Skip to main content

Portfolio Choice, Transactions Costs and Monopoly Power

  • Chapter
Applied Industrial Organization
  • 76 Accesses

Abstract

By using optimal stochastic control, where risk can be reduced by appropriate efforts, monopoly power is shown to engender reduced efforts to lower risk. It therefore gives rise to a relatively high ratio of liquid assets to net wealth. Furthermore, a decline in demand is shown to generally elicit increased efforts to reduce risk and thus yields an augmented share of risk bearing assets in the portfolio. These predictions are corroborated by invoking empirical evidence that pertains to West German industries. It thus appears that a capitalist economy is characterized by a built-in-mechanism stabilizing macroeconomic activity. This mechanism, however, is attenuated by monopoly power. That provides an additional rationale for competition policy.

Helpful comments on previous drafts by Armin Frisch, Rainer Klump, Doris Neuberger, Karl W. Roskamp, and F.A. Schmid are gratefully acknowledged. Jürgen Weigand provided excellent research assistance. Remaining errors are due to the author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beach, C. and J. McKinnon (1978), ‘A Maximum Likelihood Procedure for Regression with Auto-correlated Errors’, Econometrica 46, 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.E. and B.S. Yamey (1971), ‘Risk and Corporate Rates of Return: Comment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 85, 513–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, T.W. und M.J. Gordon (1991), ‘The Financial Consequences of Monopoly Power’, The Manchester School 59, 244–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Bundesbank (1979), Monatsberichte der Deutschen Bundesbank,November 1979 ff., Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurdle, G. (1974), ‘Leverage, Risk, Market Structure and Profitability’, Review of Economics and Statistics 56, 478–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M.I. and N.L. Schwartz (1981), Dynamic Optimization, New York: Elsevier (North Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1937), ‘The General Theory of Employment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 51, 209–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malliaris, A.G. and W.A. Brock (1982), Stochastic Methods in Economics and Finance, Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.C. (1969), ‘Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case’, Review of Economics and Statistics 51, 247–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, D. (1989), Finanzstruktur, Wettbewerb und Kapitalakkumulation, Frankfurt a.M. und New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M. (1989), ‘Market Size, Monopoly Power and Innovations under Uncertainty’, in D.B. Audretsch, L. Sleuwaegen, and H. Yamawaki (eds.), The Convergence of International and Domestic Markets, Amsterdam. Elsevier (North Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M., I. Böbel, and A. Haid (1979), ‘Profitability, Risk, and Market Structure in West German Industries’, Journal of Industrial Economics 27, 227–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M., I. Böbel, and A. Haid (1985), ‘Domestic Concentration, Foreign Trade and Economic Performance’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 3, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (1979), Statistisches Jahrbuchfiir die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, various issues, Stuttgart-Mainz: Verlag Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T.G. (1974), ‘Market Power, Profitability and Financial Leverage’, Journal of Finance 29, 1407–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T.G. (1978), ‘The Cost of Capital and the Market Power of Firms’, Review of Economics and Statistics 60, 209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. (1985), ‘Liquidity Preference as a Behaviour Towards Risk’, Review of Economic Studies 25, 165–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, D.N. (1977), ‘On the Relation Between Rates of Return, Risk and Market Structure’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 91, 1157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neumann, M. (1994). Portfolio Choice, Transactions Costs and Monopoly Power. In: Aiginger, K., Finsinger, J. (eds) Applied Industrial Organization. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6395-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6395-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4452-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6395-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics