Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Scholars Forum ((ISFO))

  • 34 Accesses

Abstract

Estrades, the soldier-diplomat, returned to France to resume the simpler duties of mere soldiering, as governor of the fortress of Dunkirk.1 Already selected to replace him was the administrator-diplomat, Arnauld de Pomponne. Pomponne’s letter of recall reached him at Stockholm in mid-July. He boarded ship for Hamburg in August, but it was late September before a tedious journey brought him to Saint-Germain.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pomponne, Relation de Hollande, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ludwig Bittner and Lothar Gross, eds., Repertorium der diplomatischen Vertreter aller Länder seit dem Westfälischen Frieden (Oldenburg and Berlin, 1936-), I, 234; Pomponne, Mémoires, I, 562, 566, 569; Pomponne, Relation de Hollande, p. 29; Arnauld, p. 330.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pomponne, Relation de Hollande, p. 29; Wicquefort to Lionne, Oct. 18, 1668, Arch, étr., Holl., vol. 88, fo. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Recueil... Hollande, I, 259.

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Groot to Wicquefort, Nov. 10, 1668, De Groot, p. 3; De Groot to De Witt, Nov. 29, 1668, De Witt, Brieven, II, 598–99. Wicquefort later contrasted Pomponne’s fundamental probity with Estrades’ deceitfulness. Wicquefort, L’ambassadeur et ses fonctions (Amsterdam, 1730), II, 202.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wicquefort to Lionne, Oct. 4, 18, 1668, Arch. étr., Holl., vol. 88, fos. 244, 257, 259. 3 Wicquefort to Lionne, Oct. 18, 1668, ibid., fo. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wicquefort to Lionne, Nov. 1, 1668, ibid., fo. 272.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pomponne, Relation de Hollande, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chapelain to Heinsius, Oct. 11, 1668, Chapelain, II, 599.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wicquefort to Lionne, Dec. 13, 1668, Arch, étr., Holl., vol. 88, fo. 309.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chapelain to Heinsius, Dec. 11, 1668, Chapelain, II, 607.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wicquefort to someone in Bonzv’s party, Jan. 7, 1669, Arch, étr., Holl., vol. 89, fos. 13–14. Mignet (III, 563) identifies the addressee as “M. de Bondy,” which sounds suspiciously like Bonzy. Mignet, here as elsewhere, omits significant portions of the letter. C. F. Haje identifies this letter as one to Lionne, and asserts, without indicating his evidence, that it was written at De Witt’s instructions (De geheime correspondentie van Abraham de Wicquefort met den Franschen Minister de Lionne [The Hague, 1901], p. 116).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wicquefort to Lionne, Jan. 10, 1669, Arch. étr., Holl., vol. 89, fos. 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wicquefort to Lionne, Jan. 24, 1669, ibid., fo. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Turenne’s holograph original is in Arch, étr., Holl. vol. 88, fos. 297ff. Pomponne’s copy, which varies somewhat, primarily in the direction of logical clarity, is in his own handwriting, in Bib. Ars., MS 4712, fos. 1–3. Another copy, apparently based on Pomponne’s version, is in Arch, étr., HolL, vol. 88, fos. 303ff. Two excerpts from Turenne’s copy were printed in Recueil... Hollande (I, 262, note 1) by André and Bourgeois. Pomponne’s version differs materially, though not fundamentally, from Turenne’s; it was quite possibly what the great soldier, never gifted with facile or precise command of the written word, actually said. In any event, it is more important to us as the form in which Pomponne received and preserved Turenne’s ideas.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Recueil... Hollande, I, 271. References to the instructions are made to this collection, which is generally available. The editors transcribed the copy in the archives of the French foreign ministry (Arch, étr., Holl., vol. 89, fos. 28–42). Noting that there were difficulties in determining the order of materials toward the end of the document, they depended upon pencilled notations for the order of the final six paragraphs. The sequence thus established (Recueil..., Hollande, I, 286–90) does not correspond, however, to the actual order in the final form of the instructions, preserved, as André and Bourgois note, among Pomponne’s papers in the Bibliothèque de l’Arsenal (MS 4712, fos. 8ff). Some forty differences exist between the transcription in the Recueil... Hollande and the manuscript in the Arsenal. Most of these are inconsequential; none invalidates the general accuracy of the printed text.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Relation de Hollande, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Recueil... Hollande, I, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  19. The word “très” is omitted in the Recueil... Hollande (I, 271), which makes a vigorous phrase a weak one. 5 Ibid., pp. 271–73.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bib. Ars., MS 4712, fo. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pomponne, in summarizing the instructions in his Relation, took out this note of warning, by saying that these were thoughts the king “does not have and has never had.” (Relation de Hollande, p. 72.)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Recueil... Hollande, I, 273–78. Cf. Wicquefort, Histoire, IV, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bib. Ars., MS 4712, fo. 1. 3 Ibid., fo. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pomponne, Relation de Hollande, pp. 70–72.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Recueil... Hollande, I, 278–79. 2 Ibid., pp. 286–87.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bib. Ars., MS 4712, fos. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pomponne, Relation de Hollande, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  28. The exact position of the fortifications is no longer known. M. A. Bonvarlet, “Notes sur la commune de Capelle-Brouck,” Annales du comité flamand de France, XV (1883–86), 178–83.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Recueil... Hollande, I, 275–76. Cf. Wicquefort, Histoire, III, 438–39.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bib. Ars., MS 4712, fo. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cf. De Witt to Temple, June 4, 1668, De Witt, Correspondance française, p. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Recueil... Hollande, I, 276–77. 5 Bib. Ars., MS 4712. fo. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Recueil...Hollande, I, 287–88. Cf. Pomponne, Relation de Hollande, pp. 75–76.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Recueil... Hollande, I, pp. 288–89. 3 Bib. Ars., MS 4712, fos. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pomponne at Lille to Lionne, Feb. 16, 1669, Arch. étr., Holl., vol. 89, fo. 52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1957 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowen, H.H. (1957). Purposes and Plans. In: The Ambassador Prepares for War. International Scholars Forum. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4778-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4778-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-4587-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-4778-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics