Skip to main content

Higher-Order Linguistic Influences on Development of Orthographic Knowledge: Illustrations from Spelling Problems in Dutch and Assessment Tools

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Neuropsychology and Cognition ((NPCO,volume 8))

Abstract

Alphabetic writing systems vary considerably as to their use of higher-order linguistic principles at the morphological and syntactic levels in spelling. This use of higher-order principles adds to the complexity of the orthography, which is not just related to phonology. As discussed in this chapter, Dutch orthography is characterized most distinctly by its specific use of analogy rules in polymorphemic words. The analysis that we will present here further elaborates and extends the work reported in empirical studies published by Verhoeven (1979), Assink (1987a), and Assink, Van der Linden, and Kattenberg (1990). The first study is central for sections 2–3, while the other studies form the basis of sections 4–9.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Assink, E.M.H. (1987a). De rol van grammaticale operaties bij het nemen van orthografische beslissingen. [The role of grammatical operations in orthographic decisions]. In Spektator, pp. 180–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assink. E.M.H. (1987b). Algorithms in spelling instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1987, 79, No. 3, 228–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assink, E.M.H., Van der Linden, J., and Kattenberg, G.P.A. (1990). Syntactische intuïties bij kinderen. [Syntactic intuitions in children.] Tijdschrift voor Ontwikkelingspsychologie, 17, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., and Abbott, R. (1994). Multiple orthographic and phonological codes in literacy acquisition: An evolving research program. In V.W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge 1: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 277–317 ). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M. (1982). Starting to talk worse: Clues to language acquisition from children’s late speech errors. In S. Strauss (Ed.), U-shaped behavioral growth. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M. (1985). Beyond communicative adequacy: From piecemeal knowledge to in integrated system in the child’s acquisition of language. In K.E. Nelson (Ed.), Children’s language. Vol. 5. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J.A. (1986a). Syntactic awareness and verbal performance in relation to reading skill and ongoing reading comprehension monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 282–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J.A. (1986b). Syntactic Awareness and Verbal Performance from Preschool to Fifth Grade. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brus, B.Th. and Voeten, M. (1972). Eén minuut test [One-minute test]. Nijmegen: Berkhout.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P.E. and Bradley, L. (1983). Why children sometimes write words they do not read. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in spelling. London, etc.: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L.C. and Wilce, L.S. (1979). Does word training increase or decrease interference on a Stroop task? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 252–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L.C. and Wilce, L.S. (1983). Development of word identification speed in skilled and less skilled beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F.W., Shankweiler, D. and Liberman, I.Y. (1985). Spelling proficiency and sensitivity to word structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. and Winner, E. (1982). First intimations of artistry. In S. Straus (Ed.), U-shaped behavioral growth. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombert, J.E. (1992). Metalinguistic Developent. New York, etc.: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, A. (1981). Standaardtaal en dialectsprekende kinderen [Standard language and dialect speaking children]. Muiderberg: Coutinho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, A. (1985). De relatie tussen spelvaardigheid en dialect [The relation between spelling ability and dialect]. In E.M.H. Assink and G. Verhoeven (Eds.), Visies op spelling (pp. 164–172 ). Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. and Chard, J. (1980). The reader’s implicit knowledge of orthographic structure. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in Spelling. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L, and Chard, J. (1983). The reader’s implicit knowledge of orthographic structure. In U., Frith, (Ed.), Cognitive Processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1985). Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1987). Function and process in comparing language and cognition. In M. Hickmann (Ed.), Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, E.S. (1972). How alphabets might reflect language. In J.F. Kavanagh and I. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by Ear and by Eye. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schadler, M. and Thissen, D.M. (1981). The development of automatic word recognition and reading skill. Memory and Cognition, 9, 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M.S. andMcClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R., Strauss, S., Orpaz, N., and Carmi, G. U-shaped behavioral growth in ratio comparisons. In S. Straus (Ed.), U-shaped behavioral growth. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, S. (1982). Introduction. In S. Straus (Ed.), U-shaped behavioral growth. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. and Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1985). Are there qualitative differences in reading behavior between dyslexics and normal readers? Memory and Cognition, 13, 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunmer, W.E., Nesdale, A.R. and Wright, A.D. (1987). Syntactic awareness and reading acquisition. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Heuven, V., (1980). Aspects of Dutch orthography and reading. In J.F. Kavanagh and R.L. Venezky (Eds.), Orthography, reading and dyslexia (pp. 57–73 ). Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F.R. and Scanlon, D.M. (1982). Verbal processing in poor and normal readers. In C.J. Brainerd and M. Pressley (Eds.), Verbal Processes in Children: Progress in Cognitive Development Research. New York, etc.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, G., (1979). Verbeelding en werkelijkheid, Spelfouten in de opstellen uit verschillende typen van onderwijs. [Facts and fancies, spelling errors encountered in essays collected in various types of education]. In Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 1, pp. 146–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Loveridge, J.M. (1985). Use of orthographic structure and reading ability: What develops? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Assink, E.M.H., Kattenberg, G. (1994). Higher-Order Linguistic Influences on Development of Orthographic Knowledge: Illustrations from Spelling Problems in Dutch and Assessment Tools. In: Berninger, V.W. (eds) The Varieties of Orthographic Knowledge. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3492-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3492-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4460-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3492-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics