Abstract
I am very grateful to Quentin Smith and Michael Tooley for their very thoughtful comments on my paper. They raise many issues, and I shall only attempt to address some of them here, and augment my original argument at one or two points. First, it may be helpful if I clarify the strategy of my paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Oaklander, L. N. (1999), “Review of Time, Tense, and Causation by Michael Tooley, ” in Mind 108: 407–413.
Tooley, M. (1997), Time, Tense, and Causation ( Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Le Poidevin, R. (2001). Reply to Smith and Tooley. In: Oaklander, L.N. (eds) The Importance of Time. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 87. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3362-5_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3362-5_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5841-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3362-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive