Skip to main content

Consilivm Cvivsdam ex Animo Cvpientis Esse Consvltvm et Romani Pontificis Dignitati et Christianae Religionis Tranqvillitati

  • Chapter
Erasmi Opuscula

Abstract

As we have already seen, Erasmus had carefully prepared the way for the proposal that the Lutheran affair be settled by a court of arbitration 1). In the Consilium cuiusdam the plan, hitherto expressed only in general terms, appeared for the first time in a definite and practicable form. It marked the consummation of the Erasmian policy, the point toward which the humanist had been working for the preceding two years. Yet the name of Erasmus did not appear in connection with the Consilium; nor did he ever assume full responsibility for it. For several reasons he did not wish it to appear that he had taken the initiative in originating the scheme. His safety had already been threatened by the inquisitors, and he wished to avoid the necessity of presenting the plan in person at Worms 2). Moreover, his neutrality had been compromised, despite his protests that he knew and cared nothing about Luther, by the indiscreet publication of some of his letters and by the noticeable similarity of his works to those of the reformer. Aleander and many others considered him the guiding spirit of the new movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. See AAL Introd.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. C. Schlottmann: Erasmus redivivus, 1883–9, I, 227.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See a careful study by N. Paulus: Die deutschen Dominikaner im Kampfe gegen Luther, 1903, pp. 292–313; Ep. 1149 Introd.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. Ep. 1150, 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ep. 1156, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. Spongia aduersus aspergines Hutteni, LB, X, 1648, A.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Heumann: Documenta literaria varii argumenti, 1758, p. 87 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. Aleander’s dispatch of 15 April 1521, T. Brieger: Aleander und Luther, 1g21, 1884, p. 139; and an Ep. of Raphael de Medici, 22 Jan. 1521, P. Kalkoff: Brief e, Depeschen und Berichte über Luthér vom Wormser Reichstage, 1521, 1898, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paulus, p. 296; cf. Die Vadianische Briefsammlung der Stadtbibliothek St. Gallen, ed. E. Arbenz and H. Wartmann, 1890–1908, Ep. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ep. 1196, 126–30; cf. CND 313 n.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Epp. 1149–52, 3–8 Oct. 1520.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ep. 1156.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cf. Ax Introd.; Capito to Luther, 20 Dec. 1521, Luther’s Briefwechsel, ed. E. L. Enders and G. Kawerau, 1884–1915, III, 259 f.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. Smith, p. 230; P. Kalkoff: Die Vermittlungspolitik des Erasmus und sein Anteil an den Flugschriften der ersten Reformationszeit, 1903, p. 19 ff; Ep. 1118 Introd.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Ep. 1203, 22–30, to Louis Ber, 14 May 1521:„Adnixus sum, cum essem Coloniae, vt Lutherus auferret laudem obedientiae, Pontifex clementiae: et placebat regibus quibusdam consilium. Et ecce incendium Decretalium, Captiuitas Babylonica, Assertiones illae nimium fortes reddiderunt malum, vt videtur, immedicabile. Sic mihi videtur agere Lutherus quasi seruari nolit. .... Quod vnum superest, mi Bere, precor vt Christus Opt. Max. omnia vertat in bonum; solus enim ille potest.“ Cf. Ep. 1199, 25–6; Faber to Vadian, 24 July 1521, Vadianische Brief sammlung, Ep. 268.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cf. Epp. 1186, 7; 1217, 36–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cf. Kalkoff: Vermittlungspolitik, p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ep. 1161, 3 Nov. 1520.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See especially Epp. 1183; 1185–7; 1191; 1195; 1202–3; 1217.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ep. 1192, 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Quoted in V. L. von Seckendorf: Commentarius historicus et apologeticus de Lutheranismo, 1692, I, 145.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reproduced in A. Wrede: Deutsche Reichstagsakten unter Kaiser Karl V., 1896, II, 484.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cf. Paulus, p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cf. Hutten’s Expostulatio, 1523, in E. Böcking: Ulrichs von Hutten Schriften, 1859–69, II, 212; Faber to Vadian, 24 July 1521, Vadianische Briefsammlung, Ep. 268; Paulus, p. 311.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid. p. 312.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cf. to Botzheim, 13 August 1529, LB, III, 1228; to Kretz, 11 March 1531, LB, III, 1362, F.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ep. 1199, 31; cf. LB, III, 1412, C. Erasmus asserted that it was still in MS. when he was at Cologne. Ep. 1199, 25. By 8 Feb. 1521 it was circulating at Worms, as on that date Aleander sent a copy to Rome. Brieger, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  28. For the Latin editions, see note on texts, infra; for the German translations, see G. Finsler: Zwingli Bibliographie, 1897, p. 80 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Paulus, p. 303; cf. Ep. 1217, 39: „Id quoque nescio quo casu vulgatum est a Germanis.“

    Google Scholar 

  30. Luther to Spalatin, 14 May 1521, Enders, III, 153.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brieger, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cratander to Vadian, 8 March 1521, Vadianische Briefsammlung, Ep. 247.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cf. Epp. 1199, 33–4; 1217, 17; LB, III, 1412, C.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Finsler, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cf. Paulus, p. 304 for list of authors.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See J. K. Mörikofer: Zwingli, 1867, I, 346; R. Staehelin: Zwingli, 1895, I, 197; Huldreich Zwinglis sdmtliche Werke, ed. E. Egli and G. Finsler, 1905 seqq., I, 434.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. C. L. Gieseler: Lehrbuch der Kirchengeschichte, III, 1884, 1, 87; Schlottmann, I, 228 ff; L. Geiger in Archiv für Litteraturgeschichte, V, 1876, pp. 555–67; W. Maurenbrecher: Geschichte der katholischen Reformation, 1880, I, 397; A. Meyer: Étude critique sur les relations d’Érasme et de Luther, 1909, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  38. O. cit., p. 304 ff; his ascription is accepted in Wrede, II, 1007; and Smith, p. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Epp. 1199, 34–7, to Marlianus, 15 April 1521; 1217, 35–56, to the theologians at Louvain, June 1521; Spongia, LB, X, 1648, B.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See Epp. 1203, 23–4, to Louis Ber, 14 May 1521 (quoted above) ; and 1690, 57–9, to Faber himself, c. 16 April 1526: „Statim in initio clamabam theologos ac monachos adiuuare causam Lutheri, non sum auditus. Mox ostendi viam finiendi mali, reiectum est consilium.“

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kalkoff: Vermittlungspolitik, p. 12 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  42. See notes.

    Google Scholar 

  43. The oration is in M. Freber: Rerum Germanicarum Scriptores, ed. Struve, 1727, II, 721–43; see his letters in Vadianische Briefsammlung, Epp. 184; 191; 200; 236; 268.

    Google Scholar 

  44. See the account of his sermon at Worms, Kalkoff: Briefe, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Seckendorf, I, 145.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wrede, II, 484.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cf. CC 135–6 n.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ep. 1149 Introd.

    Google Scholar 

  49. LB, X, 1648, B.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1933 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ferguson, W.K. (1933). Consilivm Cvivsdam ex Animo Cvpientis Esse Consvltvm et Romani Pontificis Dignitati et Christianae Religionis Tranqvillitati. In: Erasmi Opuscula. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6218-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6218-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5795-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6218-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics