Abstract
One thing for which we should be grateful to Ribbentrop, Hitler declared once during the war, was that he understood the full significance of our pact with Japan and drew the conclusions of it with great lucidity.1 The Führer’s evaluation hardly corresponded with the facts, however, because his Foreign Minister was instrumental in almost wrecking the alliance in 1941. Even under the most favorable circumstances the German-Japanese entente was faced with serious problems, but added to these was a conspicuous misconception existing in both Berlin and Tokyo about their political relationship. The factors governing this association were thus complicated by many inter-allied disputes — a situation which tended to make this last year before Pearl Harbor a very full one indeed. Especially the Nazis labored under the impression that they were able to influence Japanese foreign policy. Von Ribbentrop’s excited cables to Ambassador Ott were, nevertheless, the product of his own imagination, and did not represent a truthful picture of Germany’s status with the Japanese. On the other hand, the Tokyo government was always eager to absorb the European colonial spoils after Germany had defeated the home countries. Rather than participate in the coalition’s struggles, the Japanese shrewdly sought to profit from Germany’s military efforts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hitler’s Secret Conversations, 1941–1944 (New York: Farrar, Straus and Young, 1953), p. 146.
Führer Conferences on matters dealing with the German Navy, 1941 (Washington: Office of Naval Intelligence, 1947), I, p. 4.
Ibid., I, pp. 12–19.
Ibid., I, pp. 32–33, 40–41.
Joseph C. Grew, Ten Years in Japan (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1944), p. 370.
International Military Tribunal for the Far East, Documents presented in Evidence, Exhibit 562 (hereafter cited as IMTFE).
IMTFE, Exhibit 569. Besides these clear indications Ambassador Kurusu had talked to Weizsäcker in January about Singapore, though in more cautious terms. Ibid., Exhibit 629. See also Joseph W. Ballantine, “Mukden to Pearl Harbor, ” Foreign Affairs, XXVII (July, 1949), pp. 651–664.
IMTFE, Exhibit 570.
International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals (Nuremberg: Secretariat of the Tribunal, 1948), XXVIII, doc. 1834PS.
IMTFE, Exhibit 572.
Ibid., Exhibit 1050.
H. L. Trefousse, Germany and American Neutrality, 1939–1941 (New York: Bookman Associates, 1951), pp. 94–95.
International Military Tribunal, op. cit., XXXIV, doc. 075 C.
Langer and Gleason, The Undeclared War, 1940–1941 (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1953), p. 318.
Koichi Kido, Extracts from the Diary of … . 1931–41 (Microfilmed by the University of California), February 1, 1941.
IMTFE, Exhibits 563, 564, 565, 566, 631, 3521, 3848, IPS docs. 1157, 3361, 4025.
See e.g. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1941 (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1956), IV, pp. 915–916; Sir Robert Craigie, Behind the Japanese Mask (London: Hutchinson & Co., Ltd., 1946), p. 115;
Toshikazu Kase, Journey to the Missouri (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950), p. 156.
Kido Diary, op. cit., February 1, 1941 ; Foreign Relations, 1941, op. cit., IV, p. 917.
IMTFE, Exhibit 3440; Kido Diary, op. cit., February 14, 1941.
IMTFE, Exhibits 2747, 3655, 3657. 21 Ibid., Exhibit 569.
Paul Schmidt, Statist auf diplomatischer Bühne, 1923–1945 (Bonn: Athenäum Verlag, 1949), p. 527.
IMTFE, Exhibit 575; Ernst von Weizsäcker, Memoirs (London: Victor Gollancz Ltd., 1951), pp. 249–250. This advice had also been given by Admiral Reader to the Führer, but with the same negative result as Directive 24 showed. See Führer Conferences, 1941, op. cit., I, pp. 32–33.
Interpreter Schmidt writes that with these words even Matsuoka’s face registered surprise, and made Ribbentrop realize he had gone too far. Schmidt, op. cit., p. 530.
Nazi-Soviet Relations, 1939–1941, edited by Sontag and Beddie (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1948), pp. 281–288.
This time it was Hitler’s face which could not hide its disappointment, and his disillusionment only increased when the Japanese announced that it might take from three to six months to prepare for an assault, Schmidt, op. cit., pp. 532–533.
Nazi-Soviet Relations, op. cit., pp. 289–298.
Ibid., pp. 298–303.
International Military Tribunal, op. cit., XXIX, doc. 1877PS. 30 Ibid., XXIX, docs. 1881PS, 1882PS.
See e.g. IMTFE, Exhibit 576.
Heinz Holldack, Was Wirklich Geschah (Munich: Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung, 1949), p. 270.
Führer Conferences, 1941, op. cit., I, p. 53.
Adolf Hitler, My New Order (New York: Reynal and Hitchcock, 1941), p. 985.
IMTFE, Exhibit 2735A; Holldack, op. cit., p. 271. See also Foreign Relations, 1941, op. cit., IV, p. 959.
Joachim von Ribbentrop, Zwischen London und Moskau (Leoni: Druffel Verlag, 1953), p. 241.
Foreign Relations of the United States; Japan: 1931–1941 (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1943), II, p. 141.
U.S. Congress Hearings, Pearl Harbor Attack (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1946), part XX, Exhibit 173, “Memoirs of Prince Konoye, ” p. 3986.
Kido Diary, op. cit., April 21, 1941.
Pearl Harbor Attack, op. cit., part XX, Exhibit 173, p. 3987.
Ibid., part XX, Exhibit 173, pp. 3988–3989.
Loc. cit.; IMTFE, IPS doc. 4059. 43 IMTFE, Exhibit 1075.
Ibid., Exhibit 2758; The Ciano Diaries, 1939–1943, edited by Hugh Gibson (New York: Doubleday & Co. Inc., 1946), May 2, 1941.
IMTFE, Exhibit 1073; Pearl Harbor Attack, op. cit., part XX, Exhibit 173, pp. 3990–3991.
IMTFE, Exhibit 1075.
Trials of War Criminals, The Ministries Case (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1952), XIV, p. 383.
Führer Conferences, 1941, op. cit., I, p. 67.
J.W. Gantenbein, Documentary Background of World War II (New York: Columbia University Press, 1948), pp. 743–744.
Pearl Harbor Attack, op. cit., part XX, Exhibit 173, p. 3991. 51 IMTFE, Exhibit 585.
Ibid., Exhibits 586, 635.
Grew, op. cit., pp. 393–394.
Kido Diary, op. cit., April 18, 1941; Foreign Relations, 1941, op. cit., IV, p. 355.
IMTFE, Exhibits 2735A, 3655.
Ibid., Exhibit 1068.
Ibid., Exhibit 1075.
Ibid., Exhibit 1090; Pearl Harbor Attack, op. cit., part XX, Exhibit 173, pp. 3989–3990.
IMTFE, Exhibit 2735A.
Ibid., Exhibit 3655; Kido Diary, op. cit., June 6, 1941.
IMTFE, Exhibits 635, 781.
Grew, op. cit., pp. 395–396.
Sir Robert Craigie, Behind the Japanese Mask (London: Hutchinson & Co. Ltd., 1946), p. 117.
IMTFE, Exhibits 2735A, 3655.
Pearl Harbor Attack, op. cit., part XX, Exhibit 173, pp. 3992–3993.
IMTFE, Exhibit 793; Kase, op. cit., pp. 166–168.
IMTFE, Exhibit 795A.
Les lettres secrètes échangées par Hitler et Mussolini (Paris: Editions du Pavois, 1946), p. 127.
IMTFE, Exhibit 1097.
Ibid., Exhibits 587, 1096; Foreign Relations, 1941, op. cit., IV, p. 356.
Gantenbein, op. cit., pp. 744–746.
Ribbentrop, op. cit., pp. 246–247, 248, 249. This theory was first put forward by the German historian Heinz Holldack, op. cit., pp. 262–263, 274. State Secretary Weizsäcker, op. cit., p. 262 writes that with the advent of the Tojo Cabinet in October, 1941, Hitler was actually worried that Japan might declare war against Soviet Russia, and so would be in Germany’s way were the U.S.S.R. suddenly to collapse.
Weizsäcker, op. cit., p. 256; “Die Anerkennung der Nanking Regierung durch die Achsenmächte, ” Ostasiatische Rundschau, XXII (July, 1941), pp. 139–140.
Kido Diary, op. cit., June 28, 1941 ; Langer and Gleason, op. cit., pp. 627–629. 75 Pearl Harbor Attack, op. cit., part XX, Exhibit 173, p. 4019. 76 Charles Willoughby, Shanghai Conspiracy; The Sorge Spy Ring (New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., 1952), p. 201.
Craigie, op. cit., p. 117.
IMTFE, Exhibit 636. 79 Ibid., Exhibit 1111.
Ibid., Exhibits 638, 799, 830. Ribbentrop was so frustrated that he sent Ott an angry cable, reminding him of Matsuoka’s declaration in May to intervene in case of a Russo-German war. Ibid., Exhibit 792.
Erich Kordt, Wahn und Wirklichkeit (Stuttgart: Union Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft, 1948), p. 313, note 1.
Pearl Harbor Attack, op. cit., part XX, Exhibit 173, pp. 3994–3997; Kido Diary, op. cit., July 14, 15, 16, 1941.
IMTFE, IPS doc. 4019.
Weizsäcker, op. cit., p. 261.
International Military Tribunal, op. cit., XXXI, docs. 2896PS, 2897PS. Ambassador Grew also noticed at this time a certain coolness in German-Japanese relations. Grew, op. cit., pp. 401–403.
Führer Conferences, 1941, op. cit., II, pp. 27–28.
IMTFE, IPS doc. 4033, 4053. See also Foreign Relations, 1941, op. cit., IV, pp. 1011–1012.
IMTFE, Exhibits 639B, 642, 800, 1114, 1121; Langer and Gleason, op. cit., pp. 641–642.
Ciano’s Diplomatic Papers, edited by M. Muggeridge (London: Odhams Press Ltd., 1948), p. 451.
Pearl Harbor Attack, op. cit., part XVIII, Exhibit 132A, pp. 2948–2951.
IMTFE, Exhibit 801 A.
Ibid., IPS doc. 3121 ; Trefousse, op. cit., p. 129. Germany’s proposal was of course also motivated by President Roosevelt’s order of September, 1941, to the Navy “to shoot on sight. ”
Foreign Relations of the United States: Japan, op. cit., II, p. 603; Grew, op. cit., p. 447; Chitoshi Yanaga, Japan since Perry (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1949), pp. 599–600.
Kido Diary, op. cit., September 26, 1941.
Pearl Harbor Attack, op. cit., part XII, Exhibit 1, pp. 44–45, 48–49.
IMTFE, Exhibit 788A, IPS doc. 4024.
H. S. Quigley, Far Eastern War, 1937–1941 (Boston: World Peace Foundation, 1942), p. 177.
Grew, op. cit., pp. 462–463; Weizsäcker, op. cit., p. 262.
IMTFE, IPS doc. 991; Pearl Harbor Attack, op. cit., part XII, Exhibit 1, p. 165; David J. Dallin, Soviet Russia and the Far East (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1948), p. 172.
IMTFE, Exhibit 3901, IPS doc. 3121; Peace and War — United States Foreign Policy, 1931–1941 (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1943), p. 773.
IMTFE, Exhibits 495, 1182, 3835.
Ibid., Exhibit 3440.
Ibid., Exhibits 588, 878, IPS doc. 991. 104 Kordt, op. cit., pp. 330–331.
IMTFE, Exhibits 601, 602.
International Military Tribunal, op. cit., XXXV, doc. 656D.
Ibid., XXXI, doc. 2898PS; Pearl Harbor Attack, op. cit., part XII, Exhibit 1, pp. 204–205.
IMTFE, Exhibit 588; Kido Diary, op. cit., December 1, 1941.
IMTFE, Exhibits 604, 3512; Pearl Harbor Attack, op. cit., part XII, Exhibit 1, pp. 204–205, 228–229; Ciano’s Papers, op. cit., pp. 465–467; Ciano Diaries op. cit., December 3, 1941.
IMTFE, Exhibit 3512; Ciano Diaries, op. cit., December 4, 1941; Langer and Gleason, op. cit., pp. 925–926; Alan Bullock, Hitler (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1953), pp. 607–608.
IMTFE, Exhibit 608; Kordt, op. cit., pp. 318, 330–332.
Elizabeth Wiskemann, The Rome-Berlin Axis (London: Oxford University Press, 1949), p. 263.
International Military Tribunal, op. cit., XXXV, doc. 657D; De Witt C. Poole, “Light on Nazi Foreign Policy, ” Foreign Affairs, XXV (October, 1946), p. 147.
“Die Reichstagrede des Führers, ” Ostasiatische Rundschau, XXII (December, 1941), p. 250.
Trefousse, op. cit., p. 153; see also H. L. Trefousse, “Germany and Pearl Harbor,” Far Eastern Quarterly, XI (November, 1951), pp. 35–50.
Admiral Raeder had foreseen this Japanese attitude and warned Hitler of it, Führer Conferences, 1941, op. cit., I, pp. 12–19.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1958 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Presseisen, E.L. (1958). Alliance Without Allies. In: Germany and Japan. International Scholars Forum. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6590-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6590-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-6456-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6590-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive