Skip to main content

Abstract

If young roe deer get enough food in their first 8 months of life, they grow rapidly. Life weights range from below 10 kg to above 23 kg for roe deer kids in November. Under field conditions at Stammham (Bavaria) young roe deer grow as fast as farm animals until August, but slowlier from the time of September. There is nearly no growth from December until the end of May under range conditions, but about 4 kg of penned animals artificially fed, and even more of the young of penned females. — Retarded young animals do not catch up, even when kept in good feeding conditions.

So, mean body size of a population of roe deer is triggered by feeding conditions in the range, mainly from autumn to early spring. — A population of large body size is only possible, if the animals have had enough food of good quality. So they could not have damaged the vegetation. Body size of roe deer may be regarded as an indicator for a population (density), that makes not too much damage on young forest plantations.

A bone length is a better controle of body size than weights are, which differ in the same animal according to the season of the year. Adult roe bucks in W-Germany weigh (mean values in parenthesis) from 12 to 25 kg (about 15 kg) without viscera and organs of the body cavity (“Kg”), depending upon range conditions and density. Maximal length of the skull ranges from 180 to 220 mm (187 mm); skull bones of the trophy from 133 to 170 (145 mm); jaw bone from 141 to 172 mm (150 mm). These measures are highly correlated to each other and to body weight.

If skull length (mm) in relation to body weight \( \sqrt[3]{{KG}} \) is regarded with allometric methods, the allometric exponent for one population (103 adult bucks, a = 0,651) is nearly equal to that of five different populations (n = 116, a = 0,673). That’s why skull length (or jaw bone length) is believed to be an indicator for the body sizes of roe deer populations in a very large area.

Range-related, the relative roe deer density in W-Germany must become smaller in many localities. It should be somewhere below carning capacity — for the benefit of the forests and of the deer. — It is believed to be possible to reach mean body sizes of adult (over 24 months old) roe bucks of 200 mm skull length (18–19 kg “Kg”) nearly everywhere in Germany by reducing population densities and/or making range conditions more favorable.

Regarding the body size of a roe deer population, management may become independent of the “knowledge” of population density. — Maybe hunters become interested in this project, for trophy quality grows with body size overproportionally.

Die grundlegenden Gedanken zu diesem Vortrag wurden gemeinsam mit Dr. D. Eisfeld, Inst.f.Tierphysiol., München, entwickelt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • BENINDE, J. (1937): Naturgeschichte des Rothirsches. — Monographie Wildsäugetiere, IV. Leipzig: P. Schöps.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOHLKEN, H. (1962): Probleme der Merkmalsbewertung am Säugetierschädel, dargestelt am Beispiel des Bos primigenius Bojanus 1827. — Gegenbaurs Morph. Jahrb. 103: 509–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHEATUM, E.L. & C.W. SERVINGHAUS, (1950): Variations in fertility of white-tailed deer related to range conditions. — Trans.N.Amer.Wildlife Conf. 15: 170–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • EISFELD, D. & H. ELLENBERG, (1974); Geht es auch ohne Abschußplan? Vorschlag einer neuen Abschußregelung für Rehwild. — Die Pirsch — Der Deutsche Jäger, 26 (18): 858–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • ELLENBERG, H. (1974): Beiträge zur Ökologie des Rehes (Capreolus capreolus L. 1758). Daten aus den Stammhamer Versuchsgehegen. — Dissertation, Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ELLENBERG, H. (1975): Wilddichte, Ernährung und Vermehrung beim Reh. Verhandl. Gesellschaft für Ökologie, Erlangen.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEIST, V. (1971): Mountain Sheep. A study in Behaviour and Evolution. — Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago/London, 383 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAAFTEN VAN, J.L. (1968): Das Rehwild in verschiedenen Standorten der Niederlande und Sloweniens. — Itbon-Mittlg. 76, Arnhem.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEIN, J. (1966): Untersuchungen über Wege zur Verbesserung der Qualität eines Rehwildbestandes. — Dissertation, Göttingen/Hann.Münden.

    Google Scholar 

  • HERRE, W. & M. RÖHRS, (1973): Haustiere — zoologisch gesehen. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUXLEY, J.S. (1932): Problems of relative growth. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLATT, B. (1913): Über den Einfluß der Gesamtgroße auf das Schädelbild nebst Bemerkungen über die Vorgeschichte der Haustiere. Arch. Entw. mech. 36: 387–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • KELSALL, J.P. (1968): The Caribou. Ottawa: The Queen’s printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLEIN, D.R. (1964): Range-related differences in growth of deer reflected in skeletal ratios. — J. Mammalog. 45: 226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KLEIN, D.R. (1965): Ecology of deer range in Alaska. — Ecol. Monog. 35: 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KLEIN, D.R. & H. STRANDGAARD, (1972): Factors affecting growth and body size of roe deer. — J. Wildl. Manage. 36: 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEHMANN VON (1957): Über die Heterogenität des europäischen Rehes. — Z. Jagdwiss. 3: 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEUNIER, K. (1963): Die Knickungsverhältnisse des Cervidenschädels. Mit Bemerkungen zur Systematik. — Zool. Anz. 172: 184–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEUNIER, K. (1965): Der gesetmäßige Polymorphismus funktionell indifferenter Organe bei den Lucaniden (Coleopt. Lamellicorn.). — Zool. Anz. 175: 50–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOTTL, S. (1958): Die Nahrung des Rehwildes. — Z. Jagdwiss. 4, 228 (Referat).

    Google Scholar 

  • MOTTL, S. (1962): Zur Frage der Wilddichte und der Qualität des Rehwildes. Beiträge Jagdu. Wildforschung 11: 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • MÜLLER, H.J. (1967): Untersuchungen zur Beurteilung der wirtschaftlich tragbaren Schalenwilddichte im Walde nach Wildschäden am Standort. — Arch. Forstwes. Berlin 14: 533–61 (Referat Z.Jagdwiss. 13, 86).

    Google Scholar 

  • NIEVERGELT, B. (1966): Der Alpensteinbock. — Mammalia depicta Parey, Hamburg/Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • PIETSCH, M. (1970): Vergleichende Untersuchungen an Schädeln nord-amerikanischer und europäischer Bisamratten. — Z. Säugetierkde. 35: 257–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • REMPE, U. (1970): Morphometrische Untersuchungen an Iltisschädeln zur Klärung der Verwandschaft von Steppeniltis, Waldiltis und Frettchen. — Z. wiss. Zool. 180: 185–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • RODENWALDT, U. (1970): Waldbau und Jagd. — Schweiz. Z. Forstwes. 121: 657–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • RÖHRS, M. (1959): Neue Ergebnisse und Probleme der Allometrieforschung. — Z. wiss. Zool 161: 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • SZEDERJEI, A. & M. SZEDERJEI, (1972): Das Geheimnis des Weltrekords. Das Reh. — Terra, Budapest. 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellenberg, H. (1975). Die Körpergrösse des Rehes als Bioindikator. In: Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie Erlangen 1974. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4521-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4521-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-6193-180-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-4521-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics