Skip to main content

Abstract

The law of war consists of three largely separate bodies of law corresponding to the three environments in which war is conducted—land, air and sea. The law with respect to war on land is relatively modern, highly detailed and almost universally accepted. The law of war in the air and the law of naval warfare are fragmentary, pitched on a high level of abstraction and rendered obsolescent by changes in technology and in the power of States. While the International Law Association has from time to time concerned itself with these subjects, the sole activity of the Association in this field since the Second World War has been in the field of International Medical Law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Done at Geneva, Aug. 12, 1949, U.N.T.S., vol. 75, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Signed at Geneva, Oct. 18, 1907, Martens, Nouveau Recueil Général, 3d ser., vol. 3, p. 461.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, Opinion and Judgment (1947), p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Signed June 17, 1925, L.N.T.S., vol. 94, p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Res. 2674 (XXV), Dec. 9, 1970, Gen Ass. Off. Rec., 25th Sess., Supp. No. 28 (Doc. A/8o28) (1971), p. 75 at 76.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Done at The Hague on May 14, 1954, U.N.T.S., vol. 249, p. 240.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Signed at Geneva, Aug. 22, 1864, Martens, Nouveau Recueil Général, vol. 18, p. 607.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L.N.T.S., vol. 11, p. 440.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L.N.T.S., vol. 118, p. 303.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L.N.T.S., vol. 118, p. 343.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Geneva Civilians Convention of 1949 was the first multilateral treaty to set up rules on the internment of civilians in belligerently occupied territory and in the territory of a belligerent. Theretofore it had been suggested that civilian internees should at least benefit from the same safeguards as those extended to prisoners of war.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E.g., Security Council Res. No. 267, July 3, Ă­g69, U.N. Security Council Off. Rec., 24th year, Res. (Doc. S/INF/24/Rev. i) (1970), p. 3; Security Council Res. No. 271, Sep. 15, 5969, id., p. 5; General Assembly Resolution 2727 (XXV), Gen. Ass. Off. Rec., 25th Sess., Supp. No. 28, (Doc. A/8o28) (1971), p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Regulations for the United Nations Emergency Force, Feb. 20, 1957, U.N.T.S., vol. 271, p. 169; Regulations for the United Nations Force in the Congo, July, 1963, U.N. Doc. ST/SGB/ONUC/1 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Art. 8/8/8/9 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  15. As in the case of relations between the Arab States and Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Art. 1o/ TOO T. 3d para., common to the four Geneva Conventions of 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The activities of the I.C.R.C. in this respect are described in its Annual Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Art. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Art. 23, paras. a and e.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dec. 11, 1868, British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 58, p. 16; American Journal of International Law, vol. 1, Supp. (1907), p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Signed June i7, 1925, L.N.T.S., vol. 94, p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  22. United States Department of State Bulletin, vol. 63 (197o), p. 273.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Geneva Prisoners of War Convention, art. 4, para. A(2).

    Google Scholar 

  24. As laid down in art. 4, para. A(2) (a)-(d), deriving from art. i of the Hague Regulations.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See G. M. Abi-Saab, “Wars of National Liberation and the Laws of War,” in [1972] Annales d’Etudes Internationales 93.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Agreement concerning a Military Armistice in Korea, signed at Panmunjom, July 27, 1953, art. III, para. 51, United States Treaties and Other International Agreements, vol. 4, p. 234; Protocol to the Agreement on Ending the War and Restoring Peace in Vietnam concerning the Return of Captured Military Personnel and Foreign Civilians and Captured and Detained Vietnamese Civilian Personnel, signed at Paris, Jan. 23, 1973 art. 6, United States Department of State Bulletin, vol. 68 (1973). p. 174.

    Google Scholar 

  27. The requirement of Article 102 of the Geneva Prisoners of War Convention of 1949 that “A prisoner of war can be validly sentenced only if the sentence has been pronounced by the same courts according to the same procedure as in the case of members of the armed forces of the Detaining Power,chrw(133) ” means that a prisoner cannot be turned over to an international tribunal for trial unless the Detaining Power does the same with respect to its own soldiers. That seems unlikely.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Art. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Signed Oct. 18, 1907, arts. i, 5, and 6, Martens, Nouveau Recueil Général, 3d ser., vol. 3, p. 604.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Art. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Geneva Wounded and Sick Convention. art. 19; Geneva Civilians Convention, art. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dec. ii, 1922, General Report of the Commission of Jurists at The Hague, American Journal of International Law, vol. 17 Supp. (1923), P. 245.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Arts. 22 and 24, para. i.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, 1971, vol. 3(1971), P. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  35. I.C.R.C., Annual Report, 1957, pp. 83-84.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, vol. 53 (II) (1969), p. 358.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See, e.g. Schwarzenberger, The Legality of Nuclear Weapons (1958). pp. 26–49.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Art. 23, para. a.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Martens, Nouveau Recueil Général, 3d ser., vol. 3, p. 533.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Id. at p. 557.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Id. at p. 580.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Id. at p. 604.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Id. at p. 663.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Id. at p. 713.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Signed April 16, 1856, Martens, Nouveau Recueil Général, vol. 15, p. 791

    Google Scholar 

  46. Signed Feb. 26, 1909, British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 104, p. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Signed April 22, 193o, art. 22, L.N.T.S., vol. 112, p. 65 at p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Procès-Verbal concerning Rules of Submarine Warfare, signed at London,Nov. 6, 1936, L.N.T.S., vol. 173, p. 253.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tucker, The Law of War and Neutrality at Sea, United States Naval War College, International Law Studies, vol. 5o (1957), pp. 3o-32, 254-258, 305-307, 312–315.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, Opinion and Judgment (1947), p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  51. The impact of new technology on naval operations and, as a result, on the law of naval warfare is illuminatingly analyzed by D. P. O’Connell, in “International Law and Contemporary Naval Operations”, in British Year Book of International Law., vol. 44 (1970), p. 19, and “The Legality of Naval Cruise Missiles”, in American Journal of International Law, vol. 66 (1972), p. 785.

    Google Scholar 

  52. See Medlicott, The Economic Blockade, vol. 1 (1952) and vol. 2 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Resolution XXVIII, Protection of Civilian Populations against the Dangers of Indiscriminate Warfare, XXth International Conference of the Red Cross, Resolutions (1965), p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Resolution XXIII, Human Rights in Armed Conflicts, May 12, 1968, Final Act of the International Conference on Human Rights, Teheran, 22 April to 13 May 1968 (U.N. Doc. A/CONF. 32/1o) (1968), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Dec. 19, 1968, Gen. Ass. Off. Rec., 23d Sess., Supp. No 18 (A17218) (1969),p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Respect for Human Rights in Armed Conflict; Reports of the Secretary-General, U.N. Docs. A/772o (1969) and A/8o52 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  57. I.C.R.C., Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva, 24 May-12 June 1971, 8 volumes variously titled (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  58. See I.C.R.C., Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts (Geneva, 24 May-12 June 1971), Report on the Work of the Conference (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  59. I.C.R.C., Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Devel- opment of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts

    Google Scholar 

  60. See Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Second Session, 3 May-3 June 1972, Report on the Work of the Conference, 2 vols. (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Resolutfon 3032 (XXVII), Jan. 23, 1973, Doc. A/RES/3o32 (XXVII) (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Napalm and other incendiary weapons and all aspects of their possibe use; Report of the Secretary-General, U.N. Doc. A/88o3 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cited supra n. 61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1973 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baxter, R.R. (1973). The Law of War. In: Bos, M. (eds) The Present State of International Law and Other Essays. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4497-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4497-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-4499-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-4497-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics