Abstract
The single tendency most apparent throughout the early years of the civil wars is the general inclination toward neutrality, and there can be little doubt that the vast majority of Englishmen would have been content to remain impartial in the quarrel between king and parliament. Among the gentry there was dismay at the prospect of being forced to take sides, and strenuous efforts were made to avoid being embroiled in a struggle hazardous to both life and property. Nonintervention likewise commended itself to men who were never satisfied in their consciences as to the justice of either faction, and who were torn between allegiance to the king and resistance to personal government. Their dilemma is clearly expressed in a letter of a Birmingham gentleman.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Military Memoir of Colonel John Birch, ed. J. and T. W. Webb, Camden Soc., N.S., VII (London, 1873), pp. 217–18.
The Deposition Books of Bristol, 1643–1647, ed. H. E. Nott, Bristol Record Soc., VI (Bristol, 1935), p. 12.
H.M.C., 5th Report (1876), p. 145; The Oxinden and Peyton Letters, 1642–1670, ed. Dorothy Gardiner (London, 1937), pp. 31, 41.
Thomas Roe to the Elector Palatine, 18 Oct. 1642, as quoted in S. R. Gardiner, History of the Great Civil War, 1642–1649, 2nd ed. (London 1893), I, 38–39.
Neutrality is Malignancy (n.p., 1648), p. 8.
Rushworth, VI, 639.
C.S.P., Ven., XXVI, 34; L.J., V, 83, 101.
Rebellion, v. 137.
Ibid., v. 339–40.
James Heath, A New Book of Loyal English Martyrs and Confessors (London, n.d.), p. 308.
C. H. Firth, Essays, Historical and Literary (Oxford, 1938), pp. 108–9.
George Roberts, The Social History of the People of the Southern Counties of England (London, 1856), p. 207.
H.M.C., Portland MSS. (1891–1931), III, 86. Cf. the sermon preached by Dr. Edward Symmons to the royal army: “A complete cavalier is a child of honour. He is the only reserve of English gentility and ancient valour, and hath rather chosen to bury himself in the tomb of honour than to see the nobility of his nation vassalaged.” (Eliot Warburton, Memoirs of Prince Rupert [London, 1849], I, 414).
Bruno Ryves, Mercurius Rusticus (Oxford, 1646), p. 96.
Gardiner, Great Civil War, I, 18.
Rebellion, vi. 36.
C.S.P., Ven., XXVI, 135–36.
Nicholas Papers, I, 62–63.
Oxinden and Peyton Letters, ed. Gardiner, p. 16.
Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle, The Life of William Cavendish, Duke of Newcastle, ed. C. H. Firth, 2nd ed. (London, 1907), p. 94.
Old Parl. Hist., XI, 87–88.
Clarendon, Rebellion, v. 346.
Ibid., vi. 67–68.
C.S.P., Dom.,1645–47, pp. 441–42.
The Journals of Sir Thomas•Allin, 1660–1678, ed. R. C. Anderson, Navy Records Soc., LXXIX—LXXX (London, 1939–40), I, xi.
R. H. Tawney, Religion and the Rise of Capitalism (London, 1926), pp. 202–4; Margaret James,Social Problems and Policy during the Puritan Revolution, 1640–1660 (London, 1930), p. 8.
British Museum, Add. MS. 34,012.
Rebellion, vi. 269. Cf. Hobbes: “For there were very few of the common people that cared much for either of the causes, but would have taken any side for pay and plunder”. (Behemoth, in The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, ed. Sir William Molesworth [London, 1839–45], VI, 166).
Agamemnon Shaglock van Dammee (pseud.), The Speech of a Cavaleere to his Comrades (London, 1642).
G. B. Tatham,The Puritans in Power (Cambridge, 1913), pp. 52–53.
Rebellion, iii. 65.
Table Talk of John Selden, ed. Sir Frederick Pollock (London, 1927), pp. 99–100.
[… Chestlin?], Persecutio Undecima. The Churches Eleventh Persecution (n.p., 1648), p. 20.
The estimate of Gregorio Panzani, the papal nuncio, made in 1637 (Charles Butler, Historical Memoirs Respecting the English, Irish, and Scottish Catholics [London, 1819–21], IV, 55–56). For a full examination of the question see Brian Magee, The English Recusants (London, 1938).
C.S.P., Ven.,XXV, 75, 93, 294; H.M.C., Egmont MSS., (1905–9), I, 163.
The opinion that popery was favored by the court, wrote Secretary Nicholas, was prejudicing the royal cause more than any other thing (to Charles, 19 Sept. 1641, in Diary of John Evelyn, ed. W. Bray and H. B. Wheatley [London, 1879], IV, 88–89).
H.M.C., 7th Report (1879), p. 549; Gardiner, Great Civil War, I, 12; H.M.C., 6th Report (1877), p. 191.
C.S.P., Dom., 1641–43, p. 373; cf. H.M.C., Portland MSS.,I, 64.
C.S.P., Ven., XXVI, 30.
Clarendon, Rebellion, v. 441, n. 1, sec. 3.
Warburton, Memoirs of Prince Rupert, I, 317.
Clarendon, Rebellion,vi. 65.
Letters and Memorials of State… Written and Collected by [the Sydney Family], ed. Arthur Collins (London, 1746), II, 667.
“Papers Relating to the Delinquency of Lord Savile,” ed. James J. Cartwright, Camden Miscellany, VIII (London, 1883), pp. 5–6.
Richard Parr, The Life of the Most Reverend Father in God, James Usher (London, 1686), p. 56; Rushworth, V, 78–83; H.M.C., 7th Report, p. 530.
Of the marquises and earls in 1642 whose titles dated from before 1603, Hertford, Winchester, Bath, Cumberland, Huntingdon, Shrewsbury, Southampton, and Worcester may be accounted royalists; while Bedford, Essex, Lincoln, Northumberland, Nottingham, Pembroke, and Rutland supported parliament. Arundel was abroad; Derby, Kent, and Sussex were in their eighties; and Oxford was a minor. The same tendency is shown among the viscounts and barons.
H.M.C., 4th Report (1874), pp. 259–60.
Gladys Scott Thomson, Life in a Noble Household (London, 1937), pp. 70–71.
C.S.P., Dom., 1644, p. 110.
Warburton, Memoirs of Prince Rupert, III, 515–31; Henry Dircks, The Life, Times, and Scientific Labours of the Second Marquis of Worcester (London, 1865), p. 54.
Rebellion, vi. 59–60, vii. 395.
For examples of wartime loans which were provided for by Charles II see the introduction to Calendar of Treasury Books, 1660–1667, ed. W. A. Shaw (London, 1904), pp. xvii—xx. Cf. the accounts of John Ashburnham, treasurer at war (A Narrative by John Ashburnham [London, 1830], II, App. i).
The Sence of the Oxford Junto Concerning the Late Treaty (n,p., 1645).
C. H. Firth, The House of Lords during the Civil War (London, 1910), pp. 25–26; Dircks, Worcester,p. 45.
H.M.C., Buccleuch MSS. at Montagu House (1899), I, 310.
Lucy Hutchinson, Memoirs of the Life of Colonel Hutchinson, ed. C. H. Firth, 2nd ed. (London, 1906), p. 409; H.M.C., 7th Report, p. 224.
Historical Discourses (London, 1705), pp. 304–5.
“Sir Edward Lake’s account of his Interviews with Charles I,” ed. T. P. Langmead, Camden Miscellany, IV (London, 1859).
Frederick J. Varley, The Siege of Oxford (Oxford, 1932), p. 24.
Original Letters, Illustrative of English History, ed. Henry Ellis, 2nd ser. (London, 1827), III, 311.
Rebellion, v. 430.
A Remonstrance of the Present State of Yorkshire (London, 1644).
Diary of Henry Townshend of Elmly Lovett, ed. J. W. Willis Bund, Worcestershire Hist. Soc. (London, 1915–20), II, 139.
Rushworth, VI, 364.
Steele, I, 2539, 2541; H.M.C., 6th Report’ p. 218; Docquets of Letters Patent and Other Instruments Passed under the Great Seal of King Charles I. at Oxford, ed. William H. Black (printed but not pub., London, 1838), index, “Commissions, Compounding for Estates,” and “Commissions, Inquiry concerning Rebels’ and Delinquents’ Estates and Property.”
Original Papers Illustrative of the Life and Writings of John Milton, ed. W. D. Hamilton, Camden Soc., O.S., LXXV (London, 1859), p. 128.
Rebellion, viii. 140; ix. 22, 24, 61–65. 140.
H.M.C., Rutland MSS. (1888–1905), II, 6–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1956 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hardacre, P.H. (1956). The Royalist Party, 1642–1643. In: The Royalists during the Puritan Revolution. International Scholars Forum, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4726-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4726-4_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-4563-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-4726-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive