Abstract
Restoring lakes from a degraded state is a costly and risky enterprise. It is costly partly because ‘rewinding’ the cycles of degradation involves great scientific uncertainties. Therefore, the only way forward is by careful, expensive monitoring, and much adaptation of treatment as the evidence unfolds. This process requires much patience and political commitment. Therefore, the economic challenge is to find a relationship between the ecological exploration of restoration techniques and the economic justification of the outcome. Unfortunately, the basis of that justification is an economy that creates environmental degradation. So there is a cruel circularity in the economic appraisal: the process of benefit calculation is predicted on an economy that is, at present, non sustainable. This suggests that there should be another approach to economic valuation, based more on participatory processes of involving interests with a stake in the outcome and in the gains and losses that will inevitably be incurred in reaching the outcome of lake restoration. In that process, ecological science plays a vital role of explaining possible future pathways for restoration, and the dilemma of uncertainty is handled by creating various scenarios rather than models. The real challenge, therefore, is to devise a fair and full process of bargaining over lake futures, within which both ecology and economics play important, but subsidiary roles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bateman, I., 1995. Environmental and economic appraisal. In T. O’Riordan (ed.), Environmental Science for Environmental Management. Longman, Harlow: 45–65.
Clark, J. & J. Burgess, 1996. Asking questions about answering questions: a case study of public understanding of a contingent valuation survey. In P. Lowe (ed.), Environmental Valuation and Public Policy. CAB International, Wallingford.
Desvousges, W. H., V. K. Smith & A. Fisher, 1987. Option price estimates for water quality improvement: a contingent valuation study of the Mongolia River. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14: 248–267.
Georgiou, S., I. H. Langford, J. J. Bateman & R. K. Turner, 1998. Determinants of individual willingness to pay for perceived reductions in environnmental health risks: a case study of bathing water quality. Environment and Planning A 30: 577–594.
Madgwick, J., 1999. Strategies for conservation management of lakes. Hydrobiologia 395/396 ( Dev. Hydrobiol. 136 ): 309–323.
Mitchell, R. C. & R. T. Carson, 1985. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington DC.
Norton, B. C., 1994. Economists preferences and preferences of economists. Environmental Values 3: 311–332.
Phillips, G., A. Bramwell, J. Pitt, J. Stansfield & M. Perrow, 1999. Practical application of 25 years’ research into the management of shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia 395/396 ( Dev. Hydrobiol. 136 ): 61–76.
Rodgers, M., 1998. Applying the Precautionary Principle to River Management: Unpublished PhD Thesis, Charles Stuart University, Australia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
O’Riordan, T. (1999). Economic challenges for lake management. In: Harper, D.M., Brierley, B., Ferguson, A.J.D., Phillips, G. (eds) The Ecological Bases for Lake and Reservoir Management. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 136. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3282-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3282-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5251-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3282-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive