Abstract
In the seventies and eighties, the typical research question of psycholinguists interested in morphology was on whether or not morphological structure plays a role in on-line processing in language comprehension and speech production. It has become clear that this research question, which from a linguistic perspective has always been extremely naive, is also quite unproductive from a psychological point of view. Fortunately, a much wider range of issues is currently under investigation. A picture of morphological processing in the mental lexicon is now emerging in which the relevance of morphology is not an all or nothing issue. Instead, the functionality of morphological structure is now seen as hinging on a delicate balance of a series of factors. The goal of this paper is to outline the kinds of factors and their interrelations that are currently investigated experimentally. In this way, we hope to provide a frame of reference for the papers in this volume of the Yearbook of Morphology that are based on a workshop held at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in June, 1995, under the title ‘Morphology: why, how, when, when not, and why not’. We will first sketch three central psychological issues, and then proceed to a series of linguistically motivated topics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baayen, R.H., T. Dijkstra and R. Schreuder 1996. “Regular Morphology in Language Comprehension: Beyond ‘Rules or Representations’”. Manuscript, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Booij, G.E. 1994. “Against Split Morphology”. In G.E. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Year-book of Morphology 1993, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 27–49.
Cutler, A., J.A. Hawkins and G. Gilligan 1985. “The Suffixing Preference: a Processing Explanation“. Linguistics 23, 723–758.
Frauenfelder, U.H. and R. Schreuder 1992. “Constraining Psycholinguistic Models of Morphological Processing and Representation: the Role of Productivity”. In G.E. Booij and J. van Marle (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 165–183.
Grainger, J. and A.M. Jacobs 1996. “Orthographic Processing in Visual Word Recognition: a Multiple Read-out Model”. Psychological Review 103, 518–565.
Marslen-Wilson, W.D. 1990. “Activation, Competition, and Frequency in Lexical Access”. G.T.M. Altmann (ed), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 148–172.
Marslen-Wilson, W., L.K. Tyler, R. Waksler and L. Older 1994. “Morphology and Meaning in the English Mental Lexicon”. Psychological Review 101, 3–33.
McClelland, J.L. and D.E. Rumelhart (eds) 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing. Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol. 2: Psychological and Biological Models, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Pinker, S. 1991. “Rules of Language”, Science 153, 530–535.
Rumelhart, D.E. and J.L. McClelland 1986. “On Learning the Past Tenses of English Verbs”. In McClelland and Rumelhart (eds), 216–271.
Taft, M. 1979. “Recognition of Affixed Words and the Word Frequency Effect”. Memory and Cognition 7, 263–272.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baayen, H., Schreuder, R. (1997). Morphology: why, how, when, when not, and why not?. In: Booij, G., van Marle, J. (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 1996. Yearbook of Morphology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3718-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3718-0_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4854-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3718-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive