Abstract
In Chapters 2 and 3 we recognized the need for a consistent definition of the strain-fields which may be constrained in the physical regime being simulated, e.g. a thin Timoshenko beam or a thin and deep curved arch undergoing inextensional bending. We also saw that in the cases examined so far, the consistency requirement could be met by using an ‘assumed strain’ approach, i.e. by using a strain interpolation that is derived from the originally constituted strain interpolation (using the strain gradient operators on the displacement interpolations) through an orthogonality condition that assures variational correctness. It was also useful to remember that in the cases examined so far, the mapping from the covariant natural coordinate system (in which the interpolating functions are defined) to the Cartesian system (in which the strains and stresses are derived and the energy functional is evaluated) was a linear one. In such a case, the representation of the Cartesian strains in a consistent form was an easy task once the shape functions and derivatives of these in the covariant system was consistently matched. This was also automatically achieved quite often by the use of simple reduced integration rules. However, difficulties loomed large when such a simple approach was extrapolated to quadrilateral plate and shell elements and general curved beam and shell elements, i.e. curved in Cartesian space. Simple reduced integration strategies failed when distortions from rectangular geometries became large. At this stage, it was found that an ‘assumed covariant base’ approach was effective [4.1–4.4] although no reasons were adduced as to why this step was necessary. In this chapter, we shall investigate the basis for such methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
E. N. Dvorkin and K. J. Bathe, “A continuum mechanics based four-node shell element for general nonlinear analysis,” Eng. Comp., Vol. 1, 1984, pp. 77–88.
K. J. Bathe and E. N. Dvorkin, “A four node platebending element based on Mindlin/Reissner plate theory and a mixed interpolation,” Int. J. Numer. Meths. Engrg., Vol. 21, 1985,pp. 367–383.
K. J. Bathe and E. N. Dvorkin, “A formulation of general shell elements–use of the mixed interpolation of tensorial components,” Int. J. Numer. Meths. Engrg., Vol. 22, 1986, pp. 697–722.
E. Hinton and H. C. Huang, “A family of quadrilateral Mindlin plate elements with substitute shear strain fields,” Comp. Struct., Vol. 23, 1986, pp. 409–431.
V.Hoppe, “Errors in the finite element solutions introduced by mapping in isoparametric elements,” Proc. Fourth World Congress and Exhibition on Finite Element Methods, Interlaken, September 1984, Robinson and Associates, Wimborne, Dorset, England, 1984.
V. Hoppe, “Faith and fact in finite elements,” Finite Element News, Vol. 2, 1985, pp. 12–15.
J. Donea and L. G. Lamain, “A modified representation of transverse shear in C° quadrilateral plate elements,” Comp. Meths. App. Mech. Engrg., Vol. 63, 1987, pp. 183–207.
G. Prathap, “An additional stiffening parameter measure of error of the second kind in the finite element method,” Int. J. Namer. Meths. Engrg., Vol. 21, 1985, pp. 1001–1012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prathap, G. (1993). Non-linear mapping and covariant strain approaches. In: The Finite Element Method in Structural Mechanics. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3319-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3319-9_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4326-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3319-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive