and SocietyUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations