Skip to main content

The Criminal, Law in Force in the Dutch Occupied Areas of Indonesia

  • Chapter
An Outline of the Recent History of Indonesian Criminal Law

Abstract

The sphere of validity of all legislative measures of the Republican government discussed above was limited to the areas in which that government exercised effective authority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A different opinion was adhered to by the Landrechter of Medan in his verdict of June 9, 1947, T. 1947 p. 217 ff. Although the facts had occurred in an area under the de facto control of the Republic, the regulation of S. 1945 No. 135 was applied by the judge who considered himself competent since the facts had occurred within his jurisdiction (Residency of Sumatra’s East Coast). But the competence of the judge to try those facts does not imply that the laws of the Netherlands Indies government were also binding for those facts, irrespective of the place of their commission. The validity of both the republican and the Netherlands Indies criminal law was dependent upon the locus delicti.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gf. M.D.B. 1951, ‘De gelding van vroeger recht in Indonesië’, p. 9, R. Sastranegara, Hukum Tatanegara Indonesia, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. François, op. cit. p. 766, see also Oppenheim-Lauterpacht, op. cit. p. 437.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Art. 2 of the Ordinance of S. 1945 No. 122 presupposes the possibility of Japanese criminal law regulations to be maintained valid.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. 1945 No. 123, entered into force on August 25, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. 1945 No. 135, in force as from October 7, 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. 1946 No. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See M.D.B., 1953 ‘Territoriale verscheidenheid’, p. 31, where it is argued that in the case concerned, capital punishment cannot be inflicted any more, because the defendant has already been punished with the maximum penalty. This way of reasoning is not satisfying, because the infliction of a maximum penalty does not prevent the infliction of another more severe penalty. Cf. the considerations of the Raad van Justitie, Batavia December 15, 1938, T. Vol. 149 p. 64 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  9. In his annotation in T. Vol. 149 p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cf. Smit, op. cit. p. 136 note 1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For the map of Java and Madura under the Renville-agreement, see Kahin, Nationalism and Revolution, p. 233, and of Indonesia as a whole, see Lukisan Revolusi 1945–1950 dari Negara Kesatuan ke Negara Kesatuan, published by the Ministry of Information, 2nd ed. 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Verordening van de Legercommandant No. 514 J.D. 1/1/18, July 19, 1947, Javasche Courant 1947 No. 64, see appendix of H. K. J. Cowan, ‘Indische rechtsbedeling na de bevrijding’, Indonesië 1948–1949 p. 89 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Javasche Courant 1947 p. 320, Cowan, op. cit. p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. M.D.B., 1951, ‘De gelding van vroeger recht’, p. 9 note 2.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Javasche Courant 1947 p. 321, Cowan, op. cit. p. 91–92.

    Google Scholar 

  16. In its verdict of May 2, 1949 T. 1950 p. 14 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taken from a map in Tussen Sawahs en Bergen, Het Leven van de Soldaat in de Tijgerbrigade, p. 31. On that map a part of Madura is also shaded as republican territory, which indeed was in accordance with the situation on August 5, 1947 when the first military action was ended. But later on the Dutch troops crossed their own Van Mook-line and occupied the remaining half of the island, cf. Kahin, op. cit. p. 220.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Decree No. 5 of October 23, 1947 S. 1947 No. 180, in force as from the day following publication, which occurred on October 31, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Decree No. 6 of July 26, 1948 S. 1948 No. 169 in force as from July 30, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cf. M.D.B. 1953 ‘Territoriale verscheidenheid’, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cf. Lemaire, Het Wetboek van Strafrecht, p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cf. Oemar Seno Adji, ‘Kemerdekaan Pers di Indonesia’, Part II, Hukum 1956 No. 1–2 p. 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. 1948 No. 224 in force as from September 22, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Decree No. 3 of the High Representative of the Grown of January 3, 1949 S. 1949 No. 1 entered into force on January 7, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Decree No. 3 of September 22, 1949 S. 1949 No. 258 entered into force on September 28, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cf. Kahin, op. cit. p. 338.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Verordening van de Legercommandant No. 539 of December 15, 1948 Javasche Courant 1948 No. 105, completed by Verordening No. 559 of August 18, 1949, Javasche Courant 1949 No. 71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1961 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siong, H.B. (1961). The Criminal, Law in Force in the Dutch Occupied Areas of Indonesia. In: An Outline of the Recent History of Indonesian Criminal Law. Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4967-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4967-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-4668-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-4967-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics