Skip to main content

In Vitro Propagation of Gymnosperms

  • Chapter
Tissue Culture in Forestry

Part of the book series: Forestry Sciences ((FOSC,volume 5))

Abstract

Most gymnosperms are propagated sexually through seeds. With regard to genetic improvement of a species, sexual reproduction will preserve some of the mean traits of selected families. Vegetative propagation, on the other hand, is a procedure with the potential to maintain the best characteristics of selected individuals, and therefore often is the preferred method of propagation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ABO EL-NIL M, ZS WOCHOK 1978 Morphogenetic heterogeneity of cultured Douglas fir cotyledons and its correlation with seed weight. Proceedings of the 4th international congress of plant tissue and cell culture, University Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 515

    Google Scholar 

  2. AITKEN J, KJ REILLY 1978 Tissue culture of Radiata pine - Streamlining techniques for plantlet production. Proceedings of the 4th congress of plant tissue and cell culture, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 515

    Google Scholar 

  3. TALIB K, JG TORREY 1959 The aseptic culture of isolated buds of Pseudotsuga taxifolia. Plant Physiol 34: 630–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. BALL E 1950 Differentiation in a callus culture of Sequoia sempervirens. Growth 14: 295–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. BANERJEE SN, NW RADFORTH 1969 In vitro studies on the developing embryos of Pinus resinosa. Bot Mag 82: 329–340

    Google Scholar 

  6. BONGA JM 1977 Organogenesis in in vitro cultures of embryonic shoots of Abies balsamea (Balsam fir). In vitro 13: 41–48

    Google Scholar 

  7. BONGA JM 1978 Morphogenetic effects of CO2 in bud culture of conifers. Proceedings of the 4th international congress of plant tissue and cell culture, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 515

    Google Scholar 

  8. BORNMAN CH, E JANSSON 1980 Organogenesis in cultured Pinus sylvestris tissue. Z Pflanzenphysiol 96: 1–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. BOULAY M 1976 Recherches sur la prolifération du Douglas par culture in vitro. Ann Rech Sylvicoles. AFOCEL, Domaine de l’Etançon, 77370 Nangis, France, 84–145

    Google Scholar 

  10. BOULAY M 1979 Multiplication et clonage rapide du Sequoia sempervirens par la culture in vitro. Etudes et Recherches, AFOCEL, Domaine de l’Etançon, 77370 Nangis, France 12: 49–55

    Google Scholar 

  11. BOULAY M 1979 Propagation in vitro du Douglas par micropropagation de germination aseptique et culture de bourgeons dormants. Etudes et Recherches, AFOCEL, Domaine de l’Etançon 77370 Nangis, France, 12: 67–75

    Google Scholar 

  12. BOULAY M, A FRANCLET 1977 Recherches sur la propagation végétative du Douglas: Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco. Possibilités d’obtention de plants viables à partir de la culture in vitro de bourgeons de pieds-mères juvéniles. CR Acad Sci 284: 1405–1407

    Google Scholar 

  13. BOULAY M, C MELIN, D LAFFRAY 1974 Recherches préliminaires sur la culture in vitro de bourgeons de Douglas. Ann Rech Sylvicoles. AFOCEL, Domaine de l’Etançon, 7730 Nangis, France, 47–145

    Google Scholar 

  14. BROWN CL, HE SOMMER 1975 An atlas of Gymnosperms cultured in vitro: 1924–1974. Georgia Forest Research Council, Macon, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  15. CAMPBELL RA, DJ DURZAN 1975 Induction of multiple buds and needles in tissue cultures of Picea glauca. Can J Bot 53: 1652–1657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. CAMPBELL RA, DJ DURZAN 1976 Vegetative propagation of Picea glauca by tissue culture. Can J For Res 6: 240–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. CHALUPA V 1975 Induction of organogenesis in forest tree tissue cultures. Commun Inst For 9: 39–50

    Google Scholar 

  18. CHALUPA V 1977 Development of isolated Norway spruce and Douglas fir buds in vitro. Commun Inst For Cech 10: 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  19. CHALUPA V 1977 Organogenesis in Norway spruce and Douglas fir tissue cultures. Commun Inst For Cech 10: 79–87

    Google Scholar 

  20. CHALUPA V, DJ DURZAN 1973 Growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies) tissue and cell cultures. Commun Inst For Cech 8: 111–125

    Google Scholar 

  21. CHALUPA V, DJ DURZAN 1973 Growth and development of resting buds of conifers in vitro. Can J For Res 3: 196–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. CHEAH KT, TY CHENG 1978 Histological analysis of adventitious bud formation in cultured Douglas fir cotyledon. Am J Bot 65: 845–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. CHENG TY 1975 Adventitious bud formation in culture of Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Mirb.) Franco. Plant Sci Lett 5: 97–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. CHENG TY 1976 Vegetative propagation of western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) through tissue culture. Plant Cell Physiol 17: 1347–1350

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. CHENG TY 1977 Factors affecting adventitious bud formation of cotyledon culture of Douglas fir. Plant Sci Lett 9: 179–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. CHENG TY, TH VOQUI 1977 Regeneration of Douglas fir plantlets through tissue culture. Science 198: 306–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. COLEMAN W, TA THORPE 1976 Induction of buds in tissue cultures of four different conifers. Plant Physiol Supp 57: 67

    Google Scholar 

  28. COLEMAN W, TA THORPE 1977 In vitro culture of western red cedar (Thuja plicata Donn.). I. Plantlet formation. Bot Gaz 138: 298–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. DAVID A 1972 Effets de diverses solutions minérales sur la prolifératon de: tissus de Pin maritime en culture in vitro CR Acad Sc 275: 2857–2860

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. DAVID A 1979 Manifestations de diverses potentialités organogènes et micro propagation végétative chez le Pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Sol.). Ann Recl Sylvicoles, AFOCEL, Domaine de 1’Etançon, 77370 Nangis, France, 57–75

    Google Scholar 

  31. DAVID A, H DAVID 1977 Manifestations de diverses potentialités organogènes d’organes ou de fragments d’organes de Pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Sol.) en culture in vitro. CR Acad Sc 284: 627–630

    Google Scholar 

  32. DAVID H, K ISEMUKALI, A DAVID 1978 Obtention de plants de Pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Sol.) à partir de brachyblastes ou d’apex caulinaires de très jeunes sujets cultivés in vitro. CR Acad Sc 287: 245–248

    Google Scholar 

  33. DAVID A, MJ THOMAS 1979 Organogenèse et multiplication végétative in vitro chez les Gymnospermes. L’année Biol 18: 381–416

    Google Scholar 

  34. DURZAN DJ 1979 Progress and Promise in forest genetics. Proceedings of the 50th anniversary conference, “Paper Science and Technology–the Cutting Edge”, Appleton, Wisconsin, The Institute of Paper chemistry, 31–60

    Google Scholar 

  35. FRANCLET A 1979 Rajeunissement des arbres adultes en vue de leur propagation végétative. Etudes et Recherches. AFOCEL, Domaine de l’Etançon, 77370 Nangis, France, 12: 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  36. FRANCLET A, A DAVID, H DAVID, M BOULAY 1980 Première mise en évidence morphologique d’un rajeunissement de méristèmes primaires caulinaires de Pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Sol.). CR Acad Sc 290: 927–929

    Google Scholar 

  37. FRIDBORG G, M PEDERSEN, L LANDSTROM, T ERIKSSON 1978 The effect of activated charcoal on tissue cultures: adsorption of metabolites inhibiting morphogenesis. Physiol plant 43: 104–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. GAUTHERET RJ 1959 La culture des tissus végétaux. Techniques et réalisations, Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  39. HAISSIG BE 1974 Influences of auxins and auxin synergists on adventitious root primordium initiation and development. NZ J FOR SCI 4: 311–323

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. HASEGAWA PM, T YASUDA, TY CHENG 1979 Effect of auxin and cytokinin on newl; synthesized proteins of cultured Douglas fir cotyledons. Physiol Plant 46; 211–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. ISEMUKALI K 1979 Manifestation de diverses potentialités organogènes et Micropropagation végétative chez le Pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Sol). Thèse de Doctorat de 3e cycle, Laboratoire de Physiologie Végétale, Université de Bordeaux I, 33405 Talence, France

    Google Scholar 

  42. ISIKAWA H 1974 In vitro formation of adventitious buds and roots on the hypocotyl of Cryptomeria japonica. Bot Mag 87: 73–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. JACQUIOT C 1955 Sur le rôle des corrélations d’inhibition dans les phénomènes d’organogenèse observés chez le tissu cambial, cultivé in vitro, de certains arbres. Incidence sur les problèmes du bouturage. CR Acad Sc 241: 1064–1066

    Google Scholar 

  44. JANSSON E, C BORNMAN 1980 In vitro phyllomorphic regeneration of shoot buds and shoots in Picea abies. Physiol Plant 49: 105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. JOHNSON MA, JA CARLSON 1977 Attempts to induce embryogenesis in conifer suspension culture: Biochemical aspects. Tappi, Inst. Paper chemistry, Appleton, Wisconsin, 25–29

    Google Scholar 

  46. KADKADE PG, H JOPSON 1978 Influence of light quality on organogenesis from the embryo-derived callus of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Plant Sci Lett 13: 67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. KONAR RN 1975 In vitro studies of Pinus. II. The growth and morphogenesis of cell cultures from Pinus gerardiana. Phytomorphology 25: 55–59

    Google Scholar 

  48. KONAR RN, YP OBEROI 1965 In vitro development of embryoids on the cotyledons of Biota orientalis. Phytomorphology 15: 137–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. KONAR RN, MH SINGH 1980 Induction of shoot buds from tissue cultures of Pinus wallichiana. Z Pflanzenphysiol 99: 173–177

    Google Scholar 

  50. LA RUE CD 1948 Regeneration in the megagametophyte of Zamia floridana. Bull Torrey Bot Club 75: 597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. LUTZ A 1969 Etude des aptitudes morphogénétiques des cultures de tissue. Analyse par la méthode des clones d’origine unicellulaire. Rev Gen Bot 76: 309–359

    Google Scholar 

  52. MAHESHWARI R, C SHAILINI, K VELUTHAMBI, S MAHADEVAN 1980 Interaction of gibberellic acid and indol-3-acetic acid in the growth of excised cuscuta shoot tips in vitro. Plant Physiol 65: 186–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. MARTIN C, M CARRE, G DUC 1979 Note sur les cultures de tissus de févérole (Vicia faba L.); bouturage, culture de cals, culture de méristèmes. Ann Amélior Plantes 29: 277–287

    Google Scholar 

  54. MINOCHA SC 1980 Callus and adventitious shoot formation in excised embryos of white pine (Pinus strobus). Can J Bot 58: 366–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. NITSCH JP, C NITSCH 1970 Obtention de plantes haploides à partir de pollen. Bull Soc Bot Fr 117: 339–360

    Google Scholar 

  56. NORREL B, JP NITSCH 1968 La formation d’ embryons végétatifs“ chez Daucus carota L. Bull Soc Bot Fr 115: 501–514

    Google Scholar 

  57. NORSTOG K 1965 Induction of apogamy in megagametophytes of Zamia integrifolia. Am J Bot 52: 993–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. NORSTOG K, E RHAMSTINE 1967 Isolation and culture of haploid and diploid cycad tissues. Phytomorphology 17: 374–381

    Google Scholar 

  59. RAMAWAT KG, HC ARYA 1976 Growth and morphogenesis in callus cultures of Ephedra gerardiana. Phytomorphology. 26: 395–403

    Google Scholar 

  60. RANCILLAC M 1979 Mise au point d’une méthode de multiplication végétative in vitro du Pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Sol.) pour la constitution de clones à partir de semences. Etudes et recherches, AFOCEL, Domaine de l’Etançon, 77370 Nangis, France, 12: 41–48

    Google Scholar 

  61. RANCILLAC M 1981 Perspectives d’application des cultures d’organes in vitro A la multiplication végétative du Pin maritime, Pinus pinaster Sol. Ann Sci For 38: 55–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. REILLY K, CL BROWN 1976 In vitro studies of bud and shoot formation in Pinus radiata and Pseudotsuga menziesii. Ga For Res Pap 86: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  63. REILLY K, J WASHER 1977 Vegetative propagation of radiata pine by tissue culture. Plantlet formation from embryonic tissue. NZ For Sci 7: 199

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. SMITH DR, TA Thorpe 1977 Root initiation in cuttings of Pinus radiata seedlings: effects of aromatic amino acids and simple phenyl propanoids. Bot Gaz 138: 434–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. SOMMER HE 1975 Differentiation of adventitious buds on Douglas fir embryos in vitro. Proc Int Plant Prop Soc 25: 125–127

    Google Scholar 

  66. SOMMER HE, CL BROWN 1974 Plantlet formation in pine tissue cultures. Am J Bot Supp 61: 11

    Google Scholar 

  67. SOMMER HE, CL BROWN, PP Kormanik 1975 Differentiation of plantlets in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) tissue cultured in vitro. Bot Gaz 136: 196–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. THOMAS MJ, E DUHOUX, J VAZART 1977 In vitro organ initiation in tissue cultures of Biota orientalis and other species of the Cupressaceae. Plant Sci Lett 8: 395–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. TRANVAN H 1979 In vitro adventitious bud formation on isolated seedlings of Pinus silvestris L. Biol Plant 21: 230–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. VAZART J, M DA CONCEICAO, MJ THOMAS 1979 Structure anatomique et cytologique de l’hypocotyle du Biota orientalis L. au stade de l’étalement des cotylédons. Rev Cytol Biol Végét 2: 83–96

    Google Scholar 

  71. VON ARNOLD S, T ERIKSSON 1978 Induction of adventitious buds on embryos of Norway spruce grown in vitro. Physiol Plant 44: 283–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. VON ARNOLD S, T ERIKSSON 1979 Induction of adventitious buds on buds of Norway spruce (Picea abies) grown in vitro. Physiol Plant 45: 29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. VON ARNOLD S, T ERIKSSON 1979 Bud induction on isolated needles of Norway spruce (Picea abies) grown in vitro. Plant Sci Lett 15: 363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. WEATHERHEAD MA, J BURDON, GG HENSHAW 1978 Some effects of activated charcoal as an additive to plant tissue culture media. Z Pflanzenphysiol 89: 141–147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. WEATHERHEAD MA, J BURDON, GG HENSHAW 1979 Effects of activated charcoal as an additive to plant tissue culture media: Part 2. Z Pflanzenphysiol 94: 399–405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. WEBB KJ, HE STREET 1977 Morphogenesis in vitro of Pinus and Picea. Acta Hortic 78: 259–269

    Google Scholar 

  77. WINTON LL, SA VERHAGEN 1977 Shoots from Douglas fir cultures. Can J Bot 55: 1246–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. WINTON LL, S VERHAGEN 1977 Embryoids in suspension cultures of Douglas fir and Loblolly pine. Tappi, Paper Chemistry, Appleton, Wisconsin. 21–24

    Google Scholar 

  79. WOCHOK ZS, M ABO El-NIL 1977 Conifer tissue culture. Proc Int Plant Prop Soc 27: 131–135

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

David, A. (1982). In Vitro Propagation of Gymnosperms. In: Bonga, J.M., Durzan, D.J. (eds) Tissue Culture in Forestry. Forestry Sciences, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3538-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3538-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8272-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3538-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics