Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 208))

  • 218 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to reconstruct the concept of natural necessity upon which the empirical causal (Humean) type of scientific law rests. In my opinion, this effort will enable one to grasp the ontological dimension of the epistemological concept: “empirical causal (Humean) type of scientific law.” The “empirical causal type of scientific law” was exemplified in the previous chapter by the following two propositions: Whenever the temperature of a gas increases while its pressure remains constant, its volume increases; and Whenever a wire loop is moved across a magnetic field, then current flows in it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Explicitly it became the subject matter of a special investigation for first time, to best of my knowledge, in U. Will’s (1984) paper.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ianalyze neither Popper’s article (1967) nor his 1968 addendum to Chapter X*, where he gives up the attempt to provide a definition of natural necessity. I also do not analyze Suchting’s response to them in (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Introduced by J. S. Mill in (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A strict conceptual differentiation of these two types of conditions will be given in Part H, subchapter 4.1, in connection with the reconstruction of the theoretical causal law.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hanzel, I. (1999). Popper’s Moa. In: The Concept of Scientific Law in the Philosophy of Science and Epistemology. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 208. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3265-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3265-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5275-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3265-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics