Skip to main content

Morphological selection and representational modularity

  • Chapter
Yearbook of Morphology 2001

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Morphology ((YOMO))

Abstract

In much work on word formation, the morpho-phonological properties of morphemes are strictly separated from their semantic and morpho-syntactic properties. A morpheme is not a unit taken from the lexicon and combined with other morphemes. Rather, its semantic and morpho-syntactic features are inserted in the semantic and morpho-syntactic components respectively, while only the morpho-phonological component contains its overt form. The three representations thus formed must of course be related, something which is achieved by a set of mapping principles. A range of proposals along these lines can be found in Sproat (1985), Anderson (1992), Halle & Marantz (1993), Beard (1995) and Jackendoff (1997), amongst others. We will refer to models of this type as representationally modular (borrowing a term from Jackendoff).1

Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the University of Groningen, the University of Essex and the GLOW Workshop on Null Morphology in Billbao. We would like to thank the audiences for comments. We would further like to thank Gunlög Josefsson, Jack Hoeksema, Vieri Samek-Lodovici, Maaike Schoorlemmer, Andrew Spencer, Hans van de Koot, Fred Weerman, Moira Yip and two anonymous reviewers for YoM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abasheikh, M. (1978). The Grammar of Chimwi:ni Causatives. PhD dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abney, S. (1987). The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation. MIT. Ackema, P. (1999a). Issues in Morphosyntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackema, P. (1999b). The Nonuniform Structure of Dutch N—V Compounds. In: G. Booij and J. van Marie (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1998. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 127–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackema, P. and A. Neeleman (2001). Competition between Syntax and Morphology. In: G. Legendre, J. Grimshaw and S. Vikner (eds.), Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 29–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexiadou, A. (1997). Adverb Placement; A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, M. and S. Sridhar (1983). Morphological Levels in English and Kannada; or Atarizing Reagan. In Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax, Proceedings of CLS 19. Chicago: CLS, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. (1985). The Mirror Principle and Morphosyntactic Explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 373–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation; A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. (2000). On Category Asymmetries in Derivational Morphology. Ms. Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L. (1981). English Word-Formation. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, R. (1988). On the Separation of Derivation from Morphology: Toward a Lexeme-Morpheme Based Morphology. Quaderni di Semantica 9, 3–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, R. (1991). Decompositional Composition: The Semantics of Scope Ambiguities in `Bracketing Paradoxes’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 195–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, H. and P. Wehrmann (1990). On the Categorial Status of Present Participles. In: R. Bok-Bennema and P. Coopmans (eds.), Linguististics in the Netherlands 1990. Dordrecht: Foris, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, J. (2000). Adverbs: The Hierarchy Paradox. Clot International 4. 9 /10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, G. (1977). Dutch Morphology; A Study of Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, G. (1986). ER als vormer van subjectsnamen: de verhouding tussen morfologie en syntaxis. GLOT 9, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, G. (1996). Inherent versus Contextual Inflection and the Split Morphology Hypothesis. In: G. Booij and J. van Marie (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booij, G. (2002). The Morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, H. (2000). Exo-skeletal vs. Endo-skeletal Explanations: Syntactic projection and the Lexicon. Ms. University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsley, R. and J. Kornfilt (2000). Mixed Extended Projections. In: R. Borsley (ed.), The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories. New York: Academic Press, 101–31.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Botha, R. (1981). A Base Rule Theory of Afrikaans Synthetic Compounding. In: M. Moortgat and T. Hoekstra (eds.), The Scope of Lexical Rules. Dordrecht: Foris, 1–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J. (1997). Mixed Categories as Head Sharing Constructions. In: M. Butt and T. Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG97 Conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J. (2000). Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, J. and S. Mchombo (1995). The Lexical Integrity Principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13, 181–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, M. (1995). Lexico-Logical Form; A Radically Minimalist Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads; A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. and B. Hecht (1982). Learning to Coin Agent and Instrument Nouns. Cognition 12, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E., B. Hecht and R. Mulford (1986). Acquiring Complex Compounds: Affixes and Word Order in English. Linguistics 24, 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haas, W. and M. Trommelen (1993). Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands. Den Haag: SDU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, A.-M. and E. Williams (1987). On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Don, J. (1993). Morphological Conversion. PhD dissertation. Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erguvanli, E. (1984). The Function of Word Order in Turkish Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabb, N. (1988). English Suffixation is Constrained Only by Selectional Restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 527–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, J., T. Roeper and H. Borer (2001). The VP within Process Nominals: Evidence from Adverbs and the VP Anaphor Do-So. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19, 549–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J. (1979). Complement Selection and the Lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 279–326. Grimshaw, J. (1986). A Morphosyntactic Explanation for the Mirror Principle. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 745–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groos, A. (1989). Particle-Verbs and Adjunction. In: H. Bennis and A. van Kemenade (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1989. Dordrecht: Foris, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, H. (2000). Adverb Placement: Convergence of Structure and Licensing. Theoretical Linguistics 26, 95–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hâkansson, G. (1998). Sprâkinlärning hos barn. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, M. and A. Marantz (1993). Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In K. Hale and S.J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockett, C. (1954). Two Models of Grammatical Description, Word 10, 210–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J. (1984). Categorial Morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J. (1988). Head-Types in Morpho-Syntax. In: G. Booij and J. van Marie (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1988. Dordrecht: Foris, 123–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J. (1998). Verb Movement in Dutch Present-Participle Clauses. Ms. University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, J. (1997). The Syntax of Infinitives in Frisian. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, T. (1986). Deverbalization and Inheritance. Linguistics 24, 549–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, T. and P. Wehrmann (1985). De nominale infinitief. Clot 8, 257–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, N. and I. San Martin (2000). Obviation as Anti-control. Paper presented at Glow 2000, University of the Basque Country.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, L. (2001). Templatic and/or Compositional Morphology: Suffix Ordering in Bantu. Paper presented at UCL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, S. and D. Zec (eds.) (1990). The Phonology-Syntax Interface. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1977). X-Bar Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1997). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. and S. Vikner (1994). The Position of the Verb in Scandinavian Infinitives: in V° or in C° but not in I°, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 53, 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical Morphology and Phonology. In: I.-S. Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 3–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruisinga, E. (1932). A Handbook of Present-day English vol. 2 (fifth reprint). Utrecht: Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe, S. (1999). Dual Lexical Categories vs. Phrasal Conversion in the Analysis of Gerund Phrases. In: P. de Lacy and A. Nowak (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 24. Amherst: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, C. and P. Muysken (1988). Mixed Categories. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R. (1983). Argument Linking and Compounding in English. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 251–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber, R. (1992). Deconstructing Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malouf, R. (1998). Mixed Categories in the Hierarchical Lexicon. PhD dissertation. Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, A. (1984). On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, A. (1997). No Escape from Syntax or: Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon. In: A. Dimitriadis et. al. (eds.), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4, 201–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R. (1973). The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English. Reprinted in: R Thomason (ed.) 1974, Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muysken, P. (1988). Affix Order and Interpretation: Quechua. In: M. Everaert, A. Evers, R. Huybregts and M. Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and Modularity. Dordrecht: Foris, 259–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. (1984). Zero-Derivation and Inflection. In M. Speas and R. Sproat (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 7: Papers from the January 1984 MIT Workshop in Morphology, 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeleman, A. and J. Schipper (1992). Verbal Prefixation in Dutch: Thematic Evidence for Conversion. In G. Booij and J. van Marie (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1992, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 57–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeleman, A. and H. van de Koot (2002). The Configurational Matrix. Linguistic Inquiry 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeleman, A. and E Weerman (1999). Flexible Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nespor, M. and I. Vogel (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyer, R. (1993). Optimal Words: Towards a Declarative Theory of Word formation. Ms. Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouhalla, J. (1991). Functional Categories and Parametric Variation. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, D. (1985). Morphology and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 193–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1998). Words and Rules. Lingua 106, 219–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C. and I. Sag (1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullum, G. (1991). English Nominal Gerund Phrases as Noun Phrases with Verb Phrase Heads. Linguistics 29, 763–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, J. (1982). Morphological Structure and Language Acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Amherst: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuland, E. (1988). Relating Morphological and Syntactic Structure. In: M. Everaert, A. Evers, R. Huybregts and M. Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and Modularity. Dordrecht: Foris, 303–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1989). Two Types of Noun Incorporation: A Lexical Analysis. Language 65, 294–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadock, J. (1991). Autolexical Syntax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalise, S. (1988). The Notion of `Head’ in Morphology. In G. Booij and J. van Marie (eds). Yearbook of Morphology 1988. Dordrecht: Foris, 229–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoorlemmer, M. (1999). Structure Building and Mixed Categories. Ms. Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoorlemmer, M. (2001). Dutch Nominalised Infinitives as Non-Identical Twins. UiL OTS Working Paper (uil-ots-01005-CL/TL). Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. (1982). The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax; The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. (1986). On Derived Domains in Sentence Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3, 371–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, P. and F. Otanes (1972). Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, A. (1988). Bracketing Paradoxes and the English Lexicon. Language 64, 663–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, A. (1999). Transpositions and Argument Structure. In: G. Booij and J. van Marie (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1998. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 73–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, R. (1985). On Deriving the Lexicon. PhD Dissertation. MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, R. (1988). Bracketing Paradoxes, Cliticization and Other Topics: The Mapping between Syntactic and Phonological Structure. In: M. Everaert, A. Evers, R. Huybregts and M. Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and Modularity. Dordrecht: Foris, 339–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Beurden, L. (1987). Playing Level with Dutch Morphology. In: E Beukema and P. Coopmans (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1987. Dordrecht: Foris, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Haaften, T.S. van de Kerke, M. Middelkoop and P. Muysken (1986). Nominalisaties in het Nederlands. GLOT 8, 67–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasow, T. (1977). Transformations and the Lexicon. In: P. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 327–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wescoat, M. (1994). Phrase Structure, Lexical Sharing, Partial Ordering and the English Gerund. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 20. 587–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1981). On the Notions “Lexically Related” and “Head of a Word”. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 245–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1982). Another Argument that Passive is Transformational. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 160–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (2002). Representation Theory. Ms. Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, M. (1978). The Integrity of Lexical Nodes. Ms. MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, J. (1996). Nominal Gerund Phrases in English as Phrasal Zero Derivations. Linguistics 34, 329–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon J. and N. Bonet-Farran (1991). The Ambivalent Nature of Spanish Infinitives. In: D. Wanner and D. Kibbee (eds.), New Analyses in Romance Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 353–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, A. (1977). On Clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ackema, P., Neeleman, A. (2002). Morphological selection and representational modularity. In: Booij, G., Van Marle, J. (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 2001. Yearbook of Morphology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3726-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3726-5_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6061-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3726-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics