Skip to main content

The Principal Source of our Mistakes, and the Means of Avoiding Them

  • Chapter

Abstract

I think it is beyond doubt that we are never mistaken except when we make judgments about things which we do not know well. Thus the main source of our mistakes comes only from the fact that we extend with temerity our power of judging beyond the limits of our knowledge, for if we restricted it carefully within its limits we would never run the risk of being mistaken. That is why I am surprised that Mr Gassendi could have denied that the will extends itself beyond the understanding, for he knew that by the ‘will’ we mean the power we have to determine ourselves, however we do so, either in judging or otherwise, and that by ‘understanding’ we mean the faculty simply for knowing and perceiving an object without any affirmation or negation.242 For we experience every day that we extend this faculty (the will) beyond the limits of the other (the understanding) each time we make a judgment about something that we do not know.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gassendi, Opera Omnia,vol. 2: Ethica,Bk. Ill, ch. 1, p. 824A.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The 2nd, 4th, 5th and 6th rules suggested by La Forge correspond to the four rules of Descartes’ Discourse on Method,AT VI, 18–19; CSM I, 120. The first rule is that proposed by Descartes in the Second Meditation, AT VII, 24; CSM II, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. Second Replies to Objections, AT VII, 147; CSM II, 105; Fifth Replies to Objections, AT VII, 352; CSM II, 244.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. Second Replies to Objections, AT IX-I, 205–6: CSM, II, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. Descartes to Elizabeth, 21 May 1643: AT III, 665; CSMK III, 218.

    Google Scholar 

  6. La Forge assumes, as was usually thought in the seventeenth century, that A. Amauld was the sole author of the Port-Royal Logic, published in Paris in 1662. In fact, l’Art de Penser was written by Arnauld and Pierre Nicole. See Logic or the Art of Thinking, ed. and trans. by J. V. Buroker (Cambridge University Press, 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Descartes to Elizabeth, 15 September, 1645: AT IV, 291–3; CSMK III, 265–6 (Lettres I, 27–32 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. The sixth and seventh rules are derived from Descartes’ Passions arts. 144–5; AT XI, 436–7; CSM I, 379–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De La Forge, L. (1997). The Principal Source of our Mistakes, and the Means of Avoiding Them. In: Treatise on the Human Mind (1664). International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idées, vol 153. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3590-2_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3590-2_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4929-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3590-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics