Abstract
The law of war consists of three largely separate bodies of law corresponding to the three environments in which war is conducted—land, air and sea. The law with respect to war on land is relatively modern, highly detailed and almost universally accepted. The law of war in the air and the law of naval warfare are fragmentary, pitched on a high level of abstraction and rendered obsolescent by changes in technology and in the power of States. While the International Law Association has from time to time concerned itself with these subjects, the sole activity of the Association in this field since the Second World War has been in the field of International Medical Law.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Done at Geneva, Aug. 12, 1949, U.N.T.S., vol. 75, p. 31.
Signed at Geneva, Oct. 18, 1907, Martens, Nouveau Recueil Général, 3d ser., vol. 3, p. 461.
Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, Opinion and Judgment (1947), p. 83.
Signed June 17, 1925, L.N.T.S., vol. 94, p. 65.
Res. 2674 (XXV), Dec. 9, 1970, Gen Ass. Off. Rec., 25th Sess., Supp. No. 28 (Doc. A/8o28) (1971), p. 75 at 76.
Done at The Hague on May 14, 1954, U.N.T.S., vol. 249, p. 240.
Signed at Geneva, Aug. 22, 1864, Martens, Nouveau Recueil Général, vol. 18, p. 607.
L.N.T.S., vol. 11, p. 440.
L.N.T.S., vol. 118, p. 303.
L.N.T.S., vol. 118, p. 343.
The Geneva Civilians Convention of 1949 was the first multilateral treaty to set up rules on the internment of civilians in belligerently occupied territory and in the territory of a belligerent. Theretofore it had been suggested that civilian internees should at least benefit from the same safeguards as those extended to prisoners of war.
E.g., Security Council Res. No. 267, July 3, Ăg69, U.N. Security Council Off. Rec., 24th year, Res. (Doc. S/INF/24/Rev. i) (1970), p. 3; Security Council Res. No. 271, Sep. 15, 5969, id., p. 5; General Assembly Resolution 2727 (XXV), Gen. Ass. Off. Rec., 25th Sess., Supp. No. 28, (Doc. A/8o28) (1971), p. 36.
Regulations for the United Nations Emergency Force, Feb. 20, 1957, U.N.T.S., vol. 271, p. 169; Regulations for the United Nations Force in the Congo, July, 1963, U.N. Doc. ST/SGB/ONUC/1 (1963).
Art. 8/8/8/9 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 1949.
As in the case of relations between the Arab States and Israel.
Art. 1o/ TOO T. 3d para., common to the four Geneva Conventions of 1949.
The activities of the I.C.R.C. in this respect are described in its Annual Reports.
Art. 22.
Art. 23, paras. a and e.
Dec. 11, 1868, British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 58, p. 16; American Journal of International Law, vol. 1, Supp. (1907), p. 95.
Signed June i7, 1925, L.N.T.S., vol. 94, p. 65.
United States Department of State Bulletin, vol. 63 (197o), p. 273.
Geneva Prisoners of War Convention, art. 4, para. A(2).
As laid down in art. 4, para. A(2) (a)-(d), deriving from art. i of the Hague Regulations.
See G. M. Abi-Saab, “Wars of National Liberation and the Laws of War,” in [1972] Annales d’Etudes Internationales 93.
Agreement concerning a Military Armistice in Korea, signed at Panmunjom, July 27, 1953, art. III, para. 51, United States Treaties and Other International Agreements, vol. 4, p. 234; Protocol to the Agreement on Ending the War and Restoring Peace in Vietnam concerning the Return of Captured Military Personnel and Foreign Civilians and Captured and Detained Vietnamese Civilian Personnel, signed at Paris, Jan. 23, 1973 art. 6, United States Department of State Bulletin, vol. 68 (1973). p. 174.
The requirement of Article 102 of the Geneva Prisoners of War Convention of 1949 that “A prisoner of war can be validly sentenced only if the sentence has been pronounced by the same courts according to the same procedure as in the case of members of the armed forces of the Detaining Power,chrw(133) ” means that a prisoner cannot be turned over to an international tribunal for trial unless the Detaining Power does the same with respect to its own soldiers. That seems unlikely.
Art. 25.
Signed Oct. 18, 1907, arts. i, 5, and 6, Martens, Nouveau Recueil Général, 3d ser., vol. 3, p. 604.
Art. 2.
Geneva Wounded and Sick Convention. art. 19; Geneva Civilians Convention, art. 18.
Dec. ii, 1922, General Report of the Commission of Jurists at The Hague, American Journal of International Law, vol. 17 Supp. (1923), P. 245.
Arts. 22 and 24, para. i.
Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, 1971, vol. 3(1971), P. 49.
I.C.R.C., Annual Report, 1957, pp. 83-84.
Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, vol. 53 (II) (1969), p. 358.
See, e.g. Schwarzenberger, The Legality of Nuclear Weapons (1958). pp. 26–49.
Art. 23, para. a.
Martens, Nouveau Recueil Général, 3d ser., vol. 3, p. 533.
Id. at p. 557.
Id. at p. 580.
Id. at p. 604.
Id. at p. 663.
Id. at p. 713.
Signed April 16, 1856, Martens, Nouveau Recueil Général, vol. 15, p. 791
Signed Feb. 26, 1909, British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 104, p. 242.
Signed April 22, 193o, art. 22, L.N.T.S., vol. 112, p. 65 at p. 88.
Procès-Verbal concerning Rules of Submarine Warfare, signed at London,Nov. 6, 1936, L.N.T.S., vol. 173, p. 253.
Tucker, The Law of War and Neutrality at Sea, United States Naval War College, International Law Studies, vol. 5o (1957), pp. 3o-32, 254-258, 305-307, 312–315.
Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, Opinion and Judgment (1947), p. 140.
The impact of new technology on naval operations and, as a result, on the law of naval warfare is illuminatingly analyzed by D. P. O’Connell, in “International Law and Contemporary Naval Operations”, in British Year Book of International Law., vol. 44 (1970), p. 19, and “The Legality of Naval Cruise Missiles”, in American Journal of International Law, vol. 66 (1972), p. 785.
See Medlicott, The Economic Blockade, vol. 1 (1952) and vol. 2 (1959).
Resolution XXVIII, Protection of Civilian Populations against the Dangers of Indiscriminate Warfare, XXth International Conference of the Red Cross, Resolutions (1965), p. 22.
Resolution XXIII, Human Rights in Armed Conflicts, May 12, 1968, Final Act of the International Conference on Human Rights, Teheran, 22 April to 13 May 1968 (U.N. Doc. A/CONF. 32/1o) (1968), p. 18.
Dec. 19, 1968, Gen. Ass. Off. Rec., 23d Sess., Supp. No 18 (A17218) (1969),p. 50.
Respect for Human Rights in Armed Conflict; Reports of the Secretary-General, U.N. Docs. A/772o (1969) and A/8o52 (1970).
I.C.R.C., Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva, 24 May-12 June 1971, 8 volumes variously titled (1971).
See I.C.R.C., Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts (Geneva, 24 May-12 June 1971), Report on the Work of the Conference (1971).
I.C.R.C., Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Devel- opment of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts
See Conference of Government Experts on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Second Session, 3 May-3 June 1972, Report on the Work of the Conference, 2 vols. (1972).
Resolutfon 3032 (XXVII), Jan. 23, 1973, Doc. A/RES/3o32 (XXVII) (1973)
Napalm and other incendiary weapons and all aspects of their possibe use; Report of the Secretary-General, U.N. Doc. A/88o3 (1972).
Cited supra n. 61.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baxter, R.R. (1973). The Law of War. In: Bos, M. (eds) The Present State of International Law and Other Essays. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4497-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4497-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-4499-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-4497-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive