Abstract
Thanks to the pioneer essays of Aron Gurwitsch and Alfred Schutz, to the later books of Johannes Linschoten, Bruce Wilshire, and John Wild, and to other articles, recently listed and analyzed most helpfully by James M. Edie,2 the parallels between James’s and Husserl’s original insights no longer have to be pointed out. Moreover, James’s place in Husserl’s field of consciousness, his admiration for and his debt to James, as attested most movingly in his private diary for September 25, 1906, have been sufficiently recorded.3 Thus it has been all the more a matter of regret, if not embarrassment, to phenomenologists, beginning with Husserl himself, that James did not reciprocate these sentiments. Instead, the general belief is that James had a low opinion of Husserl’s work. The main evidence is, as Edie puts it in his article (p. 488), that “it was James himself who advised a great eastern publishing house in America against publishing a translation of the Logische Untersuchungen.”
From Life-World and Consciousness. Essays for Aron Gurwitsch, edited by Lester E. Embree, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1972, pp. 407–22.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
“William James and Phenomenology,” Review of Metaphysics, XXIII (1970), 481–527, esp. 484, n. 8.
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, XVI (1956), 294–95; reprinted in 7’he Phenomenological Movement (The Hague, 1960), p. 114.
For similar expressions see the Freiburg diary of W. R. Boyce Gibson (published in the Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, II [1971], 68) under the date July 14, 1928: “Pitkin translated the Prolegomena of the Logische Untersuchungen,but the publisher before agreeing finally consulted William James, and William James warned him off.” See also Dorion Cairns’s records of “Conversations with Husserl and Fink” under the date February 13, 1931: “The prospective publisher of the Logische Untersuchungen was advised by William James not to publish. Husserl thinks that James saw only the Prolegomena, and that its Antipsychologismus was very unsympathetic to James.” There is also evidence that Husserl was so impressed by Pitkin’s interest that, as Dr. Schuhmann of the Husserl Archives in Louvain informs me, he drafted and presumably sent a letter to his publisher, Max Niemeyer Verlag, during the Easter vacation of 1905, i.e., even before Pitkin had left Berlin to visit him on the way to Italy. This draft, contained in MS A VI II/15b, tells Niemeyer of Pitkin’s request and adds: “I am very pleased about this, since thus far the English periodicals have reacted so little.”
The Phenomenological Movement, pp. 1 11 ff.
Chapter 5, “What Next?,” p. 319; quoted with the permission of Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Karl Schuhmann identified one draft of Husserl’s lost letters to Pitkin of February 12, 1905, in MS F I 9 (see Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 3 (1972), p. 65).
These dates are taken from Gay Wilson Allen, William James (New York, 1967), pp. 443 ff.
The letters of William James, ed. Henry James (Boston, 1920), pp. 225–27.
Atti del V Congresso Internazionale de Psichologia (Rome, 1905).
lbid., p. 57.
Ibid., p. 155.
The Phenomenological Movement, pp. 740 f.
“Husserl’s and Peirce’s Phenomenologies: Coincidence or Interaction?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, XVII (1956), 164–85; esp. 183.
“From the Early Days of the Logische Untersuchungen,” Edmund Husserl 1859–1959 (The Hague, 1959), pp. 1–11.
lbid, p. 5.
The Thought and Character of William James (Boston, 1935), II, 690 f.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1981 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spiegelberg, H. (1981). What William James Knew about Edmund Husserl: On the Credibility of Pitkin’s Testimony. In: The Context of the Phenomenological Movement. Phaenomenologica, vol 80. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3270-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3270-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8262-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3270-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive