Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Infiltration of Equity into English Commercial Law

  • Chapter
The Cambridge-Tilburg Law Lectures

  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

From time to time attempts have been made to introduce equitable doctrine into the corpus of English commercial law. For example judges have occasionally flirted with the concept of a ‘trust of a promise’, in an attempt to enable C to sue on a contract which A had made with B for his benefit. But the flirtation was shortlived. There was no easy answer to the artificial question, when did B hold his right to sue A on trust for C? 1 Moreover, to imply such a trust would generally be quite inconsistent with the commerical expectations of A and B since it would mean they could never vary or revoke the terms of the contract even though they might subsequently wish to do so.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Glanville Williams, (1944–1945) 7 Modern Law Review 123.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. the observations of Lord Denning M.R. in Beswick v. Beswick [1966] Ch. 638, 555.

    Google Scholar 

  3. [1895] 2 Q.B. 539.

    Google Scholar 

  4. At p. 545.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson v. Larholt [1948] 1 K.B. 339.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd. v. Cradock (No. 3) [1968] 1 W.L.R. 1555; Karak Rubber Co. Ltd. v. Burden (No. 2) [1972] 1 W.L.R. 602. 7. Companies Act 1948. s. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gray v. Johnston (1868) L.R. 3 H.L.1. Shields v. Bank of Ireland [1901] 1 I.R. 222, 232–233, per Porter M.R.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carl-Zeiss Stiftung v. Herbert Smith & Co. [1969] 2 Ch. 276, 296, per Sachs L.J., 301, per Edmund Davies L.J., Belmont Finance Corp. Ltd. v. Williams Furniture Ltd. [1978] 3 W.L.R. 712, 728, per Buckley LJ.. 734. per Goff L.J.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gray v. Johnston (1868) 3 H.L. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manchester Trust v. Furness [1895] 2 Q.B. 539, 545 ; ante p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  11. London Joint Stock Bank v. Simmons [18921 A.C. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bank of England v. Fagan (1849) 7 Moo. P.C. 61, 72, cited in London Joint Stock Bank v. Simmons [1892] A.C. 201, 219, 221, per Lord Herschell.

    Google Scholar 

  13. s. 95 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  14. [1972] Ch. 446.

    Google Scholar 

  15. [1974] 1 W.L.R. 1648.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barclays Bank Ltd. v. Quistclose Investment Co. [1970] A.C. 567.

    Google Scholar 

  17. s. 38 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cf. post pp. 54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  19. s. 38 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  20. The cases are discussed in Williams on Bankruptcy (18th ed.), pp. 329–330. Moreover the ‘reputed ownership’ clause has no application in the winding up of companies.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cf. Barclays Bank Ltd. v. Quistclose Investment Co. [1970] A.C. 567.

    Google Scholar 

  22. [1975] 1 W.L.R. 279.

    Google Scholar 

  23. At p. 280.

    Google Scholar 

  24. At pp. 281–282.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cf. Coptic v. Bailey [1972] Ch. 446, criticised ante p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  26. The full title is: Aluminium Industrie Vaasen B. V. v. Romalpa Aluminium Ltd. [1976] 1 W.L.R. 676.

    Google Scholar 

  27. The clause reads in Dutch as follows: De eigendom van het door A.I.V. te leveren materiaal gaat eerst op koper over zodra deze al hetgeen hij uit welken hoofde ook aan A.I.V. verschuldigd is, aan A.I.V. heeft voldaan. Tot aan het tijdstip van betaling is koper gehouden dit materiaal op te slaan op een wijze die het als eigendom van A.I.V. kenbaar doet zijn, indien A.I.V. zulks verlangt. A.I.V. en koper komen overeen dat, indien koper van het materiaal (een) nieuw(e) voorwerp(en) vormt of doet vormen, dit materiaal met (een) ander(e) voorwerp(en) vermengt of indien dit materiaal op enigerlei andere wijze bestanddeel wordt van (een) ander(e) voorwerp(en) A.I.V. de eigendom van dit (deze) nieuwe voorwerp(en) zal verkrijgen tot zekerheid van de volledige betaling van het door koper aan A.I.V. verschuldigde. A.I.V. en koper komen daartoe reeds nu overeen, dat de eigendom van bedoeld(e), al dan niet voltooid(e) voorwerp(en) aan A.I.V. zal/zullen worden overgedragen en dat deze eigendomsoverdracht geacht zal worden plaats te hebben door en op het tijdstip van de enkele handeling of gebeuren waardoor het materiaal wordt omgevormd tot (een) nieuw(e) voorwerp(en), dan wel vermengd wordt met of bestanddeel wordt van (een) ander(e) voorwerp(en). Tot aan het tijdstip van de volledige betaling van het door koper aan A.I.V. verschuldigde zal koper de (het) desbetreffende voorwerp(en) houden voor A.I.V. in diens hoedanigheid van fiduciair eigenaar en desverlangd dit (deze) voorwerp(en), als zodanig kenbaar, opslaan. Koper zal niettemin gerechtigd zijn deze voorwerpen in het kader van zijn normale bedrijfsuitoefening aan derden te verkopen en te leveren, met dien verstande dat — indien A.I.V. zulks wenst — koper, zolang hij niet volledig aan zijn betalingsverplichtingen tegenover A.I.V. heeft voldaan, de uit deze verkopen aan koper tegenover zijn afnemers toekomende vorderingen aan A.I.V. zal overdragen.

    Google Scholar 

  28. I am informed by Judge Willems that this was an unfortunate assumption. Fiduciair eigenaar do not mean that the manufacturer is a trustee. The ‘words go back to the Roman law concept of fiducia cum creditore.’

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ante n. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Companies Act 1948, s. 95 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  31. [1976] 1. W.L.R. at pp. 689–670, per Roskill L.J.

    Google Scholar 

  32. This appears from the fuller report in [19761 2 All E.R. 55 2, 567.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The Times’, November 15 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  34. (1880) 13 Ch. D. 696, on which see Hanbury and Maudsley,Modern Equity, p. 565 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35a. The judgments of the Court are now reported [1979] 3 W.L.R. 672. .

    Google Scholar 

  36. [1979] 3 W.L.R. 629.

    Google Scholar 

  37. (1848) 2 H.L. C. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  38. [1931] 2 K.B. 515.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See, generally, Hanbury and Maudsley, Modern Equity, chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lumley v. Wagner (1852) 1 De G.M. & G. 604.

    Google Scholar 

  41. SkyPetroleum Ltd. v. V.I.P. Petroleum Ltd. [1974] 1 All E.R. 954.

    Google Scholar 

  42. De Mattos v. Gibson (1858) 4 De G. & J. 276, 282, per Knight-Bruce L.J.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Taddy & Co. v. Sterious & Co. [1904] 1 Ch. 354; McGruther v. Pitcher [1904J 2 Ch. 306.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lord Strathcona Steamship Co. Ltd v. Dominion Coal Co. [1926] A.C. 108. This was in fact a decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ante n. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Port Line Ltd v. Ben Line Steamers Ltd [1958] 2 Q.B. 146, 168, per Diplock J.

    Google Scholar 

  47. [1979] 2 All E.R. 853.

    Google Scholar 

  48. [1979] 2 All E.R. 853, 874, per Browne-Wilkinson J.; italics supplied

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ante n. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Manchester Ship Canal Co. v. Manchester Racecourse Co. [1901] 2 Ch. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v. Selfridge & Co. Ltd [1915] A.C. 847.

    Google Scholar 

  52. On undisclosed principals, see B.S. Markesinis and R.J.C. Munday, An Outline of the Law of Agency. pu. 118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ante n. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  54. [1915] A.C. 847, 855.

    Google Scholar 

  55. The authorities are discussed by Scrutton J. in L.C.C. v. Allan [1914] 3 K.B 642

    Google Scholar 

  56. (1890) 45 Ch. D. 1,14. .

    Google Scholar 

  57. Nippon Yusen Kaisha v. Karageorgis [1975] 1 W.L.R. 1093; Mareva Compania Naviera S.A. v. International Bulk Carriers [1975] 2 Lloyds Rep 509; MBPXL Corpn. v. International Banking Corpn. [1975] Court of Appeal Transcript 411; Rasu Maritime S.A. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minjak Dan Gas Bumi Negara (Pertamina) and Government of Indonesia (as interveners) [1978] Q.B. 644; Cretanor Maritime Co. Ltd v. Irish Management Ltd [1978] 1 W.L.R. 966; The Assios [1979] 1 Lloyds Rep 331; Third Chandris Shipping Corpn. v. Unimarine S.A. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972.

    Google Scholar 

  58. The Siskina [1977] 3 W. L. R. 818.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mareva Compania Naviera S.A. v. International Bulk Carriers [1975] 2 Lloyds Rep 509.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Woodthorpe Brandon, A. Treatise upon the Customary Law of Foreign Attachment (London, 1861), p.7.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Pennoyer v. Ness, 95 U.S. 714, 723–724, per Justice Field (1877). In France the procedure is known as saisie conservatoire.

    Google Scholar 

  62. See text accompanying notes 63 and 64 post.

    Google Scholar 

  63. [1975] 1 W.L.R. 1093.

    Google Scholar 

  64. At pp. 1094–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  65. [1975] 2 Lloyds Rep 509.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Unreported; [1975] Court of Appeal Transcript 411.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Cited in Third Chandris Shipping Corpn. v. Unimarine S.A. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972, 975, per Mustill J.

    Google Scholar 

  68. [1978] Q.B. 644.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Cited in [1978] Q.B. 644, 660–661.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Third Chandris Shipping Corpn. v. Unimarine S.A. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972, 976, per Mustill J.

    Google Scholar 

  71. See note 70.

    Google Scholar 

  72. [1977] 3 W.L.R. 818.

    Google Scholar 

  73. [1978] 1 W.L.R. 966.

    Google Scholar 

  74. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972.

    Google Scholar 

  75. See text accompanying footnote 69.

    Google Scholar 

  76. The Assios [19 79] 1 Lloyds Rep 331.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Third Chandris Shipping Corpn. v. Unimarine S A. [1979] 2 All E. R. 972, 984, per Lord Denning M.R., citing The Assios [1979] 1 Lloyds Rep 331.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ante n. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  79. MPBXL Corpn. v. Intercontinental Banking Corpn. [1975] Court of Appeal Transcript 411.

    Google Scholar 

  80. See Cretanor Maritime Co. Ltd. v. Irish Marine Management Ltd [1978] 1 W.L.R. 966, 972.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Ante n. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ante n. 77

    Google Scholar 

  83. Cretanor Maritime Co. Ltd v. Irish Management Ltd. [1978] 1 W.L.R. 966.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Third Chandris Shipping Corpn. v. Unimarine S.A. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972, 985, per Lord Denning M.R., 988, per Lawton and Cumming-Bruce L.JJ.

    Google Scholar 

  85. [1979] 1 All E.R. 398. These observations were obiter.

    Google Scholar 

  86. See text accompanying footnote 67.

    Google Scholar 

  87. [1978] Q.B. 644. 661.

    Google Scholar 

  88. [1975] A.C. 396.

    Google Scholar 

  89. [1978] Q.B. 644, 664. See also Cretanor Maritime Co. Ltd. v. Irish Management Ltd. [1978] 1 W.L.R. 966, 975, per Buckley L.J.

    Google Scholar 

  90. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972.

    Google Scholar 

  91. [1975] A.C. 396.

    Google Scholar 

  92. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972. 977.

    Google Scholar 

  93. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972, 985, 987, 988.

    Google Scholar 

  94. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972, 987.

    Google Scholar 

  95. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972, 987.

    Google Scholar 

  96. [19791 2 All E.R. 972. 985. 987–8.

    Google Scholar 

  97. [1977] 3 W.L.R. 818.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Third Chandris Shipping Corpn. v. Unimarine S.A. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972, 983, per Lord Denning M.R.

    Google Scholar 

  99. [1978] 1 W.L.R. 966. Cf. now Iraqi Ministry of Defence v. Arcepey Shipping Co. S.A. [1980] 1 All E.R. 480.

    Google Scholar 

  100. [1978] 1 W.L.R. 966, 974, per Buckley L.J.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Ante n. 100; as did the old procedure of foreign attachment.

    Google Scholar 

  102. See text accompanying footnote 69.

    Google Scholar 

  103. [1978] 3 W.L.R. 818, 830.

    Google Scholar 

  104. There are hints in Pertamina [1978] Q.B. 644.

    Google Scholar 

  105. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972, 983–984.

    Google Scholar 

  106. March 16, 1979. It is now reported in: [1980] 1 All E.R. 205. Contrast The Agrabele [1979] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 112.

    Google Scholar 

  107. (1890) 45 Ch. D. 1, 14; Ante p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  108. See Sir Michael Kerr’s remarks in (1978) 41 M.L.R. 1, 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  109. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972, 978.

    Google Scholar 

  110. [19 78] 1 W. L. R. 966.

    Google Scholar 

  111. [1978] 1 W.L.R. 966, 974, per Buckley L.J.

    Google Scholar 

  112. [1978] Q.B. 644, 662.

    Google Scholar 

  113. [1978] 1 W.L.R. 966, 974–975.

    Google Scholar 

  114. [1978] 3 W.L.R. 818, 830.

    Google Scholar 

  115. The Assios [1970] 1 Lloyds Rep 331, 334. See also Third ChandrisShippingCorpn. v. Unimarine S.A. 11979].

    Google Scholar 

  116. [1979] 2 All E.R. 972, 983.

    Google Scholar 

  117. See now, Monleachi v. Shinco (U.K.) Ltd [19791. W.L.R. 1180.

    Google Scholar 

  118. This was done in Rena K [1979] 1 All E.R. 397.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. G. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

B. S. Markesinis J. H. M. Willems

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 J. A. Jolowicz and G. Jones, Cambridge, England

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, G. (1980). The Infiltration of Equity into English Commercial Law. In: Markesinis, B.S., Willems, J.H.M. (eds) The Cambridge-Tilburg Law Lectures. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4414-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4414-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-268-1166-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-4414-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation