Skip to main content

A correspondence-theoretic analysis of Dalabon transitive paradigms

  • Chapter
Yearbook of Morphology 2000

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Morphology ((YOMO))

Abstract

In the preceding paper, Evans, Brown and Corbett (henceforth: EBC) presented the complex system of pronominal prefixation in Dalabon. They proposed an analysis that describes this system by a number of statements associated with the nodes of a Network Morphology. Some of these statements have the formal nature of referrals (Zwicky 1985, Stump 1993): certain category combinations are realized by the morphological exponent of other combinations. I find the notion of referral problematic for theoretical reasons (because it is too powerful a device), but especially in the context of language acquisition; it requires the child who tries to identify morphemes as the exponents of some category combinations to look also at other category combinations. It would be easier for the child to analyze word forms into minimal contrastive elements that bear information themselves. In the end, the child may have identified certain morphemes to be underspecified, covering more than one category combination, or more than one cell of a paradigm (Wunderlich 1996a, Noyer 1998).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, Stephen R. (1992) A-morphous morphology. Cambridge University Press. Bickel, Balthasar, Walter Bisang, and Yogendra P. Yadava (1999) Face vs. empathy: the social foundation of Maithili verb agreement. Linguistics 37, 481–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blevins, James P. (2000) Markedness and blocking in German declensional paradigms. In Barbara Stiebels and Dieter Wunderlich (eds.) Lexicon in Focus, 83–103. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, Reinhard (1999) Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Ms. Humboldt University Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonet, Eulàlia (1991) Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance languages. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Dunstan (forthcoming) Declension and conjugation. In: D. Alan Cruse et al. (eds.) Lexicology: An International Handbook on the Nature and Structure of Words and Vocabularies. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson (1978) Universals in language use: politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (ed.) Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction, 56–311. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (1988) Comments on the paper by Noyer. In Steven G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari and Patrick M. Farrell (eds.) Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 286–301. CSLI Publications. 252 Dieter Wunderlich

    Google Scholar 

  • Curnow, Timothy Jowan (1998) Maung verbal agreement revisited: a response to Donohue (1993). Australian Journal of Linguistics 19, 141–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue, Mark (1998) A note on verbal agreement in Maung. Australian Journal of Linguistics 13, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Nicholas, Dunstan Brown, and Greville Corbett (2000) Dalabon pronominal pre-fixes and the typology of syncretism: a Network Morphology analysis. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, Birgit (1998) Optimale Klitiksequenzen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 17, 35–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz (1993) Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds) The view from building 20, 111–76. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Jeffrey (1998) Pragmatic skewing in 1–2 pronominal combinations in native American languages. JAL 64: 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, Sharon (1994) The consequences of optimization for underspecification. NETS 25, 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, Gerhard (1999) Optimal syntax and optimal semantics. Paper presented at the DIP Colloquium. University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakämper, Renate, and Dieter Wunderlich (1998) Person marking in Quechua–A constraint-based minimalist analysis. Lingua 105, 113–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John J., and Alan S. Prince (1995) Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18, 249–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyer, Rolf (1998) Impoverishment theory and morphosyntactic markedness. In Steven G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari and Patrick M. Farrell (eds.) Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 264–85. CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Susan (1995) Towards a theory of morphological information. Language 71, 260–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiebels, Barbara (2000) Linker inventories, Linking splits and lexical economy. In Barbara Stiebels and Dieter Wunderlich (eds) Lexicon in Focus. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 211–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, Gregory (1993) On rules of referral. Language 69, 449–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, Dieter (1996a) Minimalist morphology: the role of paradigms. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marie (eds.) Yearbook of f Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 93–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, Dieter (1996b) A minimalist model of inflectional morphology. In Chris Wilder, Hans-Martin Gärtner and Manfred Bierwisch (eds.) The Role of Economy Principles in LinguisticTheory, 267–98. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, Dieter (1997) Cause and the structure of verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 27–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich (2000) How gaps and substitutions can become optimal: the pronominal affix paradigms of Yimas. To appear in Transactions of the Philological Society, special issue on lexical paradigms, ed. James P. Blevins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, Arnold (1985) How to describe inflection. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 11, 372–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wunderlich, D. (2001). A correspondence-theoretic analysis of Dalabon transitive paradigms. In: Booij, G., Van Marle, J. (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 2000. Yearbook of Morphology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3724-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3724-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5738-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3724-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics