Skip to main content
  • 113 Accesses

Abstract

There are almost as many ways to approach an investigation of the nature of science as there are investigators. Historically, two points of view have been taken, each of which has led to fruitful results. Science has been viewed either as a method of acquiring knowledge or as a systematic body of knowledge. All through history, however, the idea of a system has been a regulative one in the minds of scientists. Even if a specific method had to be used, the feeling was that one had no science until the information gathered could be expressed in systematic form. In fact a great deal of the controversy over the question of the scientific nature of sociology or psychology seemed to revolve around this. These two fields of knowledge were not systematic and hence did not have the formal appearance of sciences. The best example of a system is to be found in geometry and for this reason the deductive form came to be the ideal of all scientists, a form each ardently desired for the particular branch of science in which his interest lay. The work of people like David Hilbert and the Formalist school of logic soon revealed the fact that the structure of geometry was not peculiar in any way to geometry but one which could be generalized and applied to many fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. G. Bergmann, Metaphysics of Logical Positivism (New York: Longmans, Green & Company, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ludwig van Bertalanffy, “An Outline of General System Theory,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 1, 1950–51, pp. 134–173.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. R. B. Braithwaite, Scientific Explanation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953), chapter 2.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapter 2 contains a very good but technical discussion of the nature of a system.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. P. Campbell, Physics, The Elements (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1920), pp. 120–140.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A good concrete discussion of the structure of physical theories.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Carnap, “Foundations of Logic and Mathematics,” International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 1, No. 3 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1939).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A good but relatively technical introduction to the logical analysis of languages and especially formal systems.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ernst Cassirer, “The Influence of Language Upon the Development of Scientific Thought,” Journal of Philosophy, XXXIX, 1942, p. 309 ff.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Reichenbach, The Rise of Scientific Philosophy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1951), pp. 255 ff. Gives a rapid and brief sketch of languages and their relation to the activity of the scientist as a functional thing.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. —, Experience and Prediction (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938), chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A good discussion of language but oriented towards the verifiability theory of meaning.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. H. Woodger, “Science Without Properties,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 1, 1950–51, pp. 193–217. Uses method of formal structure of science to attempt to construct a language for scientific purposes without terms for properties.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. —, “From Biology to Mathematics,” Ibid., Vol. III, 1952–53, pp. 1–21. A continuation of “Science Without Properties” and valuable in showing how one goes about constructing a language.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. —, “The Technique of Theory Construction,” International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 2, No. 5, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A discussion of the way to go about constructing a theory using biology as its field.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1957 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kattsoff, L.O. (1957). Science as a Language. In: Physical Science and Physical Reality. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6048-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6048-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5709-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6048-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics