Abstract
Not only must a lawyer think efficiently, he must also know how to persuade other people that his statements are true, that his suggestions indicate a suitable solution of the problem and that his opinions are correct in the light of evaluations which are habitually held in this particular community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cf. Ch. Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, Traité de l’Argumentation, Paris 1958, — a work giving the foundation of the modern theory of argumentation.
Cf. also W. Marciszewski, Podstawy logicznej teorii przekonań [Foundations of a Logical Theory of Beliefs], Warszawa 1972, pp. 9–25.
Cf. Ch. Perelman, ‘L’argument pragmatique’, Logique et Analyse I (1958) 14–23.
Cf. Ch. L. Stevenson, ‘Persuasive Definitions’, Mind 187 (1938) 331.
In this section remarks from W. Witwicki’s paper have been utilized. Cf. W. Wi-twicki, Co to jest dyskusja i jak ją trzeba prowadzić, Warszawa 1949, p. 16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ziembiński, Z. (1976). The Art of Argumentation. In: Practical Logic. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5604-4_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5604-4_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5589-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-5604-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive