Skip to main content

Photosynthesis and Assimilate Partition in Fruiting and Non-Fruiting Grapevine Shoots

  • Chapter
Advances in Photosynthesis Research

Part of the book series: Advances in Agricultural Biotechnology ((AABI,volume 4))

Abstract

The identification in a plant of limiting conditions due to the source or the sink is a vital step in any study of crop productivity. In fact dry matter accumulation in a fruit can be limited either by the supply of assimilates or by the storage capacity of the fruit. Unfavourable environmental conditions or strong competing sinks can be responsible for a poor carbon flow to the economically useful organ. Manipulation of the sink (e.g., through its complete or partial removal) is a technique used in order to alter the demand for assimilates. It is, therefore, possible to check whether photosynthesis is under the control of the sink activity. The relationship between the rate of assimilate consumption by the sink and photosynthetic activity has been the subject of great controversy (3; 11; 14). There is ample evidence (3; 14) that photosynthetic carbon fixation responds, at least in some physiological stages, to an increa sed sink strength. Not so evident, however, is the often suggested product-inhibition hypothesis (4; 11), i.e. that accumulation of assimilates in an illuminated leaf may be responsible for a decrease in net photosynthesis. Some recent data (10; 12) did not support this hypothesis. However, it seems plausible (3) that some fraction of the photoassimilate, namely starch, can have inhibition effects on photosynthesis. In shading ex periments with soybeans (14) starch decreased markedly while sucrose and photosynthesis increased in those leaves that exported carbon most intensely. Glucose and fructose concentrations remained constant. This supports Ho (5) and Geiger (3) hypothesis that sucrose concentration in the source leaf mesophyll controls export. It was also stated (6) that leaves with a higher carbon status export at a higher rate for a given net photosynthetic rate. Some of those conflicting observations may be related to the species studied (7). Fruit load reduced the starch content and the soluble carbohydrates in the leaves of the eggplant, while in the strawberry plant the leaf content of soluble sugars was equally higher whether fruits were present or absent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bravdo BA (1972) Physiol, Plant, 27, 209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernandez J (1978) Photosynthetica, 12, 145–149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Geiger DR (1979) Bot, Gaz., 140, 241–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Habeshar D (1973) Planta, 110, 213–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ho LC (1976) J, Ezp, Bot,, 27, 87–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho LC (1977) Ann, Apl, Biol,, 87, 191–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffman E and Lenz F (1974) Gartenbawissens,, 39, 539–547

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kriedeeann PE, Loveys BR and Dovnton WJS (1975) Aust, J, Plant Physiol,, 2, 553–567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Loveys BR and Kriederann PE (1914) Aust, J, Plant Physiol„ 1, 407–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Milford GFJ and Penman I (1975) Photosynthetica, 9, 78–83

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Neale: TF and Incoll LD (1968) Bot, Rev,, 34, 107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Starck Z et al (1979) Photosynthesis and Plant Development, ed.by Marcelle R, Dr, Junk, Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Surner JR (1925) J, Biol, Chem., 65, 393–395

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thorne JH and Koller HR (1974) Plant Physiol., 54, 201–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaves, M.M. (1984). Photosynthesis and Assimilate Partition in Fruiting and Non-Fruiting Grapevine Shoots. In: Sybesma, C. (eds) Advances in Photosynthesis Research. Advances in Agricultural Biotechnology, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4971-8_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4971-8_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-2945-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-4971-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics