Advertisement

Introduction: Redistributing the Artistic and Pedagogical Sensible

  • Tyson E. LewisEmail author
  • Megan J. Laverty
Part of the Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education book series (COPT, volume 8)

Abstract

In this introduction we argue that there is an urgent need to think together the shared crisis found in arts education and in teaching more broadly conceptualized. In both cases, there is a consistent attack against the aesthetic dimensions of experience. We then outline how individual chapters in this collection can help us to appreciate the political, economic, social, and philosophical overlaps between the teachings of the arts and the art of teaching.

Keywords

Aesthetic Dimension Affective Intensity Absolute Movement Adequate Yearly Progress Aesthetic Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. (1983). Retrieved June 15, 2014, from the National Commission for Educational Reform website: http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html
  2. Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biesta, G. (2014). The beautiful risk of education. Boulder: Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bresler, L. (2007). International handbook of research in arts education, Part I-II. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dean, C., et al. (2010). 21st century skills map for the arts. Retrieved October 18, 2014, from the Partnership for 21st Century Skills website: http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_arts_map_final.pdf
  6. Dewhurst, M. (2014). Social justice art: A framework for activist art pedagogy. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  7. Egan, K. (1988). Imagination and education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  8. Egan, K. (1990). Romantic understanding: The development of rationality and imagination, ages 8–15. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Egan, K. (1992). Imagination in teaching and learning: The middle school years. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Eisner, E. W. (2004a). Arts and the creation of mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Eisner, E. W. (2004b). What can education learn from the arts about the practice of education? International Journal of Education & the Arts, 5(4). Retrieved June 1, 2014, from https://igea.asu.edu
  12. Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Gaudelius, Y., & Speirs, P. (2002). Contemporary issues in art education. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Giroux, H. (2010). Dumbing down teachers: Rethinking the crisis of public education and the demise of the social state. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 32(4/5), 339–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greene, M. (2000). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Greene, M. (2001). Variations on a blue guitar: The Lincoln Center Institute lectures on aesthetic education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hickman, R. (2011). The art and craft of pedagogy: Portraits of effective teachers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Holcomb, S. (2007). State of the arts. NEA Today, 25(4), 34–37.Google Scholar
  19. Kessler, R. (2011). Accelerating arts education funding cuts and loss of arts teachers paint grim picture for city schools. Retrieved June 10, 2014, from The Center for Arts Education website: http://www.cae-nyc.org/sites/default/files/docs/Research-Brief-Accelerating-Arts-Education-Cuts-June-2011.pdf
  20. Mahiri, J. (2005). From 3r’s to 3c’s: Corporate curriculum and culture in public schools. Social Justice, 32(3), 72–88.Google Scholar
  21. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. McNeil, L., & Valenzuela, A. (2000). Harmful effects of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric. In M. Kornhaber, G. Orfield, & M. Kurlander (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 89–123). New York: Century Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Moe, T. M. (2003). Politics, control, and the future of school accountability. In P. E. Peterson & M. R. West (Eds.), No child left behind? The politics and practices of school accountability (pp. 80–106). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.Google Scholar
  24. Preparing students for the next America. (2013). Retrieved June 9, 2014, from the Arts Education Partnership website: http://www.aep-arts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Preparing-Students-for-the-Next-America-FINAL.pdf
  25. Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  26. Rancière, J. (2006). Thinking between disciplines: An aesthetics of knowledge. Parrhesia, 1, 1–12.Google Scholar
  27. Rancière, J. (2010). The aesthetic unconscious. New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ruppert, S. S. (2006). Critical evidence: How the arts benefit student achievement. Retrieved June 9, 2014, from the Arts Education Partnership website: http://www.nasaa-arts.org/Research/Key-Topics/Arts-Education/critical-evidence.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Art EducationCollege of Visual Arts and Design, University of North TexasDentonUSA
  2. 2.Educational PhilosophyTeachers College, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations