Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Suppression of the Revolt and Its Aftermath

  • Chapter
The Peasants’ Revolt of Banten in 1888

  • 48 Accesses

Abstract

The western districts of the afdeling of Serang can be said to have formed part of the main area of insurrection in July 1888. Before the wave of revolt could reach the capital of the residency of Banten, the reaction from the side of the government was already in progress. As has been described in the preceding chapter, just as the surrounding country of Serang was about to flare up into general insurrection, the rebels received the distressing news that their main force had been dispersed. The signs of approaching disturbances at once died down, and no rising took place in Serang.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P.V. March 18, 1889 and Missive of the Resident of Banten, March 18, 1889, no. 82, in Exh. May 2, 1889, no. 63; also P.V. May 1, 1889 and Missive of the Resident of Banten, May 2, 1889, no 124, in Exh. June 24, 1889, no. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cable from the Resident of Banten to the Gov. Gen., July 9, 1888, no. 68, in MR 1888, no. 484; also Report of the Patrol Commander, July 14, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 496. See also Java Bode, July 10, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Report of the Patrol Commander, July 14, 1888; also Java Bode, July 18, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For the list of killed/wounded rebels, see Appendix VII.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The assailant was identified as Mesir from Ardjawinangun. He was a son of H. Wachia, the rebel of the 1850 rebellion; his sisters, Nji Aminah and Nji Rainah, and his nephew, a son of the latter, took an active part in the revolt; see note in P.V. March 26, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  6. IG (1891), no. 2, p. 1176.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Report DDI, p, 86; also Report of the Patrol Commander, July 14, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  8. IG (1891), no. 2, p. 1185; cf. Report of the Patrol Commander, July 14, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  9. IG (1891) no. 2, p. 1185.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gable from the Commander of the Navy to the Gov. Gen., July 12, 1888, no. 812, in MR 1888, no. 484; Report DDI, pp. 91–92.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Report of the Patrol Commander, July 14, 1888; Report DDI, pp. 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  12. IG (1891), no. 2, p. 1187.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Extract from the Military Journal (hereafter cited as M.J.) of the Commander of Troops in Banten, July 10, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 484; also Cable from the Commander of the Army to the Gov. Gen., July 10, 1888, no. 799, in MR 1888, no. 484.

    Google Scholar 

  14. IG (1891), no. 2, p. 1188. For the hostility of the people in the vicinity of Serang, see Cable from the Resident of Banten to the Gov. Gen., July 10, 1888, no. 73, in MR 1888, no. 484.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Cables from the Secretary of the Resident of Banten to the Gov. Gen., July 9, 1888, nos. 68, 69, 778; also July 10, 1888, no. 81, in MR 1888, no. 484.

    Google Scholar 

  16. IG (1891), no. 2, p. 1189; Missive of the Resident of Banten, Apr. 3, 1889, no. 96, in Exh. May 20, 1889, no. 76; also Missive of the Resident of Banten, May 2, 1889, no. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  17. IG (1891), no. 2, p. 1189.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.J. of the Military Commander at Serang, July 16 and 17, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 496.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Report DDI, p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  20. This Captain A. T. R. de Brauw, who headed the 2nd company of the 9th batallion was definitely not the same person as the above mentioned Lieutenant-Colonel C. A. de Brauw of 1850.

    Google Scholar 

  21. IG (1891), no. 2, p. 1191: M.J., July 11 and 12, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 484.

    Google Scholar 

  22. IG (1891), no. 2, p. 1192; M.J., July 11 and 12, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Extract M.J., July 11 and 12, 188. H. Abdulkarim’s house did not fall a prey to the fire despite the fact that it was located amidst the houses which had burnt down, see P.V. Jan. 23, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  24. IG (1891), no. 2, p. 1193; M.J., July 12 and 13, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 484.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Report DDI, p. 99; according to the author of the IG’s article, the number of captives amounted to 400; IG (1891), no. 2, p. 1194. Kedung and Trate Udik were burnt by order of the controller, de Chauvigny de Blot, see M.J. July 12 and 13, 1888; Gable from the Commander of the Army to the Gov. Gen., July 12, 1888, no. 826, in MR 1888, no. 484; Gable from the Resident of Banten to the Gov. Gen., July 12, 1888, no. 98, in MR 1888, no. 484; for the prohibition against burning down houses as issued by the central government, see Cable of the General Secretary, July 13, 1888 and Cable from the Resident of Banten to the Gov. Gen., July 14, 1888, no. 118, in MR 1888, no. 484.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cable from the Resident of Banten to the Gov. Gen., July 14, 1888, no. 115, in MR 1888, no. 484.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Extract M.J., July 12, 13 and 14, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 496.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Extract M.J., July 12 and 13, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 484.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Extract M.J., July 11 and 12, 1888; also Extract M.J., July 12, 13 and 14, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Extract M.J., July 14, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 496.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Extract M.J., July 12, 13 and 14, 1888; also Report DDI, p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Extract M.J., July 17, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 496; inggih means yes.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See above, Chap. VII, pp. 230–232.

    Google Scholar 

  34. The Commander of the Army to the Gov. Gen., July 12, 1888, no. 457, in MR 1888, no. 484.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Extract M.J., July 12, 13 and 14, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cable from the Resident of Banten to the Gov. Gen., July 19, 1888, no. 169, in MR 1888, no. 496; see also Extract M.J. July 19, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 506.

    Google Scholar 

  37. For H. Wasid’s retreat to Gunung Gede, see P.V. Dec. 6, 1888; also Report DDI, p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Many of the descendants of H. Wachia of the 1850 revolt were living at Ardjawinangun, formerly called Medang Batu; besides those mentioned under note 5, there were Sakib (son-in-law to H. Wachia, married to Nji Rainah) and Abdurrachman (son of Sakib) ; see P.V. March 26, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Extract M.J., July 18, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 506; Report DDI, pp. 104–105.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Extract M.J., July 18, 1888; the number of the rebels was estimated at 30 to 40 men; according to Report DDI, about 40 to 50 men; see Report DDI, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Extract M.J., July 18, 1888; Report DDI, p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Extract M.J, July 18, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Extract M.J, July 18, 1888; Report DDI, p. 110.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Extract M.J, July 20, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 506; Report DDI, p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Extract M.J, July 18, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Extract M.J, July 19, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 506.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Extract M.J, July 18, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Report DDI, pp. 111–112.

    Google Scholar 

  49. See above, note 4 and 5; also note 38.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Report DDI, p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  51. See above, Chap. IV, especially with reference to the rebellion of 1845.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Report of the Controller of Serang, May 19, 1889, no. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  53. P.V. Dec. 6, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  54. As to the supply of food, it was taken care of by H. Rapali, Panghulu of Balagendung, see P.V. Jan. 3, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Extract M.J., July 17, 1888; also P.V. July 17, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 496.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Extract M.J., July 22 and 23, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 506; see also Java Bode, July 23 and 26, 1888. 57 Extract M.J. July 26, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 506; also Gable from the Resident of Bauten to the Gov. Gen., July 26, 1888, no. 221, in MR 1888, no. 506.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Extract M. J., July 27, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 523; Report DDI, pp. 122–124. See also Java Bode, Aug. 3, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Extract M.J., July 21, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 506.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Extract M.J., July 23, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 506.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Java Bode, July 20 and 26, 1888; also Aug. 3, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Extract M.J., July 23, 1888; Report DDI, pp. 115–116.

    Google Scholar 

  62. See WNI (1889–1890), pp. 1201–1202; Tjaringin was also called kebun maung, i.e. tiger land. See Pleyte, in TBG, Vol. LII (1910), p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Report DDI, p. 115; for the goal of the journey, see Extract M.J. July 25, 1888 (in MR 1888, no. 506), where it is mentioned as being Djungkulon.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Extract M.J., July 22 and 24, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 506.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Extract M.J., July 25, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Extract M.J., July 26, 1888; Report DDI, p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Report DDI, p. 106; see also Extract M.J., July 29, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 523.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Extract M.J., July 29, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Extract M.J., July 30, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 523; Report DDI, p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Extract M.J., July 28, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 523.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Extract M.J., July 28 and 29, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Extract M.J., July 29, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Extract M.J., July 30, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Java Bode, Aug. 3, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Report DDI, pp. 127–128.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Extract M.J., Aug. 1, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 556.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Report DDI, pp. 129–130.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Extract M.J., Aug. 1, 1888; Java Bode, Aug. 3, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Extract M.J., Aug. 1, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ibidem; also Report DDI, p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Report DDI, p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Extract M.J., Aug. 1, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Missive of the Consul of Djeddah, Nov. 25, 1891, no. 700, in Vb. May 9, 1892, no. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Missive of the Consul of Djeddah, Nov. 26, 1888, no. 797/19.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Report DDI, p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  91. In order to avoid retaliation witnesses remained anonymous and did not testify at a public trial; see information given by spies A and D with reference to 19 suspects, in Exh. June 24, 1889, no. 76; see also Missive of the Resident of Bauten, Sept. 24, 1889, no. 297, in Exh. Nov. 23, 1889, no. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Mary Bachet testified against H. Rapali, H. Isra, Ikan and Samad; see P.V. Jan. 3, 1889; against H. Ramidin, H. Muhidin, H. Endung, H. Halari, H. Deli and H. Mardjaja, see P.V. Jan. 23, 1889; against H. Asim and H. Munib, see P.V. Jan. 30, 1889. Dumas’ wife testified against Otong and Entje Mohamad Said, see P.V. Jan. 15, 1889; against H. Muhidin, H. Endung, H. Halari and H. Mardjaja, P.V. Jan. 23, 1889; against: H. Djapi and H. Ali, see P.V. Jan. 30, 1889; against Pakur, see P.V. March 26, 1889. See also their testimony against Samidin, in IWR, No. 1336 (1889); also No. 1337 (1889).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Snouck Hurgronje, in VGS Vol. IV, part 2 (1924), p. 426.

    Google Scholar 

  94. See Snouck Hurgronje’s note on conditions in Banten, Aug. 15, 1892.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Most of the minutes of the court give evidence of the scarcity of confessions made by captives on trial; see P.V. Dec. 6, 1889; Jan. 3, 1889; Jan. 15, 1889; Jan. 23, 1889; Jan. 30, 1889; March 8, 1889; March 26, 1889; Apr. 3, 1889; Apr. 9, 1889; May 1, 1889; May 16, 1889; June 3, 1889; June 11, 1889 and Sept. 23, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  96. There was also a strong belief that the murids, if they did not retaliate on behalf of their kjais, might be cursed. See IG (1891), no. 2, p. 1202. The cattle plague which succeeded the rebellion was regarded as a curse of Allah upon the Banten population because they had not yet extinguished the kafirs (infidels); see WNI (1889–1890), p. 1534.

    Google Scholar 

  97. See O.I.B. Dec. 27, 1888, no. 1; O.I.B. Jan. 21, 1889, no. 2; O.I.B. Jan. 31, 1889, no. 1; O.I.B. Feb. 5, 1889, no. 1; O.I.B. Feb. 13, 1889, no. 1; O.I.B. March 24, 1889, no. 4; O.I.B. Apr. 10, no. 20; O.I.B. Apr. 15, 1889, no. 10; O.I.B. May 1, 1889, no. 1; O.I.B. May 8, 1889, no. 5; O.I.B. May 27, 1889, no. 12; O.I.B. June 18, 1889, no. 1; O.I.B. July 8, 1889, no. 80; O.I.B. Oct. 11, 1889, no. 8. 99 Ibidem; see also Appendix IX.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Koloniaal Verslag, 1889, Chap. C, p. 4; no mention is made of the rest of the arrested “rebels”.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Java Bode, June 22, 1889; De Locomotief, June 17 and 21, 1889. See also WNI (1888–1889), pp. 1532–1533, 1747–1750.

    Google Scholar 

  100. De Locomotief, July 18, 1889; WNI (1888–1889), pp. 1887–1888.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Missive of the Resident of Banten, June 26, 1889, no. 227, in MR 1889, no. 437. A Djajadiningrat (1936), p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Java Bode, June 22, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  103. WNI (1888–1889), pp. 1887–1888.

    Google Scholar 

  104. WNI (1888–1889), p. 1749.

    Google Scholar 

  105. WNI (1888–1889), pp. 1749–1750; for the lively debate about the death penalty in the press, see TNI (1889), no. 1, pp. 217–224.

    Google Scholar 

  106. The Minister of Colonies to the Gov. Gen., Feb. 28, 1889, F3/ no. 12. See also Missive of the Gov. Gen. to the Minister of Colonies, May 7, 1889, M7.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Bataviaasch Handelsblad, June 14, 1889; WNI (1888–1889), pp. 1532–1533; 1642–1643; 1771. See also Missive from the Gov. Gen. to the Minister of Colonies, June 15, 1889, no. 1079, in Exh. July 22, 1889, no. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Missive of the Resident of Banten, Sept. 19, 1888, no. 69, in MR 1888, no. 647. See also Java Bode, Oct. 8, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Missive of the Resident of Banten, Sept. 19, 1888, no. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Missive of the Resident of Banten, Nov. 26, 1888, no. 13/24 in MR 1888, no. 802.

    Google Scholar 

  111. IG (1891), no. 2, p. 1203.

    Google Scholar 

  112. O.I.B. March 24, 1889, no. 4 and O.I.B. June 18, 1889, no. 1; see also P.V. March 18, 1889; P.V. June 3, 1889 in Exh. July 24, 1889, no. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  113. O.I.B. Oct. 11, 1889, no. 8; P.V. Sept. 23, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Note from the Ambulatory Court to the Resident of Banten, Sept. 13, 1889, in Exh. Nov. 23, 1889, no. 65; also O.I.B. Oct. 11, 1889, no. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Note from the Ambulatory Court to the Resident of Banten, Sept. 13, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  117. O.I.B. Oct. 11, 1889, no. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  118. In his confession H. Abdulsalam mentioned the following people: H. Abdulgani, H. Kalipudin, and Mohamad Arip, all from Bedji; H. Dung, Ardja, Djafar; see H. Abdulsalam’s letter to the Resident of Banten (n.d.), in Exh. June 7, 1889, no. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  119. O.I.B. May 1, 1889, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  120. See Appendix D of Report DDL

    Google Scholar 

  121. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  123. P.V. Dec. 6, 1889; P.V. Jan. 3, 1889; P.V. Jan. 15, 1889; P.V. Jan. 30, 1889; P.V. March 26, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  124. O.I.B. Nov. 9, 1888, no. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Gable from the Resident of Kediri to the Gov. Gen., Aug. 11, 1888, no. 333, in Vb. Nov. 21, 1888, no. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Gable from the Resident of Kediri to the Gov. Gen., Aug. 15, 1888, no. 492 and Aug. 18, 1888, no. 503, in Vb. Nov. 21, 1888, no. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Report of the Commander of the Army to the Gov. Gen., Aug. 18, 1888, no. 614, in Vb. Nov. 21, 1888, no. 10. See also Java Bode, Sept. 8 and 15, 1888; cf. IG (1889), no. 2, pp. 1783–1785.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Missive of the Resident of Surakarta, Aug. 16, 1888, no. 42, in MR 1888, no. 578; Gable of the Commander of the Army, Aug. 17, 1888, no. 234, in Vb. Nov. 21, 1888, no. 10, referring to rumours about the coming disturbances among the population in Semarang. See also Groneman (1891), p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Missive of the Resident of Kediri, Aug. 16, 1888, no. 38, in MR 1888, no. 578; the name Herutjokro is traditionally adopted by the Ratu Adil-to-be; see Wiselius, in BKI, Vol. XIX (1872), pp. 172–217; Brandes, in TBG, Vol. XXXII (1889), pp. 368–430.

    Google Scholar 

  130. The messianic figure is usually named Ratu Adil; for the name Sultan Adil, see Missive of the Resident of Kediri, Aug. 16, 1888, no. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Lodojo is well-known as a place of exile during the period of the Mataram kingdom; it is situated south of Blitar (Kediri); see ENI, II (1918).

    Google Scholar 

  132. This name seems to be an abbreviation of Kjai Mohamad Mukiar; see Groneman (1891), p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  133. For an account of the court intrigues around Gusti Mohamad, see Groneman (1891), pp. 220–222.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Cable of the Resident of Kediri, Aug. 15, 1888, no. 492.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Missive of the Resident of Kediri, Aug. 16, 1888, no. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  138. For extensive studies about the Ratu Adil figure, see Wiselius, in BKI, Vol. XIX (1872), pp. 172–217; Brandes, in TBG, Vol. XXXII (1889), pp. 368–430; Drewes (1925), pp. 130–137; Schrieke (1959), pp. 76–95. See also Pigeaud (MS, 1943–1945), pp. 146 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Gable of the Resident of Kediri to the Gov. Gen., Aug. 15, 1888, no. 492; Aug. 18, 1888, no. 503; in Pasuruan, Kasanamat was arrested, see Gable of the Resident of Pasuruan, Aug. 16, 1888, no. 238, in Vb. Nov. 21, 1888, no. 10; in Banjumas, 5 people were arrested, see Cable of the Resident of Banjumas, Aug. 18, 1888, no. 103, in MR 1888, no. 578. See also Report of the Resident of Kediri, Oct. 18, 1888, no. 52, in MR 1888, no. 740.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Circular letter of the General Secretary, Aug. 21, 1888, no. 135, in Vb. Nov. 21, 1888, no. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Groneman (1891), p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Groneman (1891), p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Report of the Controller of Serang, May 19, 1889, no. 16; see also Missive of the Resident of Madiun, Sept. 20, 1889, La UI; cf. Henny’s article in IG (1921), no. 2, pp. 825–826. In 1905, Henny, Consul at Djeddah, made mention of the fact that shortly after the outbreak of the Banten revolt a certain H. Mardjuki settled in Warungdjajeng (Kediri) for some time. Henny’s assumption was that this man was the same H. Mardjuki mentioned by Snouck Hurgronje in his Mekka and thus one of the chief rebels of the Banten revolt. Cf. Chap. VI, note 63, p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  146. See above, Chap. VI, p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  147. WNI (1889–1890), p. 1311.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Groneman (1891), p. 69; Missive of the Resident of Surakarta, Aug. 16, 1888, no. 42. Originally the Bantenese plotters had also planned to launch the revolt at about this time; see Report of the Controller of Serang, May 19, 1889, no. 16. Snouck Hurgronje referred to Djajabaja prophecies in his advice of Jan. 14, 1889, in Vb. Jan. 25, 1889, no. 19. Cf. Cable of the Resident of Jogjakarta, July 1, 1878, no. 68, in MR 1878, no. 452.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Report of the Resident of Surakarta, Oct. 12, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 776; De Locomotief, Oct. 15, 1888; Java Bode, Oct. 18 and Nov. 1, 1888; IG (1889), no. 1, p. 216; no. 2, p. 1776; Koloniaal Verslag, 1889, column 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wonogiri (Surakarta), Indonesien

    Sartono Kartodirdjo

Authors
  1. Sartono Kartodirdjo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr W. F. Wertheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1966 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kartodirdjo, S., Wertheim, W.F. (1966). The Suppression of the Revolt and Its Aftermath. In: The Peasants’ Revolt of Banten in 1888. Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, vol 50. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6357-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6357-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-6351-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6357-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation