Skip to main content

Theory and Practice in Early Modern Physics

  • Chapter
Trends in the Historiography of Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 151))

Abstract

From the time of Aristotle to that of Galileo, physics had remained pure theory unmixed with knowledge gained from experience. Mechanics as a mixed science being regarded as subordinate and inferior to physics, the concept of a domain for the practice of physics did not exist until the seventeenth century. The practice of astronomy existed separately from the science of cosmology, and a certain tension between them held ever since Hipparchus and Geminus. A similar tension had held since antiquity between music theorists and practitioners of music. The same is true of architecture and hydraulics. But physics, by Aristotle’s definitions, had no practical component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Galileo’s Treatise de motu gravium,reprinted in Metaphysics and Measurement (London, 1968), p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Details are given in my `Hipparchus — Geminus — Galileo’, Stud. Hist. Philos. Science 20: 1 (1989), pp. 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Descartes to Marin Mersenne, 11 October 1638. Translated in S. Drake, Galileo at Work (Chicago 1978 ), pp. 387–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benedetti’s proposition is translated in I. E. Drabkin & S. Drake, Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy (Madison 1960), pp. 147–53 as it first appeared at Venice in 1553.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Translated in S. Drake, `A neglected Galilean letter’, Irnl. Hist. of Astron. 17 (1987), pp. 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johannes Kepler, Mysterium Cosmographicum, tr. A. M. Duncan (New York 1981), esp. pp. 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Drake, Galileo against the Philosophers (Los Angeles 1976), p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Claude Palisca, `Scientific Empiricism in Musical Thought’, in H. H. Rhys, ed., Seventeenth Century Science and the Arts (Princeton 1961 ), p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Details are given in the second edition of my translation of Galileo’s Two New Sciences (Toronto, Wall & Thompson, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Drake, S. (1994). Theory and Practice in Early Modern Physics. In: Gavroglu, K., Christianidis, J., Nicolaidis, E. (eds) Trends in the Historiography of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 151. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3596-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3596-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4264-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3596-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics