Abstract
Contemporary students of the social sciences are well-acquainted with two claims about the role of quantitative techniques in those fields. One is that quantification is essential for an objective and rigorous investigation of the social no less than the ‘natural’ domain; another is that no description of a social world or an aspect of one can be complete without some qualitative appreciation of relevant properties of the territory. Our purpose here is not to rehearse the several arguments and accounts that could be given in support of or in opposition to one or the other of these not incompatible claims, but rather to show how their familiarity tends to conceal a vast array of presuppositions that can be felicitously displayed through an historical and philosophical analysis of their content.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baker, Keith Michael, Condorcet. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.
Baker, Keith Michael, ‘The Early History of the Term ‘Social Science’,’ in Annals of Science, 20, 1964.
Barton, Allen H. and Paul F. Lazarsfeld, ‘Quantitative Measurement in the Social Sciences,’ in The Policy Sciences, eds. Daniel Lemer and Harold D. Lasswell. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1951.
Braybrooke, David, Philosophy of Social Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.
Brodbeck, May, ed., Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. New York: MacMillan, 1968.
Cantore, Enrico, Scientific Man. New York: ISH Publishers, 1977.
Condorcet, Marquis de, Condorcet: Selected Writings,ed. Keith Michael Baker. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1976. Freud, Sigmund, The Question of Lay Analysis,’ Standard Edition.
Kaplan, Abraham, ‘Measurement in Behavioral Sciences,’ in Readings in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, ed. May Brodbeck. New York: MacMillan, 1968.
Kiernan, Colm, The Enlightenment and Science in Eighteenth Century France. Geneva, Switzerland: Institut et Musée Voltaire, 1968. Second Edition, Banbury, Oxfordshire: Cheney and Sons, 1973.
Nagel, Ernest, ‘Measurement,’ in Philosophy of Science, eds., Arthur Danto and Sidney Morgenbesser. Cleveland: Meridian, 1967.
Plato, Republic, trans. F. M. Comford. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.
Reason, David, ‘Mathematical Models and Understanding Social Life,’ unpublished paper, University of Kent at Canterbury, n.d.
Reid, Thomas, The Works. Edinburgh: Maclachlan, Steward and Company, 1849.
Roszak, Theodore, The Making of a Counter Culture. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1969.
Sampson, R. V., Progress in the Age of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1956.
Smith, Robert B., An Introduction to Social Research. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1983.
Spradley, James, The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1979.
Sylvan, David and Barry Glassner, A Rationalist Methodology for the Social Sciences. London and New York: Basil Blackwell, 1985.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glassner, B., Moreno, J.D. (1989). Introduction: Quantification and Enlightenment. In: Glassner, B., Moreno, J.D. (eds) The Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction in the Social Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 112. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3444-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3444-8_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8460-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3444-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive