Abstract
One of the most important problems about which economists have professional knowledge is lagging productivity growth. After illustrating some significant developments this paper addresses three questions: (1) To what extent does R&D activity drive productivity growth, (2) how do alternative measures of productivity affect the conclusions and (3) how did the oil price shocks and the increased openness of the U.S. economy affect productivity growth? After removing the influence of the extremely dynamic computer industry, average manufacturing industry productivity in the U.S. throughout the 80s grew at a disappointing pace. And it didn’t improve in the most dynamic industries. But there is good news as well. First, part of the 1970s productivity slump is clearly attributable to the 1973–74 oil price shock. Second and more important, technological innovation does not appear to have lost its power in driving productivity growth forward. Indeed there is evidence of stronger and more consistent productivity effects from R&D investment during the 1980s, although the exact channels through which R&D enhances manufacturing sector productivity are left in doubt. Estimates of the role inter-industry technology flows play are sensitive to aggregation and the conventions used to construct the industry price deflators underlying productivity measures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baily, Martin N. and Robert J. Gordon (1988) `The Productivity Slowdown, Measurement Issues, and the Explosion of Computer Power’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, No. 2, 347–432.
Baumol, William J., Sue Anne Batey Blackman, and Edward N. Wolff (1989) Productivity and American Leadership: The Long View, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Denison, Edward E. (1989) Estimates of Productivity Change by Industry, Washington: Brookings. Flamm, Kenneth (1987) Targeting the Computer, Washington: Brookings.
Gray, Wayne B. (1989) `Productivity Database’, unpublished paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, June 1989.
Griliches, Zvi (1979) `Issues in Assessing the Contribution of RundD to Productivity Growth’, Bell Journal of Economics, 92–116.
Griliches, Zvi and Frank Lichtenberg (1984) `Interindustry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth: A Reexamination’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 324–329.
Jorgenson, Dale W. (1984) `The Role of Energy in Productivity Growth’, in John Kendrick (ed.), International Comparisons of Productivity and Causes of the Slowdown, Cambridge: Ballinger, pp. 270–323.
McCombie, J.S.L. (1987) ‘Verdoom’s Law’, in John Eatwell et al. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, London: Macmillan, vol. 4, pp. 804–806.
Nordhaus, William (1989) ‘Comment’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics, 320–325.
Pratten, Cliff (1980) ‘The Manufacture of Pins’, Journal of Economic Literature, 93–96.
Scherer, F.M. (1982) ‘Inter-Industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 627–634.
Scherer, F.M. (1984a) Innovation and Growth,Cambridge: MIT Press.
Scherer, F.M. (1984b) ‘Using Linked Patent and RundD Data To Measure Inter-Industry Technology Flows’, in Zvi Griliches (ed.), RundD, Patents, and Productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 417–461.
Scherer, F.M. (1986) ‘The World Productivity Growth Slump’, in Rolf Wolff (ed.), Organizing Industrial Development, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 15–27.
Scherer, F.M. (1992) International High-Technology Competition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Solow, Robert A. (1957) ‘Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 312–320.
Terleckyj, Nestor (1974) Effects of RundD on the Productivity Growth of Industries: An Explanatory Study, Washington: National Planning Association.
U.S. President (1992) Economic Report of the President, Washington: USGPO, February 1992.
Young, Allan H. (1989) ‘BEA’s Measurement of Computer Output’, Survey of Current Business, July 1989, pp. 108–115.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scherer, F.M. (1994). Lagging Productivity Growth: Measurement, Technology, and Shock Effects. In: Aiginger, K., Finsinger, J. (eds) Applied Industrial Organization. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6395-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6395-0_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4452-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6395-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive