Skip to main content

The Inadequacy of Role Models for Educating Medical Students in Ethics with Some Reflections on Virtue Theory

  • Chapter
The Influence of Edmund D. Pellegrino’s Philosophy of Medicine

Abstract

Persons concerned with medical education sometimes argued that medical students need no formal education in ethics. They contended that if admissions were restricted to persons of good character and those students were exposed to good role models, the ethics of medicine would take care of itself. However, no one seems to give much philosophic attention to the ideas of model or role model. In this essay, I undertake such an analysis and add an analysis of role. I show the weakness in relying on role models exclusively and draw implications from these for appeals to virtue theory. Furthermore, I indicate some of the problems about how virtue theory is invoked as the ethical theory that would most closely be associated to the role model rhetoric and consider some of the problems with virtue theory. Although Socrates was interested in the character of the (young) persons with whom he spoke, Socratic education is much more than what role modeling and virtue theory endorse. It — that is, philosophy — is invaluable for ethics education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Machiavelli N. The Prince. New York: P. F. Collier & Son Corp., 1910, 1938: 19.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pellegrino ED. Humanism and the Physician. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press, 1979: 15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Uhlman M, Ditzen LS, FitzGerald S. U.S. assess Penn doctors $30 million. Philadelphia Inquirer December 13, 1995: Al. The lead under the headline was “Abuse of Medicare billings amounted to some $10 million, investigators said. Fines come to $20 million. Further scrutiny of teaching hospitals is planned.” Issues included billing for care that residents had provided as though an attending physician had and up-coding from what was provided to a category of care that gets greater payment. Penn consented to pay the $30 million without accepting guilt.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen ES. The Penn doctors sent an immoral message. Philadelphia Inquirer. December 16, 1995: A17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zuckerman H. The role of the role model: The other side of sociological change. In: O’Gorman HJ, ed. Surveying Social Life: Papers in Honor of Herbert H. Hyman. Middletown CT: Wesleyan University Press: 137ff, notes that social obligations attach to being a role model.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Pellegrino ED. The reconciliation of technology and humanism: A Flexnerian task 75 years later. In: Vevier C, ed. Flexner: 75 Years Later. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1987: 77–111.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pellegrino, 1979, especially chapter 10. Pellegrino has been a great champion of the humanities in both senses of the term. And he has had marked success measured by their presence in curricula. Despite this, he has doubted their security relatively late in their infiltration. Pellegrino ED. Can ethics be taught? An essay. Mt Sinai J Med. 1989; 56: 490–494.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC. The Virtues in Medical Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993: 179.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid: 177.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid: 176.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R]ole models are treated in the literature as having a variety of functions; they serve as aspiration levels, as living evidence that certain achievements are possible and as models for emulation in achieving and maintaining certain social positions.“ Zuckerman, 1988: 124.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quoted in Light D. Becoming Psychiatrists. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1980: 21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. White RB. Ethics training needed in medical schools. Am Med News Sept. 25, 1981: 5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McGee FW. Teaching medical ethics (letter to the editor). JAMA 1979; 241: 27.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eichna LW. Medical-school education, 1975–1979: a student’s perspective. N Engl J Med 1980; 303: 727–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. See the report of the Subcommittee on Evaluation of Humanistic Qualities in the Internist, American Board of Internal Medicine. Evaluation of humanistic qualities in the internist. Ann Intern Med 1983; 99: 720–724. “Medical faculties have grown larger and training programs more complex, leading to less personalized faculty contact with residents, difficulty in identification of role-models and a loss of `family’ within a residency program” (quotation: 721).

    Google Scholar 

  17. The lack of a clear, univocal account of “role-models” in medicine fits the wider picture. “ [R]ole model’ has been applied in a blanket fashionchwr(133) to anyone who becomes a subject of emulation, as a reference point for norms and for comparison.” Zuckerman, 1988: 124. We also lack an historical grasp of appeals to role-modeling — where, when, how and why people begin to invoke it, and how the appeals have evolved. Zuckerman, 1988, puts the roots of the idea in Hymen’s 1942 doctoral dissertation about reference groups (I guess she did not know about Machiavelli). She also notes that the phrase “reference idol” coined in 1948 was a weak precursor (p. 127) and argues that although the concept prè-dated the term, once it was introduced it “helped to the reconstruct social reality” (p. 142). The Oxford English Dictionary cites a 1957 remark of Wagner Thielens’s about medical students as its first example of the term “role-model” (2nd edition, 1989, vol XIV: 43). The second example, from 1977, denied that parents thought of teachers as role-models. Zuckerman, responding to the O.E.D.’s first edition, notes uses contemporaneous with Thielens’s, the phrasing of which suggest he did not coin the term (p. 123). She also notes the term’s extensive application to women due to their rapid access to new roles. I recall becoming aware of it through friends who were early (1960s) feminists.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goodman N. The Languages of Art. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill, 1968: 171.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hesse M. Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zuckerman, 1988: 129.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ladd J. Morality and the ideal of rationality in formal organizations. The Monist 1970: 448–516. Also see Zuckerman, 1988: 124.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pellegrino and Thomasma, 1993, claim that their book is about professional virtues and not personal ones. I am not sure this can succeed; for example, their comments about integrity seem in tension with such splitting.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Professing is a keystone of professionalism in Pellegrino ED and Thomasma DC. A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Social contract is a fundamental moral notion for some highly influential theorists in medical ethics. See Veatch RM. A Theory of Medical Ethics. New York: Basic Books, 1981 and Engelhardt HT. The Foundations of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986. Engelhardt’s approach includes contrasting the rival entries into a social contract like John Rawls’ and Robert Nozick’s.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bowie N. `Role’ as moral concept in health care. J Med Philos 1982; 7: 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Alderman H. By virtue of a virtue. Review of Metaphysics 1982; 36: 127–153.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Indeed, Pellegrino and Thomasma suggest that the content of the role physician is fragmented and may approach incoherence because it now includes being a “businessperson, scientist, proletarian, corporate executive,” 1993: 35.

    Google Scholar 

  28. May W. The Physician’s Covenant. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Zuckerman, 1988: 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zuckerman denies that this possible because the neophyte will influence the model! Ibid: 142.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Although this might help students become autonomous, when they call for role-models, they are sometimes wooing intimacy or personal disclosure. Blythe M. Student definitions of role models. Am J Psychiatry 1982; 139: 703.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zuckerman, 1988: 129. Performance prototypes and mobility prototypes may not come as separate beings (131).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Issues about virtue, ethics, duties, etc., which also arise in research, are closely related to those of medicine. This is because of the basic sciences’ propinquity to clinical sites, researchers’ role in medical education and the fact that many clinical teachers do research. Apart from the well known issues surrounding the use of human subjects, researchers have ethical problems about writing for publication and for grant submission. These problems can, in part, be seen to be a consequence of the demise of colleague relations (role-models?) and the rise of the citation index culminating in a community based on paper contact rather than human contact. Renkin BA. Ethics and publication: the journal as mentor. CBE Views 1979; 2: 2–7. The internal goods (intrinsic rewards) of science include asking clear questions, designing and executing good experiments and publishing interesting results. They are compromised by grantsmanship, promotion, tenure, and peer esteem - which lead to misconduct. For example, scientists sometimes write their “Materials and Methods” sections of journal articles obscurely with the deliberate intention of diminishing repeatability and inhibiting further progress on the part of competitors. Jones AH. A question of ethics: materials and methods. Proceedings of the 27th International Technical Communication conference II: W85 - W87.

    Google Scholar 

  35. MacIntyre A. After Virtue. Notre Dame. University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  36. MacIntyre A. Patients as agents. In: Spicker SF, Engelhardt HT, eds. Philosophical Medical Ethics: Its nature and Significance Dordrecht: D. Reidel Pub. Co., 1977: 197–212.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. In: McKeon R, ed. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York Random House, 1941. (For the quotation see Bekker pagination: 1115b5–1105b12.). My italics.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pellegrino and Thomasma, 1993, reject the balance metaphor (Aristotle’s language involves “a mean between extremes”). They consider it the greatest weakness of Aristotle’s ethics because it is vague and inapplicable to certain virtues (see 6). But I believe that they resort to much the same type of move themselves. For example, they contend that a balance must be found between virtue ethics and rule-based ethics (19), or, again, between the place of affect and cognition in moral life (28). Perhaps making the mean relative to the self was a greater fault, but Aristotle was concerned to give an account of happiness in the Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  39. MacIntyre A, 1981: 26.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pellegrino and Thomasma, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pellegrino and Thomasma, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  42. This is utterly consistent with Aristotle’s notion that excellent moral character is not radically distinguishable from intellectual understanding.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pellegrino and Thomasma, 1993, e.g.: 41.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zuckerman, 1988: 130, 137–139.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid: 137, 139ff.

    Google Scholar 

  46. The problems with sameness are reminscent of some problems that commanded the attention of the later Wittgenstein - issues involving private language and private meaning. However, those involving role-modeling need not be thought of as a pure logical conundrum, which if anyone were really puzzled by, we would find them crazy. See Kripke S. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  47. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to Forego Life Sustaining Treatment. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982: 210.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Contrast these positions with that of Pellegrino and Thomasma, 1993. They insist on reasoning being a key element in being moral. See 15, 18, and 20–29, especially 21.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hoffman S. Introduction to ethical medicine: A student examines life on the wards. The Harvard Medical Alumni Bulletin. 1981; 55: 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gerber LA. The search for clinical role-models as a way of coping with clerkship stress. J Med Educ 1979; 54: 659–661. “The criteria for choosing role models is not well understood” Zuckerman, 1988: 128.

    Google Scholar 

  51. See Pellegrino and Thomasma, 1993: 176, where they mention learning ethics by practice. One of the best examples of this “more” is Buckman, RM. How To Break Bad News: A Guide for Health Care Professionals. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gerber LA, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Engel GL. The Clinical Application of the Biopsychosocial Model. J Med Philos 1981; 6: 101–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. I here modify and apply an argument from Harmon G. Human flourishing, ethics and liberty. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1983; 12: 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Veatch RM. Against virtue: a deontological critique of virtue theory in medical ethics. In: Shelp EE, ed. Virtue and Medicine. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Co, 1985. Pellegrino and Thomasma take Veatch on in 1993, chapter I. See also chapter 13.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Churchill L. Ethos and ethics in medical education. NC Med J 1975; 36: 31–33. (Quote: 31).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bok D. Needed: A new way to train doctors. Harvard Magazine May-June 1984: 32–71.

    Google Scholar 

  58. The GPEP Report.“Physicians for the Twenty First Century Association of American Medical Colleges. Washington: D.C., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  59. There are important problems in teaching ethics solely via cases. See Kopelman LM. Case method and casuistry: the problem of bias. Theor Med 1994; 15: 5–20. Apparently didactics can work when coordinated with case discussion. Siegler M, Rezley AG, Connell KJ. Using simulated case studies to evaluate a clinical ethics course for junior students. J Med Educ 1982; 57: 380–385, and Pellegrino ED, et al. Relevance and utility of courses in medical ethics. JAMA 1985; 253: 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Chapman CB. Ethics, law and role models. Neurosurgery 1981; 9: 497–500.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Culver C et al. Basic curricular goals in medical ethics. N Engl J Med 1984; 312: 253–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. I would like to thank Dr. Marge Wilkinson for advice on an early draft of this paper.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erde, E.L. (1997). The Inadequacy of Role Models for Educating Medical Students in Ethics with Some Reflections on Virtue Theory. In: Thomasma, D.C. (eds) The Influence of Edmund D. Pellegrino’s Philosophy of Medicine. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3364-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3364-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4796-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3364-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics