Abstract
On first inspection, there would appear to be a close connection between the thesis of indeterminism and the belief that, while the past and present are real, the future is not real.1 The claim that the future is indeterminate sits nicely with the claim that the state of the world at the present time (together with the laws of nature) does not determine what the state of the world will be at a later time. This intuitively plausible connection between indeterminism and a dynamic view of the world has been suggested by a number of philosophers, some of whom believed that indeterminism is both a necessary and a sufficient condition for the world to be a dynamic one. Hans Reichenbach is widely taken to have defended this position, and a number of authors — including Michael Tooley (1997; § 1.4), Richard Healey (1981; § 3) and Adolf Grünbaum (1963; § ch. 10) — have criticised Reichenbach for this view. In this paper, I will argue that each of these critics has, in one way or another, seriously misrepresented Reichenbach’s views, and that their criticisms are therefore almost entirely misdirected.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Grünbaum, A. (1963), Philosophical Problems of Space and Time ( New York: Alfred A. Knopf).
Healey, R. (1981), “Statistical Theories, Quantum Mechanics, and the Directedness of Time,” in Healey (ed.), Reduction, Time and Reality ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press )
McCall, S. (1976), “Objective Time Flow,” Philosophy of Science 43: 337–362.
Reichenbach, H. (1925), “The Causal Structure of the World and the Difference Between Past and Future,” trans. in Reichenbach (1978): 81–119.
Reichenbach, H. (1938), Experience and Prediction ( Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press )
Reichenbach, H. (1947), Elements of Symbolic Logic ( London: Macmillan).
Reichenbach, H. (1952), “Les Fondements Logiques de la Mécanique des Quanta,” trans. As “The Logical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics” in Reichenbach ( 1978 ): 237–278
Reichenbach, H. (1956), The Direction of Time ( Los Angeles: University of California Press).
Reichenbach, H. (1978), Selected Writings, 1909–1953 ( Dordrecht: Reidel ).
Tooley, M. (1997), Time, Tense, and Causation ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martel, I. (2001). Reichenbach on Indeterminism and Becoming. In: Oaklander, L.N. (eds) The Importance of Time. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 87. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3362-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3362-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5841-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3362-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive