Abstract
Present discussions of economic development often speculate whether the backward economies can utilize foreign capital so as to alter perceptibly and permanently their comparative cost advantages; and, if so, how intensive must be the impact of foreign capital for this to occur. Historical precedents indicate that foreign capital can be directly applied to expand certain types of exports. In addition to the past and present colonially dependent areas, the United States and Canada are often cited as outstanding examples. In these two countries, however, foreign capital contributed mainly to the expansion of exports of raw materials and agricultural products, while the elimination of the comparative disadvantage in manufactured goods was a long and complex process in which the availability of foreign capital was just one of many favorable factors. The circumstances surrounding economic development today are essentially different. The East European experience might help us to gain a better perspective on the timing and magnitude of capital imports necessary for a permanent modification of a country’s comparative costs. It would be especially enlightening to understand better what is required to expand the share of exports whose value depends mainly on special skills and round-about productive processes, rather than on crude labor and raw materials.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Hungary’s imports increased by about 400 million pengö or roughly 50 per cent between 1924 and 1928. About 140 million of this increase was due to an almost twofold rise of imports of investment goods and their component raw materials. The imports of consumer’s goods and their component raw materials increased approximately 14 per cent. This clearly indicates that the largest share of the increase in imports went into capital goods. A. Eckstein, Economic Development in Hungary, 1920 to 1950, Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley, 1952, p. 140.
Charles Rist, noting that Poland held a distinct position in the gold bloc because she was “successful” in her deflationary efforts to an unprecedented extent, observed: “It is necessary to emphasize that only the preponderance of agriculture... made it possible first to experiment with deflation, and, secondly, to carry it through without encountering any appreciable resistance on the part of the social classes on which it fell most heavily.” See his “Memorandum” in Joint Committee of the Carnegie Endowment and International Chamber of Commerce, International Economic Reconstruction (Paris, 1936), p. 173. He is basically correct since police reprisals against Ukrainians in agricultural Galicia had primarily a political and not economic basis. S. Horak, Poland and Her National Minorities, 1919-39 (New York: Vantage, 1961).
F. W. Paish, “Banking Policy and the Balance of International Payments,” Economica, Vol. III (N.S.), November 1936, pp. 404–422.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1964 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bandera, V.N. (1964). Economic Adjustments from the Standpoint of External Balances. In: Foreign Capital as an Instrument of National Economic Policy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6818-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6818-4_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-6727-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6818-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive