Skip to main content

The Nature of Scientific Statements, Laws

  • Chapter
Physical Science and Physical Reality
  • 115 Accesses

Abstract

We Want to consider more closely the logic of the statements which occur in an explanation and function as axioms. With respect to these we need to answer the following questions: (a) what is their form? (b) what do they mean?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. R. B. Braithwaite, Scientific Explanation, op. cit., Chapter IX.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Buchdahl, “Science and Logic: Some Thoughts on Newton’s Second Law of Motion,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 2, 1951–52, pp. 217 ff.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. M. Chisholm, “Law Statements and Counterfactual Inference,” Analysis, Vol. 15, 5, April, 1955, pp. 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Frank, Foundations of Physics, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 1, 7 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1946); especially Chapter II.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Goodman, “The Problem of Counterfactual Conditions,” Journal of Philosophy, XLIV (1947); reprinted in Leonard Linsky, editor, Semantics (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1952), pp. 231-248.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Hempel and P. Oppenheim, “Studies in the Logic of Explanation,” Part III Philosophy of Science, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Kneale, “Natural Laws and Conditionals,” Analysis, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Korner, “On Laws of Nature”, Mind, N.S. 62, 1953, pp. 216 ff.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Margenau, The Nature of Physical Reality (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1950)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Schlick, “Are Natural Laws Conventions?” in Feigl & Brodbeck, Readings in the Philosophy of Science (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953), pp. 181 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Sellars, “Concepts as Involving Laws and Inconceivable Without Them,” Philosophy of Science, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Toulmin, The Philosophy of Science, op. cit.; treats laws as rules of inference.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. J. Whitrow, “On the Foundations of Dynamics,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 1, 1950–51, pp. 92–107; a good study of the possible interpretations of the law of inertia.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. J. O. Wisdom, “The Descriptive Interpretation of Science,” Mind, 1943–44, pp. 91 ff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1957 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kattsoff, L.O. (1957). The Nature of Scientific Statements, Laws. In: Physical Science and Physical Reality. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6048-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6048-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5709-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6048-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics