Skip to main content

Abstract

As it was been written in the call of the original workshop “In recent research on electronic commerce” trust has been recognized as one of the key factors for successful electronic commerce adoption. In electronic commerce problems of trust are magnified, because agents reach out far beyond their familiar trade environments. Also it is far from obvious whether existing paper-based techniques for fraud detection and prevention are adequate to establish trust in an electronic network environment where you usually never meet your trade partner face to face, and where messages can be read or copied a million times without leaving any trace. With the growing impact of electronic commerce distance trust building becomes more and more important, and better models of trust and deception are needed. One trend is that in electronic communication channels extra agents, the so called Trusted Third Parties, are introduced in an agent community that take care of trust building among the other agents in the network. But in fact different kind of trust are needed and should be modelled and supported:

  • trust in the environment and in the infrastructure (the socio-technical system);

  • trust in your agent and in mediating agents;

  • trust in the potential partners;

  • trust in the warrantors and authorities (if any).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bonniver Tuomela, M. (1999). A general account of trust, Tecnical Re-port, University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R. (1997). Delegation Conflicts, in M. Boman und W. Van de Velde (eds.) Multi-Agent Rationality, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1237. Springer-Verlag pg.234–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R., (1998) Towards a Theory of Delegation for Agent-based Systems, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Special issue on Multi-Agent Rationality, Elsevier Editor, Vol 24, Nos 3–4, pp. 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C. (1991). Social Power: a missed point in DAI, MA and HCI. In Decentralized AI. y. Demazeau J.P.Mueller (eds) ( Elsevier, Amsterdam ) 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C., Conte, R. (1997). Limits of economic and strategic Rationality for Agents and M-A Systems. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Special issue on Multi-Agent Rationality, Elsevier Editor, Vol 24, Nos 3–4„ pp. 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C. (1996). Commitment: from intentions to groups and organizations. In Proceedings of ICMAS’96,S.Francisco, AAAI-MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi C., Falcone R., (1998) Principles of trust for MAS: cogni-tive anatomy, social importance, and quantification, Proceedings of the International Conference of Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS’98), pp. 72–79, Paris, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi C., (1998), Modelling Social Action for AI Agents, Artifi-cial Intelligence, 103, pp. 157–182.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi C., (1996), Practical Permission,Workshop on Practical Reasoning and Rationality, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi C., (1997), Individual Social Action. In G. Holmstrom-Hintikka and R. Tuomela (eds), Contemporary Theory of action. Vol II, 163–92. Dordrecht, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Call for Papers, 1998 Autonomous Agents ‘88 Workshop on ‘Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societes’, Minneapolis/St Paul, USA, May 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C. (1995) Cognitive and Social Action, (Section 10 ). London, UCL Press,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C. Dignum, F. (1998). Autonomous Norms Acceptance. In J. Mueller, M. Singh, A.S. Rao (eds) Intelligent Agents V, Berlin, Springer, 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Dasgupta. (1990). Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta, editor, Trust. Chapter 4, pages 49–72. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demolombe R. (1997). Formalizing the Reliability of Agent’s Informa-tion, in Proceedings of the 4th ModelAge Workshop on ‘Formal Mod-els of Agents’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (Editor). (1990). Trust. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, D.P. and Hassmen, P. (1997). What it means to know something. Reports from the Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, N. 835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings. N.R. (1993). Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 3, 223–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Linder, B. (1996). Modal Logics for Rational Agents, PhD thesis, Department of Computing Science, University of Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. and Garrik, J. (1990). On the quantitative definition of risk. In Risk Analysis, Vol. 1, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In Diego Gambetta, editor, Trust. Chapter 6, pages 94–107. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, S. (1994). Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept, PhD thesis, Department of Computing Science, University of Stirling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.J.Ch., van der Hoek, W. (1992). A modal logic for nonmonotonic reasoning. In W. van der Hoek, J.J. Ch. Meyer, y. H. Tan and C. Witteveen, editors, Non-Monotonic Reasoning and Partial Semantics, pages 37–77. Ellis Horwood, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M., Cesta, A., Rizzo, P., Distributed Artificial Intelligence from a Socio-Cognitive Standpoint: Looking at Reasons for Interaction. Artificial Intelligence and Society, 1995, 9: 287–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pears, H. (1971) What is knowldege ?. N.Y., Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub W, Weesie J. (1990). Reputation and Efficiency in Social Interactions: an Example of Network Effects. American Journal of Sociology 96: 626–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sichman, J, R. Conte, C. Castelfranchi, Y. Demazeau. (1994). A social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks. In Proceedings of the 11th ECAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M., (1999), An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems, Arificial Intelligence and Law, Special Issue on Agents and Norms, Conte, R., Falcone, R., and Sartor, G. (eds), Vol. 7, Issue 1, March 1999, pp. 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, C. and Keren, G. (1996). Determinants of Trust, Proceedings of the workshop in honor of Amnon Rapoport, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA, 6–7 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P., (1998), Emotional Coherence: Trust, Empathy, Nationalism, Weakness of Will, Beauty, Humor, and Cognitive Therapy, Technical Report, University of Waterloo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R., (1995), The importance of us: a philosofical study of ba,sic social notions, Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E., (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, The Free press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C. (2001). Social Trust: A Cognitive Approach. In: Castelfranchi, C., Tan, YH. (eds) Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3614-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3614-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5687-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3614-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics