Advertisement

Can the History of Instrumentation Tell us Anything About Scientific Practice?

  • Yorgos Goudaroulis
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 151)

Abstract

“While philosophers and historians commonly speak of science in terms of theory and experiment, when they speak of the development of scientific knowledge, they speak in terms of theory alone.” A decade ago, this observation was generally true. The analysis of experimentation and instrumentation is a relatively new trend in the history and philosophy of science. The post-positivistic philosophy of science tended to focus on the theoretical aspects and created a framework unfriendly to the contributions of experiment, instrumentation, and measurement to scientific knowledge.1 Until very recently, both philosophers and historians of science paid very little attention to the “everyday activities” of scientists in the laboratory.

Keywords

Scientific Instrument Scientific Practice Vacuum Vessel Instrument Maker Scientific Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achinstein P. and Hannaway O., eds., 1985, Observation, Experiment and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baird D. and Faust T., 1990, `Scientific Instruments, Scientific Progress and the Cyclotron’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (2), pp. 147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Collins, H. M., 1985, Changing Order, Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Corsi P. and Weindling P., eds., 1983, Information Sources in the History of Science and Medicine, London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  5. Galison P., 1987, How Experiments End, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Galison P., 1988 a, `History, Philosophy, and the Central Metaphor’, Science in Context 2, pp. 197–212.Google Scholar
  7. Galison P., 1988b, `Philosophy in the Laboratory’, The Journal of Philosophy 85 (10), pp. 525–527.Google Scholar
  8. Galison P. and Assmus A., 1989, `Artificial Clouds, Real Particles’, in Gooding et al.,1989, pp. 225–274.Google Scholar
  9. Gavroglu K. and Goudaroulis Y., eds., 1991, Through Measurement to Knowledge. The Selected Papers of Heike Kamerlingh Onnes 1853–1926, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  10. Gooding D., 1989, `Magnetic Curves and the Magnetic Field: Experimentation andGoogle Scholar
  11. Representation in the History of a Theory’, in Gooding et al.,1989, pp. 183–224.Google Scholar
  12. Gooding D., Pinch T., and Schaffer S., eds., 1989, The Uses of Experiment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hacking I., 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hacking I., 1988, `On the Stability of the Laboratory Sciences’, The Journal of Philosophy 85 (10), pp. 507–514.Google Scholar
  14. Hacking I., 1989, `Philosophers of Experiment’, PSA 1988 2, pp. 147–156.Google Scholar
  15. Hackmann W. D. 1973, John and Jonathan Cuthbertson: The Invention and Development of the Eighteenth-Century Plate Electrical Machine,Leiden: Museum Boerhaave. Hackmann W. D. 1989, `Scientific Instruments: Models of Brass and Aids to Discovery’, in Gooding et al.,pp. 31–66.Google Scholar
  16. Hardin W. L., 1899, The Rise and Development of the Liquefaction of Gases, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Heilbron J. L., 1979, Electricity in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries,Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kamerlingh Onnes H., 1896, `Remarks on the Liquefaction of Hydrogen, on Thermodynamical Similarity, and on the Use of Vacuum Vessels’, Communications from the Physical Laboratory at the University of Leiden 23.Google Scholar
  19. Maddison F.R., 1963, `Early Astronomical and Mathematical Instruments. Brief Survey of Sources and Modern Studies’, History of Science 2, pp. 17–50.Google Scholar
  20. Marchis L., 1906, Production et utilisation du froid,Paris. McConnell A., 1980, Geomagnetic Instruments Before 1900,London: Harriet Wynter. Pinch T., 1986, Confronting Nature,Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  21. Price D. J. de S., 1984, `Of Sealing Wax and String’, Natural History 93 pp. 48–56. Schaffer S., 1989, `Glass Works: Newtons Prisms and the Uses of Experiment’, in Gooding et al.,1989, pp. 67–104.Google Scholar
  22. Shapin S. and Shaffer S., 1985, Leviathan and the Air-Pump, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Turner G. L. E., 1983a, `Scientific Instruments’, in Corsi and Weindling, 1983, pp. 243–258. Turner G. L. E., 1983b, `Mathematical Instrument-Making in London in the Sixteenth Century’, in Tyacke, 1983, pp. 93–106.Google Scholar
  24. Tyacke S., ed., 1983, English Map-making 1500–1650,London: The British Library. Wallis-Tayler A.J., 1906, Refrigerating and Ice-Making Machinery,London. Voorhees G.T., 1909, Refrigerating Machines, Compression, Absorption,Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yorgos Goudaroulis
    • 1
  1. 1.Aristotle University of ThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations