Skip to main content

The role of selectional restrictions, phonotactics and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English

  • Chapter
Yearbook of Morphology 2001

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Morphology ((YOMO))

Abstract

At least since Siegel (1974) there has been a debate about the principles and mechanisms that constrain the combinatorial properties of affixes, in particular of English suffixes. A classic example to illustrate the problem of combinatorial restrictions is given in (1):

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, Margaret (1979). Morphological Investigations. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Connecticut. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, Mark, and Nanna Fuhrhop (2001). Restricting suffix combinations in English. Closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint. Ms. SUNY/Universität Konstanz [to appear in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory].

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen Harald (1989). A Corpus-based Approach to Morphological Productivity. Ph.D. Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, Harald (1993). On frequency, transparency and productivity. In G. Booij and J. an Marie (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 1992. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 131–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, Harald (To appear). Probability in morphology. In R. Bod, J. Hay and S. Jannedy (eds.) Probability Theory in Linguistics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, Harald, Rochelle Lieber, and Robert Schreuder (1997). The morphological complexity of simplex nouns. Linguistics 35, 861–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Laurie (2001). Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bertram, R., Harald Baayen, and Robert Schreuder (2000). Effects of familiy size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language 42, 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert E. (1994). Lexical Phonology: A Review. In Richard Wiese (ed.) Recent Developments in Lexical Phonology (Arbeiten des Sonderforschungsbereichs ‘Theorie des Lexikons’ Nr. 56 ). Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine-Universität, 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, Geert E. (2002). Prosodic restrictions on stacking up affixes. This volume. Dalton-Puffer, Christiane, and Ingo Plag (In press). Categorywise, some compound-type morphemes seem to be rather suffix-like. On the status of -fill, -type, and -wise in Present Day English. Folio Linguistica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabb, Nigel (1988). English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 527–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giegerich, Heinz J. (1999). Lexical Strata in English. Morphological Causes, Phonological Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Jennifer (2000). Causes and Consequences of Word Structure. Ph.D. dissertation. Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Jennifer and Harald Baayen (This volume). Parsing and productivity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, John (1994). A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krott, Andrea, Harald Baayen, and Rob Schreuder (2001). Analogy in morphology: modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics 39, 51–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudanna, Alessandro and Cristina Burani (1985). Distributional properties of derivational affixes. In L.B. Feldman (ed.) Morphological Aspects of Language Processing. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 345–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul (1982). Lexical Morphology and Phonology, in The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.) Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co., 1–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanan, Karuvannur P. (1986). The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • OED2 on CD (1994). The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd Edition, on Compact Disc. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plag, Ingo (1996). Selectional restrictions in English suffixation revisited. A reply to Fabb (1988). Linguistics 34, 769–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plag, Ingo (1999). Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plag, Ingo, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, and Harald Baayen (1999). Morphological productivity across speech and writing. English Language and Linguistics 3, 209–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffelsiefen, Renate (1999). Phonological constraints on English word-formation. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marie (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1998. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 225–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saciuk, Bogdan (1969). The strata] division of the lexicon. Papers in Linguistics 1: 464–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder, Robert, and Harald Baayen (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language 36, 118–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth (1982). The Syntax of Words. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Dorothy (1974). Topics in English Morphology. Ph.D. thesis. MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Andrew (1991). Morphological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Heuven, Vincent J., Neijt, Anneke and Maarten Hijzelendoorn (1994). Automatische indeling van Nederlandse worden op basis van etymologische filters. Spektator 23, 279–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Plag, I. (2002). The role of selectional restrictions, phonotactics and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English. In: Booij, G., Van Marle, J. (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 2001. Yearbook of Morphology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3726-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3726-5_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6061-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3726-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics