Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 17))

Abstract

The object of chronological logic — ‘tense logic’ or ‘change logic’ as it has also been called by various authors — is to systematize reasoning with propositions that have a temporalized copula. Such propositions do not involve the timeless ‘is’ (or ‘are’) of the mathematicians’ ‘3 is a prime’, but rather envisage an explicitly temporal condition: ‘Bob is sitting’, ‘Robert was present’, ‘Mary will have been informed’. In this area, we have to do with statements involving ‘time talk’ in which some essential reference to the Before-After relationship or the Past-Present-Future relationship is at issue, and the ideas of succession change and constancy enter in. Chronological logic seeks to provide the linguistic and inferential apparatus for exact discourse and rigorous reasoning in this sphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography on Chronological Logic

  1. Anscombe, G. E. M. (1964) ‘Before and After’, The Philosophical Review 73 (1964) 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aqyist, Lennart (1966) “Next” and “Ought”: Alternative Foundations for von Wright’s Tense Logic with an Application to Deontic Logic’, Logique et Analyse 9 (1966) 231–251.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bull, R.A. (1965) ‘An Algebraic Study of Diodorean Modal Systems’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (1965) 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clifford, John E. (1966) ‘Tense Logic and the Logic of Change’, Logique et Analyse 9 (1966) 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cochiarella, Nino B. (1967a) ‘Modality Within Tense Logic’, Abstract in The Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (1966) 690–691.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cochiarella, Nino B(1967b) ‘A Completeness Theorem for Tense Logic’, Abstract in The Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (1966) 689–690.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gale, Richard(1968) The Language of Time (London, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garson, JamesSee Rescher and Garson (1967b).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Los, Jerzy(1951) ‘Podstawy analizy metodologicznej kanonow Milla’ [Foundations of the methodological analysis of Mill’s canons], Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska 2 (1947) 269301. Reviewed by Henry Hiz in The Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (1951) 58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luce, David R. (1966) ‘A Calculus of Before’, Theoria 32 (1966) 24–44. Moody, Ernest A.(1953) tTruth and Consequence in Medieval Logic (Amsterdam, 1953). [For the schoolmen’s treatment of the temporal ‘ampliation’ of the terms of categorical propositions using tensed operators for past, present, and future, see pp. 53–63.]

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prior, Arthur N.(1957) Time and Modality (Oxford, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  12. The Syntax of Time Distinctions’, Franciscan Studies 18

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prior, Arthur N(1958) 105–120. (1962a) ‘Tense-Logic and the Continuity of Time’, Studia Logica 13 (1962) 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Prior, Arthur N(1962b) ‘The Formalities of Omniscience’, Philosophy 37 (1962)114129.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prior, Arthur N(1966) ‘Postulates for Tense Logic’, American Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1966) 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prior, Arthur N(1967) Past, Present and Future (Oxford, 1967 ).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reichenbach, Hans(1947) Elements of Symbolic Logic (New York, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rescher, Nicholas(1963) t’Avicenna on the Logic of“Conditional” Propositions’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 4 (1963) 48–58. Reprinted in Studies in the History of Arabic Logic (Pittsburgh, 1963 ).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rescher, Nicholas(1966a) ‘On the Logic of Chronological Propositions’, Mind 75 (1966) 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rescher, Nicholas(1966b) tTemporal Modalities in Arabic Logic (Dordrecht, 1966). (1966c) The Logic of Commands (London, 1966 ).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rescher, Nicholas(1966d) ‘Temporally Conditioned Descriptions’, Ratio 8 (1966) 46–54. With John Robison.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rescher, Nicholas(1967a) t‘Truth and Necessity in Temporal Perspective’ in R. M. Gale (ed.), The Philosophy of Time (New York, 1967 ).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rescher, Nicholas(1967b) ‘A Note on Chronological Logic’, Theoria 33 (1967) 39–44. With James Garson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1968 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rescher, N. (1968). Chronological Logic. In: Topics in Philosophical Logic. Synthese Library, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3546-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3546-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8331-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3546-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics