Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 17))

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to present a very versatile family of logical systems of positional or topological logic. These systems — obtained by generalizing the existing systems of chronological logic — are to have a very general nature, capable of reflecting the characteristics of a wide range of logical systems, including not only chronological (also temporal or tense) logic, but also what we may call locative or place logic, and even a logic of ‘possible worlds’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The proof of the interdeducibility of (R) and (RS) is as follows:

    Google Scholar 

  2. We shall write numerical parameter-values as subscripts.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Given the weaker thesiswe may now prove the stronger

    Google Scholar 

  4. See N. Rescher and J. Garson, `A Note on Chronological Logic’, Theoria 33 (1967) 39–44. The system which is shown equivalent to von Wright’s T-calculus is the chronological analogue of a topological system consisting of (PI), (P2), (P4), and (P5.2); a system which may be designated as PoII, i.e., PII minus axiom (P3).

    Google Scholar 

  5. The converse of (A3.2): p Rn (p) isovable for n =0 in P2 and the two theses: p = Rn(p) and (A4): (Vt) Re(p) p are interdeducible in these systems.

    Google Scholar 

  6. This observation is based on an idea developed by Alan Rose in his paper, `Eight Valued Geometry’ in the Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 3 (1952) 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  7. We assume that each system is such that for every formula either it or its negation is true in that system. This guarantees that ’’P (p) P (gyp).

    Google Scholar 

  8. We wish to thank Professor Nuel D. Belnap, Jr. for assistance in establishing this fact. (For the modal systems now at issue see p. 285 below.)

    Google Scholar 

  9. It could even be assumed that x y is not defined everywhere; otherwise the special stipulation laid down in connection with S4, viz., (Ix) (dy) (3z) (x Q y = z),would become superfluous.

    Google Scholar 

  10. This chapter is an almost unrevised version of an article of the same title written collaboratively with James Garson and published in The Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1968 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rescher, N. (1968). Topological Logic. In: Topics in Philosophical Logic. Synthese Library, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3546-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3546-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8331-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3546-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics