Skip to main content

Ludwig von Mises as Social Rationalist

  • Chapter
The Review of Austrian Economics

Abstract

For the most part Ludwig von Mises’s writings on society and social evolution have been ignored by the participants in the current revivals of both Austrian economics and classical liberal political philosophy. When his social theory has been addressed, Mises appears to his critics (Barry 1987, p. 59) as “a child of the Enlightenment wrongly deposited in the twentieth century.” But this assessment is inaccurate for two reasons. First, Mises severely criticizes the social meliorism of the Enlightenment liberals and demonstrates that their position is inconsistent with one that assigns the central position to human reason in social evolution. Second, in developing his own uniquely rationalist position, Mises has much to say about matters of central importance to modern Austrians, libertarians, and classical liberals who are either critics or adherents of the “spontaneous order” and/or social evolutionist positions staked out by Hayek.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barry, Norman P. On Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Eamonn. Ludwig von Mises: Fountainhead of the Modern Microeconomics Revolution. Brookfield, Vt.: Gower Publishing, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, Israel M. “The Economic Calculation Debate: Lessons for Austrians.” The Review of Austrian Economics 2 (1988): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, Don. Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von. Omnipotent Government: The Rise of the Total State and Total War. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. 3rd ed. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von. Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis. Trans. J. Kahane. 2nd ed. London: Jonathan Cape Ltd., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von. Liberalism: A Socio-Economic Exposition. Trans. Ralph Raico. 2nd ed. Kansas City, Kans.: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1978a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von. The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science: An Essay on Method. 2nd ed. Kansas City, Kans.: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1978b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von. Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution. Auburn University, Ala.: The Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salerno, J.T. (1990). Ludwig von Mises as Social Rationalist. In: Rothbard, M.N., Block, W. (eds) The Review of Austrian Economics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3454-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3454-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-3456-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3454-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics