Abstract
I have posed the fundamental question in the philosophy of mathematics as ‘what does mathematics mean and how can we know for sure that it is true?’ Before developing my answer to this question, I must explain why I do not accept the orthodox answer, namely that mathematics is the study of sets and that our knowledge of mathematics is derived from our set-theoretic intuition using classical logic. In this chapter I shall argue that ‘set-theoretic intuition’, as formalised in the Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms with the axiom of choice (ZFC), is conceptually incoherent. In the following chapter I shall argue that infinite quantifiers, the distinctive feature of classical logic, are meaningless.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fletcher, P. (1998). What’s Wrong with Set Theory?. In: Truth, Proof and Infinity. Synthese Library, vol 276. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3616-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3616-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5105-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3616-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive