Summary
First introduced in the 10th century, Diophantus’ Arithmetica contributed much to the development of mathematics in the Middle Ages. Most notably it permitted the extension of classical Diophantine analysis, which existed already among the Arabic algebraists, independently of the Arabic translation of Diophantus.
Less well-known but more original, is the contribution of the Arithmetica to the development of new research on modern Diophantine analysis, as that term was understood by Bachet de Méziriac and Fermat. The examination of two unpublished documents in this article demonstrates this fact more clearly than before. The author shows that this research, inspired by a reading of Diophantus, was the work of mathematicians who deliberately placed themselves outside the algebraic tradition and chose an intentionally different style from that of the Arithmetica.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
According to ancient bibliographers, in particular al-Nadim, we know that al-Antaki (d. 376 H, i.e. 987) was a mathematician whose works deal mainly with arithmetic and number theory. Al-Nadim attributed a commentary on Nicomachus of Gerasa’s Introductio Arithmetica to him and a commentary on Euclid’s Elements. If only for his dates the importance of al-Antaki’s works for the history of numbers is understable. But his works remain undiscovered. We were fortunate enough to come across a later work that reproduces long passages from his commentary on the Elements. An analysis of the quoted fragments that are the only available texts of this author, show that it was an important work, comparable to works by al-Nayrizi or his successor Ibn al-Haytham. In a later paper we shall re-examine these passages including the entire manuscript from which they are extracted (MS 992). For the present let us note that al-Antaki’s interest in the study of prime numbers. He solved the following problem: to find two prime numbers a and b such that On the calculation of amicable numbers, if the author who consulted his text is to be believed, al-Antaki only gives the couple 220, 284; which indicates that, just like Thâbit ibn Qurra, he was much more interested in theoretical research than in calculating new couples. Apart from the passages by al-Antaki, the same manuscript contains fragments by al-Nayrizi, al-Dimashgi, Ibn al-Haytham and also Ibn Had’s book, Al-Istikmal. Lastly, it gives us the calculation of the couple of amicable numbers 17296, 18416, named after Fermat which we found earlier in four different texts; which is proof that this couple was part of common knowledge of Arabic mathematicans from the late thirteenth century.
Ibn al-Haytham, Sharh Musadarat Uglidis, Istanbul, MS Feyzullah 1359, f. 223’.
Ibn al-Haytham, Kitâb fi hall shukúk kitab Ugltdis fi al-Usúl, Istanbul, University Library, MS 800, ff. 140’ — 142’.
Ibid., f. 142’.
The translation of the Arabic text is based on all the available manuscripts and is published in Rashed (1991b).
in the Heiberg edition.
in the Heiberg edition.
This history is related in Rashed (1991h). Just note here that the paragraph marked by asterisks, should be inserted several lines before, i.e. before the sentence starting with “it follows that…”. This point corresponds, moreover, to a break in the text.
Ibn Fallús, Kitdb Icdad al-Israr IT Asrär ‘al-A:dad, MS Dar al-Kutub, 23317/B, ff. 62’ — 72’; cf. f. 62
Ibid., f. 70
Ibn al-Malik al-Dimashgi, Al-Is`af al-Atamm bi-Hisàb al-Qalam, Cairo, Riyadiyyat, MS Dar al-Kutub, 182, f. 279.
Ibn Fallüs, op. cit., f. 65
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rashed, R. (1994). Number Theory and Combinatorial Analysis. In: The Development of Arabic Mathematics: Between Arithmetic and Algebra. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 156. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3274-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3274-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4338-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3274-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive