Skip to main content

Acta Academiae Lovaniensis Contra Lvthervm

  • Chapter
Erasmi Opuscula
  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

At the time when Erasmus’ reform programme, which we have considered in connection with the Dialogus bilinguium ac trilinguium, was bringing him into conflict with the monks and theologians, the situation was made much more difficult for him by the appearance of Martin Luther on the stage of Christendom. The reform movement led by the friar of Wittenberg was to bring about a crisis in the life of Erasmus, as in that of the Catholic Church — a crisis scarcely more welcome to the one than to the other. The relation of Erasmus to Luther has been much discussed 1). For long an enigma, because of the apparent impossibility of understanding a middle-course policy in the absorbing struggle of the sixteenth century, his conduct has at last found adequate interpretation by modern scholars 2). The problem was rendered more difficult by the efforts of Erasmus himself to cover up the traces of his activity during the critical years before Worms. The three Reformation tracts, the Acta, the Axiomata and the Consilium cuiusdam, are therefore of great value as aids in determining his actual policy at that time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aside from the biographies of Erasmus and the general histories of the period, see A. Meyer: Étude critique sur les relations d’Érasme et de Luther, 1909; E. König: „Erasmus und Luther,” in Historisches Jahrbuch, XLI, 1921, pp. 52–75; P. Kalkoff: Erasmus, Luther und Friedrich der Weise, 1919; Die Vermittlungspolitik des Erasmus und sein Anteil an den Flugschriften der ersten Reformationszeit, 1903; M. Richter: Die Stellung des Erasmus zu Luther, 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See especially Smith, pp. 209–56; A. Humbert: Les Origines de la Théologie Moderne, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. Ep. 1127, 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. Luther to John Lang, 1 March 1517, P. Smith: Luther’s Correspondence, 1913–18, Ep. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For discussion of the fundamental disagreement of the sixteenth century disciples of Jerome and Augustine, see Humbert, pp. 224–66; HV Introd.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cf. Ep. 1144, 2–3, to Chieregato, 13 Sept. 1520: „Fortasse paucis aeque dolet hic Lutheri tumultus ac mihi; quem vtinam aut initio potuissem excludere aut nunc componere !”

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. Ep. 1039.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cf. Epp. 785, 37; Luthers Brie f wechsel, ed. E. L. Enders and G. Kawerau, 1884–1915, Ep. 92; Kalkoff: Erasmus, p. 24 ff; Smith, p. 216.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Epp. 872, 12–25; 877, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Humbert, p. 247 ff; Luther disapproved of Erasmus’ levity and had also, as early as 1516, protested against his interpretation of the Pauline doctrine of faith. See Enders, I, 63 f; cf. Smith, p. 214 f.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ep. 910.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ep. 933.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kalkoff: Erasmus, p. 33 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ep. 938.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ep. 939; cf. Ax. Introd.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ep. 980; cf. Kalkoff: Erasmus, p. 48 ff; Meyer, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ep. 1033; cf. Kalkoff: Erasmus, pp. 66–83, for full discussion of this second „manifesto” ; but see Ep. 1152.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Epp. 967; 961; 1062; etc.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, p. 219.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cf. Ep. 1161, 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cf. Epp. 961, 25–33; 967, 135–44; 1225, 106–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cf. P. Kalkoff: Die Anfänge der Gegenreformation in den Niederlanden, 1903, p. 61 ff; CND Introd.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ep. 967, 69–70; cf. Epp. 1143, 8–11; 1204, 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cf. Ep. 967, 92–3.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ep. 1007.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cf. Epp. 1040, 2–5; 1157, 9–12; 1167, 268–78.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Epp. 939, 66–99; 947, 34; 967, 78; 993, 44–47; 1033, 38–40; 1143, 13–14; 1164, 63–4.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cf. Epp. 1040, 2–4; 1153, 101–17; 1162, 174–6.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Crotus Rubeanus to Luther, 5 Dec. 1520, Enders, III, 8 f; cf. Kalkoff: Anfänge, I, 74; and in Zeitschrif t für Kirchengeschichte, XXXI, 1910, pp. 48–65.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cf. AQR 1206 n; CND Introd.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cf. Epp. 1113; 1119, 26–41; Spongia aduersus aspergines Hutteni. LB, X, 1659, A.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Epp. 1125; 1143; 1144; 1149–52; 1156–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cf. Kalkoff: Vermittlungspolitik, p. 58 ff; and „Erasmus und seine Schüler W. Nesen und Nicolaus von Herzogenbusch im Kampfe mit den Löwener Theologen,” in Huldreich Zwinglis sämtliche Werke, ed. E. Egli and G. Finsler, 1905 seqq., VII, 402–20.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cf. Kalkoff: Vermittlungspolitik, p. 25; Aleander gegen Luther, 1908, p. 38 ; Ep. 1 155 Introd.

    Google Scholar 

  36. H. de Jongh: L’Ancienne Faculté de Théologie de Louvain, 1911, p. 228 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See V. L. von Seckendorf: Commentarius historicus et apologeticus de Lutheranismo, 1692, I, 125.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cratander to Vadian, 8 March 1521, Die Vadianische Brief sammlung der Stadtbibliothek St. Gallen, ed. E. Arbenz and H. Wartmann, 1890–1908, Ep. 247.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pp. 23–58. The parallel passages cited by Kalkoff have been used in the notes without further acknowledgment.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Smith, p. 231; Meyer, p. 48. It had already been ascribed to Erasmus by M. Schuler and J. Schulthess in Zwinglii Opera, 1832, III, 2, but without proof. Allen concludes that Ep. 1153 must at least have been in the hands of the author of the Acta. Cf. AAL 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  41. De Jongh, p. 240 f; cf. M. Luther: Opera latina varii argumenti, ed. H. Schmidt, 1865, IV, 308. See CND Introd.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Enders, Epp. 290; 291; cf. Smith: Luther’s Correspondence, Epp. 241; 242.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cf. Kalkoff: Vermittlungspolitik, p. 23 f.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cf. Kalkoff: Vermittlungspolitik, pp. 59; 69.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Reprinted, ibid. p. 82 f.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1933 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ferguson, W.K. (1933). Acta Academiae Lovaniensis Contra Lvthervm. In: Erasmi Opuscula. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6218-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6218-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5795-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6218-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics