Skip to main content
  • 64 Accesses

Abstract

Investment is part of output, and at the same time a means to increase output. This dual relationship was systematically studied, for the first time by Harrod and Domar [23, 16, 24].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes to Chapter V

  1. The use of the same letter for two different variables cannot well be avoided altogether, the number of letters in the alphabet being limited. Hence the letter p, now means production, and also means price in some other sections. It is hoped that confusion is avoided by classifying the material into separate sections.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harrod and Domar did not in fact use period analysis but used the symbol A for increment, without specifying the precise time pattern.

    Google Scholar 

  3. For a more detailed analysis of the interaction between multiplier models and technical change, see Robinson [44], in particular the note ‘Mr. Harrod’s Dynamics’ on p. 404.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Once one admits substitution either by way of a static differentiable production function, or with a vintage-type production function, the whole problem of full employment will vanish. At any level of savings (investment) there can be full employment given the correct factor proportions.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Their problem is partly due to the specifically Keynesian assumption that the increment in consumption is a fixed fraction of the increment in production. In fact, this fraction can be adjusted by incomes policy and fiscal and other transfer payments.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Figures from the 1967 ‘blue book’ (National Income and Expenditure) [9].

    Google Scholar 

  7. This whole section can be seen as a further elaboration of Sandee’s investment theory. Sandee [45], already mentioned in Section 5.3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calculation based on pages 24 and 32 of The National Plan. The order of magnitude of the figures is such that the precise employment figures do not matter much in fact.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1970 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heesterman, A.R.G. (1970). Capital-Output Ratios. In: Forecasting Models for National Economic Planning. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6214-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6214-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5793-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6214-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics